Advertisement

Agriculture and Human Values

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 365–379 | Cite as

Agriculture and biodiversity: Finding our place in this world

  • Jeffrey A. Lockwood
Article

Abstract

Agriculture has been recently viewed as the primary destructive force of biodiversity, but the places that produce our food and fiber may also hold the key to saving the richness of life on earth. This argument is based on three fundamental positions. First, it is argued that to value and thereby preserve and restore biodiversity we must begin by employing anthropocentric ethics. While changing our understanding of intrinsic values (i.e., the unconditional values of biodiversity as a state and process in-and-of-itself, without reference to human interests) is often advocated as the means by which our behavior will reflect the importance of biodiversity, a change in how we perceive and conditionally value biodiversity is proposed as a more effective and compelling approach. Second, I suggest that anthropocentric values can be linked to a sense of “Place,” with agriculture playing a vital role in this context. Agriculture forms a powerful basis for personal, experiential development of a profound meaning and connection to a setting or landscape. The agricultural setting has tremendous potential for arational (emotional, aesthetic, and spiritual) values that ultimately compel our actions. The constancy of relationship and mutuality of dependency between humans and agricultural lands, particularly extensive agroecosystems, fosters an intensity of association that transcends our recent affinity to wildlands. Third, a mature understanding of places and their biodiversity must include those organisms that account for many of the ecological processes and the majority of the species richness -- the insects. The importance of these insects in structuring the landscape and the effects of habitat destruction on these organisms both suggest a vital, intimate, and reciprocal link between insects and Places. Finally, it is argued that the most important avenue for future efforts to protect and restore biodiversity on the part of agricultural and other scientists is educational -- the presentation of our research to the public in terms that provoke emotional, aesthetic, and spiritual meaning which lies at the core of human values and actions.

