Abstract
An empirical analysis of production structure in the Norwegian fish-processing industry is undertaken, based on data for the period 1985–90. This industry processes raw materials into fresh, frozen, salted and dried fish products. Two technologies coexist in the industry. Producer behaviour is represented by a multi-output variable, or restricted cost function for each technology. The hybrid translog functional form is adopted for estimation, as this form can be evaluated even if some of the output values are zero. Results from the empirical analysis provide important information for the restructuring currently taking place in the industry.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, D. R., and J. G. Thursby. (1986). “Confidence Intervals for Elasticity Estimators in Translog Models.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 2, 647–656.
Barten, E. R. (1969). “Maximum Likelihood Estimation of a Complete System of Demand Equations.” European Economic Review 1, 7–73.
Bendiksen, B. I., and B. Dreyer. (1990). Driftsundersøkelser i fiskeindustrien. Fiskeriforskning, Tromsø (in Norwegian).
Bendiksen, B. I., and B. Dreyer. (1991). Driftsundersøkelser i fiskeindustrien. Fiskeriforskning, Tromsø (in Norwegian).
Binswanger, H. P. (1974). “A Cost Function Approach to the Measurement of Elasticities of Factor Demand and Elasticities of Substitution.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 56, 377–386.
Blackorby, C., and R. R. Russell. (1989). “Will the Real Elasticity of Substitution Please Stand up? (A Comparison of the Allen/Uzawa and Morishima Elasticities).” The American Economic Review 79, 882–88.
Breusch, T. S., and A. R. Pagan. (1979). “ASimple Test for Heteroscedasticity and Random CoefficientVariation.” Econometrica 47, 1287–1294.
Caves, D. W, L. R. Christensen, and M. Tretheway. (1980). “Flexible Cost Functions for Multiproduct Firms.” Review of Economics and Statistics 62, 477–481.
Caves, D. W., L. R. Christensen, and J. A. Swanson. (1981). “Productivity Growth, Scale Economies, and Capacity Utilization in U.S. Railroads, 1955–74.” American Economic Review 71, 994–1002.
Denny, M., and C. Pinto. (1978). “An Aggregate Model with Multi-Product Technologies.” In M. Fuss, and D. McFadden, (eds.), Production Economics: A Dual Approach to Theory and Applications. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 219–268.
Jorgenson, D. (1986). “Econometric Methods for Modelling Producer Behaviour.” In Z. Griliches, and M. D. Intriligator, (eds.), Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. 3, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1841–1915.
Kim, M. (1986). “Banking Technology and the Existence of a Consistent Output Aggregate.” Journal of Monetary Economics 18, 181–195.
Kmenta, J. (1986). Elements of Econometrics. Macmillan Publishing Company.
Nelson, R. (1985). “Returns to Scale from Variable and Total Cost Functions, Evidence from the Electric Power Industry.” Economic Letters 18, 271–276.
Otha, M. (1974). “A Note on the Duality Between Production and Cost Functions: Rates of Return to Scale and Rates of Technical Progress.” Economic Studies Quarterly 25, 63–65.
Pindyck, R. S. (1979). The Structure of World Energy Demand. MIT-Press.
Röller, L. H. (1990). “Proper Quadratic Cost Functions with an Application to the Bell System.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 72, 202–210.
Vassdal, T. (1988). Måling av produktivitet. En sammenligning av ulike metoder, med spesiell vekt på Data Envelopment Analysis. University of Tromsø, (in Norwegian).
Zellner, A. (1962). “An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and Test for Aggregation Bias.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 57, 348–368.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Toft, A., Bjørndal, T. The Structure of Production in the Norwegian Fish-Processing Industry: An Empirical Multi-Output Cost Analysis Using a Hybrid Translog Functional Form. Journal of Productivity Analysis 8, 247–267 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007703620674
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007703620674