Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluating Three Models of Intimate Relationships

  • Published:
Contemporary Family Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate three models of intimate relationships: attachment, elementary pragmatic, and selfhood. These models were evaluated with three instruments respectively constructed to evaluate the validity of each model. One convenience group of functioning individuals and three experimental groups of inpatients and outpatients were administered the three instruments. All three instruments showed relatively high internal consistency and discriminated among the four groups. Significant correlations were found among the measure of attachment with measures of the pragmatic elementary and selfhood models. These correlations indicate that all three instruments were measuring similar aspects of intimate relationships. Clinical and preventive implications and applications of these models are briefly discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Bartholomew, K. (1990). Avoidance of intimacy: An attachment prospective. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7 147-178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1995). Stili di attaccamento tra giovani adulti: Analisi di un modello a quattro categorie. In L. Carli (Ed.), Attaccamento e relazione di coppia (pp. 229-273). Milano: Cortina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batholomew, K., & Perlman, D. (Eds.). (1994). Attachment processes in adulthood. London, UK: Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassidy, J., & Shaver, P. R, (1999). Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, C. L. H. (1996). Adolescent-parent attachments and family problem solving. Family Process, 35, 57-82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Constantine, L. L. (1993). The structure of family paradigms: An analytical model of family variation. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 19, 39-70.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Giacomo, P. (1993). Finite systems and infinite interactions: The logic of human interaction and its application to psychotherapy. Norfork, CT: Bramble Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Giacomo, P., & De Nigris, S. (in press). A computer program to improve cognitive functioning in relationships. In L. L'Abate (Ed.), Distance writing and computer-assisted interventions. Stamford, CT: Ablex Corporation.

  • De Giacomo, P., L'Abate, L., & De Giacomo, A. (1997). Integrating models of human interaction: Three models, one reality? Italian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, 7, 18-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Giacomo, P., Pierri, G., Lefons, E., & Mich, L. (1990). A technique to simulate human interactions: Relational styles leading to a schizophrenic communication pattern and back to normal. Acta Psyciatrica Scandinavica, 82, 413-419.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Giacomo, P., Pierri, G., Santoni Rugiu, A., Buonsante, M., Vadruccio, F., & Zavoianni, L. (1997). Schizophrenia: A study comparing a family therapy group following a paradoxical model plus psychodrugs and a group treated by the conventional clinical approach. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 95 183-188.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feeney, J., & Noller, P. (1996). Adult attachment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, L., & Ransom, D. C. (1995). An empirically derived typology of families: Relationships with adult health. Family Process, 34, 161-182.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Foa, U. G., Converse, J. Jr., Tornblom, K. J., & Foa, E. B. (Eds.). (1993). Resource exchange theory: Explorations and applications. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinde, R. A. (1997). Relationships: A dialectical perspective. East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtzman, W. H., Thorpe, H. S., Swartz, J. D., & Herron, E. W, (1961). Inkblot perception and personality. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiesler, D. J. (Ed.). (1996). Contemporary interpersonal theory research: Personality, psychopathology, and psychotherapy. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • L'Abate, L. (1994a). A theory of personality development. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • L'Abate, L. (1994b). Book review. De Giacomo's finite systems and infinite interactions. American Journal of Family Therapy, 21, 89-94.

    Google Scholar 

  • L'Abate, L. (1997). The self in the family: A classification of personality, criminality, and psychopathology. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • L'Abate, L. (1998). Discovery of the family: From the inside to the outside. American Journal of Family Therapy, 26, 265-280.

    Google Scholar 

  • L'Abate, L. (1999). Taking the bull by the horns: Beyond talk in psychological interventions. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 7, 206-220.

    Google Scholar 

  • L'Abate, L. (paper submitted for publication). Being together: Holding without demands.

  • Lindaver, P. (1998). Le persone in relazione: Tre modelli teorici a confronto. Famiglia, Interdisciplinarita' Ricerca, 3, 101-114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefons, E., Pazienza, M. T., Silvestri, A., Tangorra, F., Corfiati, L., De Giacomo, P., & Pierri, G. (1979). Possibilita' di riconoscimento di stati depressivi secondo il test SISCI-I. Psychiatrica Messanensia, 1, 25-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loevinger, J. (1957). Objective tests as instruments of psychological theory. Psychological Reports, 3, 635-694.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCubbin, H. L., Thompson, A. I., Pirner, P. A., & McCubbin, M. A. (1988). Family types and strengths: A life cycle and ecological perspective. Edina, MN: Burgess International Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. H. (1993). Circumplex modelof marital and family systems. In F. Walsh (Ed.), Normal family processes (pp. 104-137). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, O. G., & Ferreira, C. P. (1985). Applicazioni del modello di De Giacomo e Silvestri in psicologia. In C. Cipolli & A. Silvetri (Eds.), Communicazione e sistemi (pp. 166-168). Milano, Italy: Franco Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plutchik, R., & Conte, H. R. (Eds.).(1997). Circumplex models of personality and emotions. Washington, D. C.: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, D. (1981). The family's construction of reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvo, R. (in press). The adult attachment questionnaire: A construction and a contribution towards its statistical validity. Testing, Psicometrica, Metodologia

  • Salvo, R., Cusinato, M., & Rossetti, N. (1996). Attaccamento e relazione di coppia. Famiglia, Interdisciplinarieta', Ricerca, 1, 5-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvo, R., & Minervini, P. (undated). A model of attachment in adult relationship and a model of self-importance: A theoretical and methodological comparison (unpublished manuscript). Dipartimento di Psicologia Generale, University of Padova, Italy.

  • Sanford, K. (1997). Two dimensions of adult attachment: Further validation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14, 133-143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwebel, A. I. (1993). Family defense mechanisms: The concept and its utility to family scientists, practitioners, and educators. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 1, 31-41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, J. A., & Rholes, W. S. (Eds.). (1998). Attachment theory and close relationships. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

L'Abate, L., De Giacomo, P., McCarty, F. et al. Evaluating Three Models of Intimate Relationships. Contemporary Family Therapy 22, 103–122 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007726717603

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007726717603

Navigation