Biodiversity Human ecology Anthropocentrism Native Biophilia Arational values Place 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anonymous (1996). “Respond to the 1996 strategic plan for ESA,” Entomological Society of America Newsletter 19: 1–15.Google Scholar
  2. Baskin, Y. (1997). The Work of Nature. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  3. Baxter, G. T. and M. D. Stone (1985). Amphibians and reptiles of Wyoming. Cheyenne, WY: Wyoming Game and Fish Department.Google Scholar
  4. Beattie, M. (1995). “The endangered species act: Myths and realities,” Paper presented at the Society of Environmental Journalists Meeting, 20 May, Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
  5. Belovsky, G. E. (1990). “Grasshopper competition and predation: Biological control options,” in Cooperative Grasshopper Pest Management Project Annual Report (pp. 37–44). Boise: USDA-APHIS-PPQ.Google Scholar
  6. Belovsky G. E. and J. Slade (1990). “New Montana decticid, a glacial relict,” Metaleptea 12: 3.Google Scholar
  7. Bethell, T. (1995). “Species logic,” American Spectator (Aug.): 20–22.Google Scholar
  8. Brusven, M. A. (1972). “Differentiation and ecology of common Catantopinae and Cyrtacanthacridinae nymphs (Orthoptera: Acrididae) of Idaho and adjacent areas,” Melanderia 9: 1–31.Google Scholar
  9. Busby, F. E. (1994). Rangeland Health: New Methods to Classify, Inventory, and Monitor Rangelands. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  10. Capinera, J. L. and T. S. Sechrist (1982). “Grasshoppers (Acrididae) of Colorado: Identification, biology, and management,” Colorado State University Experiment Station Bulletin 584S.Google Scholar
  11. Chadwick, D. H. (1993). “The American prairie: Roots of the sky,” National Geographic Magazine 184: 90–119.Google Scholar
  12. Chapman, R. F. and A. Joern (eds.) (1990). Biology of Grasshoppers. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. Clark, T. W. and M. R. Stromberg (1987). Mammals in Wyoming. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
  14. Crum, R. B. (1931). Scientific Thought in Poetry. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Daily, G. C. (1997). Nature's Services. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  16. Devall, B. and G. Sessions (1985). Deep Ecology. Layton, UT: Gibbs Smith.Google Scholar
  17. Duncan, P. D. (1978). Tallgrass Prairie: The Inland Sea. Kansas City, MO: Lowell.Google Scholar
  18. Ehrenfeld D. (1988). “What put a value on biodiversity?” in E. O. Wilson (ed.), Biodiversity (pp. 212–216). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  19. Ehrlich, P. and A. Ehrlich (1981). Extinction: The Causes and Consequences of the Disappearance of Species. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar
  20. Eiseley, L. (1972). Notes of an Alchemist. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.Google Scholar
  21. Eiseley, L. (1973). The Innocent Assassins. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.Google Scholar
  22. Eisner, T. and E. O. Wilson (1977). The Insects. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  23. Finch, R. and J. Elder (eds.) (1990). The Norton Book of Nature Writing. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  24. Gordon, R. E. (1994). “Saving endangered species: What's really happening?” AMC Journal (June): 6–8.Google Scholar
  25. Gould, S. J. (1980). The Panda's Thumb. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  26. Groombridge, B. (ed.) (1992). Global Biodiversity: Status of the Earth's Living Resources. Report compiled by the World Conservation Monitoring Center. New York: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  27. Gussow, A. (1983). “A sense of place,” in S. Van Marte and B. Weiler (eds.), The Earth Speaks (p. 45). Warrenville, IL: The Institute for Earth Education.Google Scholar
  28. Hewitt, G. B. and J. A. Onsager (1983). “Control of grasshoppers on rangeland in the United States — a perspective,” Journal of Range Management 36: 202–207.Google Scholar
  29. Hiss, T. (1990). The Experience of Place. New York: Alfred A Knopf.Google Scholar
  30. Holahan, C. J. (1982). Environmental Psychology. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  31. Houck, O. A. (1995). “Reflections on the endangered species act,” Environmental Law 25: 689–702.Google Scholar
  32. Howarth, F. G. (1983). “Biological control: Panacea or Pandora's box?” Proceedings of the Hawaii Entomological Society 24: 239–244.Google Scholar
  33. Howarth, F. G. (1991). “Environmental impacts of classical biological control,” Annual Review of Entomology 36: 485–509.Google Scholar
