Skip to main content
Log in

The Structure of Production in the Norwegian Fish-Processing Industry: An Empirical Multi-Output Cost Analysis Using a Hybrid Translog Functional Form

  • Published:
Journal of Productivity Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An empirical analysis of production structure in the Norwegian fish-processing industry is undertaken, based on data for the period 1985–90. This industry processes raw materials into fresh, frozen, salted and dried fish products. Two technologies coexist in the industry. Producer behaviour is represented by a multi-output variable, or restricted cost function for each technology. The hybrid translog functional form is adopted for estimation, as this form can be evaluated even if some of the output values are zero. Results from the empirical analysis provide important information for the restructuring currently taking place in the industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, D. R., and J. G. Thursby. (1986). “Confidence Intervals for Elasticity Estimators in Translog Models.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 2, 647–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barten, E. R. (1969). “Maximum Likelihood Estimation of a Complete System of Demand Equations.” European Economic Review 1, 7–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendiksen, B. I., and B. Dreyer. (1990). Driftsundersøkelser i fiskeindustrien. Fiskeriforskning, Tromsø (in Norwegian).

  • Bendiksen, B. I., and B. Dreyer. (1991). Driftsundersøkelser i fiskeindustrien. Fiskeriforskning, Tromsø (in Norwegian).

  • Binswanger, H. P. (1974). “A Cost Function Approach to the Measurement of Elasticities of Factor Demand and Elasticities of Substitution.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 56, 377–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackorby, C., and R. R. Russell. (1989). “Will the Real Elasticity of Substitution Please Stand up? (A Comparison of the Allen/Uzawa and Morishima Elasticities).” The American Economic Review 79, 882–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breusch, T. S., and A. R. Pagan. (1979). “ASimple Test for Heteroscedasticity and Random CoefficientVariation.” Econometrica 47, 1287–1294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves, D. W, L. R. Christensen, and M. Tretheway. (1980). “Flexible Cost Functions for Multiproduct Firms.” Review of Economics and Statistics 62, 477–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves, D. W., L. R. Christensen, and J. A. Swanson. (1981). “Productivity Growth, Scale Economies, and Capacity Utilization in U.S. Railroads, 1955–74.” American Economic Review 71, 994–1002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denny, M., and C. Pinto. (1978). “An Aggregate Model with Multi-Product Technologies.” In M. Fuss, and D. McFadden, (eds.), Production Economics: A Dual Approach to Theory and Applications. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 219–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson, D. (1986). “Econometric Methods for Modelling Producer Behaviour.” In Z. Griliches, and M. D. Intriligator, (eds.), Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. 3, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1841–1915.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M. (1986). “Banking Technology and the Existence of a Consistent Output Aggregate.” Journal of Monetary Economics 18, 181–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kmenta, J. (1986). Elements of Econometrics. Macmillan Publishing Company.

  • Nelson, R. (1985). “Returns to Scale from Variable and Total Cost Functions, Evidence from the Electric Power Industry.” Economic Letters 18, 271–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otha, M. (1974). “A Note on the Duality Between Production and Cost Functions: Rates of Return to Scale and Rates of Technical Progress.” Economic Studies Quarterly 25, 63–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pindyck, R. S. (1979). The Structure of World Energy Demand. MIT-Press.

  • Röller, L. H. (1990). “Proper Quadratic Cost Functions with an Application to the Bell System.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 72, 202–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vassdal, T. (1988). Måling av produktivitet. En sammenligning av ulike metoder, med spesiell vekt på Data Envelopment Analysis. University of Tromsø, (in Norwegian).

  • Zellner, A. (1962). “An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and Test for Aggregation Bias.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 57, 348–368.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Toft, A., Bjørndal, T. The Structure of Production in the Norwegian Fish-Processing Industry: An Empirical Multi-Output Cost Analysis Using a Hybrid Translog Functional Form. Journal of Productivity Analysis 8, 247–267 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007703620674

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007703620674

Navigation