Skip to main content
Log in

Land Prices and Land Assembly in the CBD

  • Published:
The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is substantial empirical evidence of price concavity in the parcel-size dimension across land-use types and across urban regions. This article examines the degree to which concavity varies between the Central Business District (CBD) and the rest of the urban area. The article provides strong empirical support that the degree of concavity within the CBD is lower than in the rest of the county. Although concavity may be the dominant pricing relationship throughout most urban areas, there is some evidence of the presence of a convex price structure within the urban center.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brownstone, D., and A. DeVany. (1991).“Zoning, Returns to Scale, and the Value of Undeveloped Land” Review of Economics and Statistics 63, 699–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwell, P. F., and H. J. Munneke. (1997).“The Structure of Urban Land Prices” Journal of Urban Economics 41 (May), 321–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwell, P. F., and T. Scheu. (1994).“A History of Site Valuation Rules” Journal of Real Estate Research 9, 353–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwell, P. F., and C. F. Sirmans. (1993).“A Comment on Zoning, Returns to Scale, and the Value of Undeveloped Land” Review of Economics and Statistics 4, 783–786.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L. F. (1982).“Some Approaches to the Correction of Selectivity Bias” Review of Economic Studies 49, 355–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L. F. (1983).“Notes and Comments Generalized Econometric Models with Selectivity” Econometrica 51, 507–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G. S. (1983). Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, J. F. (1981).“Spatial Patterns of Business Land Values in Chicago” Urban Geography 3, 201–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillen, D. P. (1990).“Consistent Estimation of the Urban Land Value Function” Journal of Urban Economics 27, 285–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillen, D. P., and J. F. McDonald. (1991).“Urban Land Value Functions with Endogenous Zoning” Journal of Urban Economics 29, 14–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munch, P. (1976).“An Economic Analysis of Eminent Domain” Journal of Political Economy 84, 473–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peiser, R. B. (1987).“The Determinants of Nonresidential Urban Land Values” Journal of Urban Economics 22, 340–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirmans, C. F., and P. F. Colwell. (1978).“Area, Time, Centrality and the Value of Urban Land” Land Economics 54, 514–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirmans, C. F., and P. F. Colwell. (1980).“Nonlinear Urban Land Prices” Urban Geography 1, 141–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornes, P., and D. P. McMillen. (1998).“Land Value and Parcel Size: A Semiparametric Analysis” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 17, 233–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trost, R. P., and L. F. Lee. (1984).“Technical Training and Earnings: A Polychotomous Choice Model with Selectivity” Review of Economics and Statistics 66, 151–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, N. E. (1988).“The Market Effects of Zoning Undeveloped Land: Does Zoning Follow the Market?'' Journal of Urban Economics 23, 307–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeates, M. H. (1965).“Some Factors Affecting the Spatial Distribution of Chicago Land Values 1910–1960” Economic Geography 41, 57–70.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Colwell, P.F., Munneke, H.J. Land Prices and Land Assembly in the CBD. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 18, 163–180 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007714624700

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007714624700

Navigation