  34. Iltis, H. H. (1988). “Serendipity in the exploration of biodiversity: what good are weedy tomatoes,” in E. O. Wilson (ed.), Biodiversity (pp. 98–105). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  35. Jackson, W. (1980). New Roots for Agriculture. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  36. Johns, E. (1991). “Settlement and Development,” in W. H. Treuttner (ed.), The West as America: Reinterpreting Images of the Frontier, 1820–1920 (pp. 191–235). Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
  37. Johnson, L. E. (1991). A Morally Deep World: An Essay on Moral Significance and Environmental ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Kalish, R. A. and K. W. Collier (1981). Exploring Human Values: Psychological and Philosophical Considerations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  39. Kemp, W. P. (1992a). “Temporal variation in rangeland grasshopper (Orthoptera: Acrididae) communities in the steppe region of Montana, USA,” Canadian Entomology 124: 437–450.Google Scholar
  40. Kemp, W. P. (1992b). “Rangeland grasshopper (Orthoptera: Acrididae) community structure: A working hypothesis,” Environmental Entomology 21: 461–470.Google Scholar
  41. Kemp, W. P, S. J. Harvey, and K. M. O'Neill (1990a). “Patterns of vegetation and grasshopper community composition,” Oecologia 83: 299–308.Google Scholar
  42. Kemp, W. P, S. J. Harvey, and K. M. O'Neill (1990b). “Habitat and insect biology revisited,” American Entomologist 36: 44–49.Google Scholar
  43. Lavigne, R. J and R. E. Pfadt (1966). Parasites and Predators of Wyoming Rangeland Grasshoppers. Wyoming Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin Science Monograph 3, 31 pp.Google Scholar
  44. Leopold, A. (1949). A Sand County Almanac. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Lockwood, J. A. (1993a). “Environmental issues involved in the biological control of rangeland grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae) with exotic agents,” Environmental Entomology 22: 503–518.Google Scholar
  46. Lockwood, J. A. (1993b). “The benefits and costs of controlling rangeland grasshoppers with exotic organisms: the search for a null hypothesis and regulatory compromise,” Environmental Entomology 22: 904–914.Google Scholar
  47. Lockwood, J. A. (1996). “The ethics of biological control: Understanding the moral implications of our most powerful ecological technology,” Agriculture and Human Values 13: 2–19.Google Scholar
  48. Lockwood, J. A. (1998). “The intent and implementation of the ESA: a matter of scale,” in J. Shogren (ed.), Endangered Species and Private Property (pp. 70–91). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  49. Lockwood, J. A. and L. D. DeBrey (1990). “A solution for the sudden and unexplained extinction of the Rocky Mountain Locust, Melanoplus spretus (Walsh),” Environmental Entomology 19: 1194–1205.Google Scholar
  50. Lockwood, J. A., T. McNary, J. C. Larsen, and J. Cole (1993). “Distribution atlas for grasshoppers and the Mormon cricket in Wyoming 1988–1992,” Wyoming Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin: B-976.Google Scholar
  51. Lockwood, J. A. and S. P. Schell (1995). “Rangeland grasshopper outbreak dynamics: Gradient, eruptive, both, or neither?” Journal of Orthopthera Research 4: 35–48.Google Scholar
  52. Louda S. M., D. Kendall, J. Conner, and D. Simberloff (1997). “Ecological effects of an insect introduced for the biological control of weeds,” Science 277: 1088–1090.Google Scholar
  53. Lutwack, L. (1984). The Role of Place in Literature. New York: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Lym, R. G. (1991). “Economic impact, classification, distribution, and ecology of leafy spurge,” in L. F James, J. O. Evans, M. H. Ralphs, and R. D. Child (eds.), Noxious Range Weeds (pp. 169–181). Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
  55. McEwen, L. C, B. E. Peterson, D. W. Beyers, F. P. Howe, J. S. Adams, C. K. Miller, and J. M. Fair (1991). “Environmental monitoring and evaluation: Grasshopper integrated pest management program,” in Cooperative Trasshopper Integrated Pest Management Project Annual Report (pp. 123–133). Boise: USDA-APHIS-PPQ.Google Scholar
  56. Mulkern, G. B. (1967). “Food selection by grasshoppers,” Annual Review of Entomology 12: 59–78.Google Scholar
  57. Myers, N. (1992). The Primary Source: Tropical Forests and Our Future. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  58. Nations, J. D. (1988). “Deep Ecology Meets the Developing World,” in E. O. Wilson (ed.), Biodiversity (pp. 79–82). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  59. Nollman, J. (1990). Spiritual Ecology. New York: Bantam.Google Scholar
  60. Norgaard, R. B. (1988). “The rise of the global exchange economy and the loss of biological diversity,” in E. O. Wilson (ed.), Biodiversity (pp. 206–211). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  61. Norton, B. (1988). “Commodity, amenity, and morality: the limits of quantification in valuing biodiversity,” in E. O. Wilson (ed.), Biodiversity (pp. 200–205). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  62. Oakleaf, B., H. Downing, B. Raynes, M. Raynes, and O. K. Scott (1982). Wyoming Avian Atlas. Cheyenne, WY: Wyoming Game and Fish Department and the Bighorn Audobon Society.Google Scholar
  63. Parker, M. A. (1984). “Local food depletion and the foraging behavior of a specialist grasshopper,” Hesperotettix viridis. Ecology 65: 824–35.Google Scholar
  64. Pfadt, R. E. (1994). “Field guide to common western grasshoppers,” 2nd edn. Wyoming Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 912.Google Scholar
  65. Plotkin, M. J. (1988). “The outlook for new agricultural and industrial products from the tropics,” in E. O. Wilson (ed.), Biodiversity (pp. 106–116). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  66. Randall, A. (1988). “What mainstream economists have to say about the value of biodiversity,” in E. O. Wilson (ed.), Biodiversity (pp. 217–223). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  67. Risser, P. G. (1988). “Diversity in and among grasslands,” in E. O. Wilson (ed.), Biodiversity (pp. 176–180). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  68. Risser, P. G, H. D. Birney, S. W. Blocker, W. J. May, W. J. Parton, and J. A. Wiens. (1981). The True Prairie Ecosystem. Stroudsburg, PA: Hutchinson Ross.Google Scholar
  69. Roche, B. F. and C. T. Roche (1991). “Identification, introduction, distribution, ecology, and economics of Centaurea species,” in L. F. James, J. O. Evans, M. H. Ralphs, and R. D. Child (eds.), Noxious Range Weeds (pp. 274–291). Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
  70. Rose, C. M. (1994). “Given-ness and gift: property and the quest for environmental ethics,” Environmental Law 24: 1–30.Google Scholar
  71. Samways, M. J. (1995). “Southern hemisphere insects: Their variety and the environmental pressures upon them,” in R. Harrington and N. E. Stork (eds.), Insects in a Changing Environment (pp. 297–320). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  72. Shogren, J. (1998). Endangered Species and Private Property. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  73. Schumacher E. F. (1973). Small is Beautiful. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  74. Sinha, A. (1995). Readings in Environmental Psychology: Landscape Perception. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  75. Soul, M. E. (1988). “Mind in the biosphere; mind of the biosphere,” in E. O. Wilson (ed.), Biodiversity (pp. 465–469). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  76. Streett, D. A. and M. R. McGuire (1990). “Pathogenic diseases of grasshoppers,” in R. F. Chapman and A. Joern (eds.), Biology of Grasshoppers (pp. 483–516). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  77. Strong, D. R. (1997). “Fear no weevil?” Science 277: 1058–1059.Google Scholar
  78. Turnbull, A. L. (1980). “Man and insects: The influence of human settlement on the insect fauna of Canada,” Canadian Entomology 112: 1177–1184.Google Scholar
  79. US Department of Agriculture (1996). “A vision for rangeland research,” Agricultural Research Service Program Aid: 1547.Google Scholar
  80. US Fish and Wildlife Service (1995). Report to Congress: Endangered and Threatened Species Recovery Program. US Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service.Google Scholar
  81. Usher, M. B. (1995). “A world of change: Land-use patterns and arthropod communities,” in R. Harrington and N. E. Stork (eds.), Insects in a Changing Environment (pp. 371–397). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  82. Watts, J. G., E. W. Huddleston, and J. C. Owens (1982). “Rangeland entomology,” Annual Review of Entomology 27: 283–311.Google Scholar
  83. Watts, J. G., G. B. Hewitt, E. W. Huddleston, H. G. Kinzer, R. J. Lavigne, and D. N. Ueckert (1988). Rangeland Entomology. Denver, CO: Society for Range Management.Google Scholar
  84. Wilson, E. O. (1988a.) Biodiversity. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  85. Wilson, E. O. (1988b). “The current state of biological diversity,” in E. O. Wilson (ed.), Biodiversity (pp. 3–18). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  86. Wilson, E. O. (1992). The Diversity of Life. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  87. World Conservation Union (1996). IUCN Red List of Threatened Animals. Cambridge, UK: IUCN Publication Services.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeffrey A. Lockwood
    • 1
  1. 1.Entomology Section, Department of Renewable ResourcesUniversity of WyomingLaramieUSA

Personalised recommendations