Skip to main content
Log in

The Neuroecology of the Elasmobranch Electrosensory World: Why Peripheral Morphology Shapes Behavior

  • Published:
Environmental Biology of Fishes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The adaptations of elasmobranch sensory systems can be studied by linking the morphological structure with the natural behavior and ecology of the organism. This paper presents the first step in a ‘neuroecological’ approach to interpret the spatial arrangement of the electrosensory ampullary organs in elasmobranch fishes. A brief review of the structure and function of the ampullae of Lorenzini is provided for interpretation of the organ system morphology in relation to the detection of dipole and uniform electric fields. The spatial projections of canals from discrete ampullary clusters were determined for the barndoor skate, Raja laevis, based upon a published figure in Raschi (1986), and measured directly from the head of the white shark, Carcharodon carcharias. The dorsoventrally flattened body of the skate restricts the projections of long canals to the horizontal plane. There is a distinct difference between dorsal and ventral projection patterns in all groups. Notable within-cluster features include a relatively long canal subgroup in the dorsal superficial ophthalmic (SOd) and dorsal hyoid (HYOd) clusters that are oriented parallel (bidirectionally) to the longitudinal axis of the body. It is postulated that this subgroup of canals may be important for detection and orientation to weak uniform fields. Ventral canal projections in the skate are primarily lateral, with the exception of the hyoid (HYOv) that also projects medially. This wide dispersion may function for the detection of prey located below the body and pectoral fins of the skate, and may also be used for orientation behavior. The mandibular canals located near the margin of the lower jaw (of both study species) are ideally positioned for use during prey manipulation or capture, and possibly for interspecific courtship or biting. The head of the white shark, which lacks the hyoid clusters, is ovoid in cross section and thus ampullary canals can project into three-dimensional space. The SOd and superficial ophthalmic ventral (SOv) clusters show strong rostral, dorsal and lateral projection components, whereas the SOv also detects rostral fields under the snout. In the sagittal plane, the SOv and SOd have robust dorsal projections as well as ventral in the SOv. Most notable are canal projections in the white shark buccal (BUC) ampullary cluster, which has a radial turnstile configuration on the ventrolateral side of the snout. The turnstile design and tilt between orthogonal planes indicates the white shark BUC may function in detection of uniform fields, including magnetically induced electric fields that may be used in orientation behaviors. These data can be used in future neuroecology behavioral performance experiments to (1) test for possible specializations of cluster groups to different natural electric stimuli, (2) the possibility of specialized canal subgroups within a cluster, and (3) test several models of navigation that argue for the use of geomagnetically induced electric cues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ainley, D.G., R.P. Henderson, H.R. Huber, R.J. Boekelheide, S.G. Allen & T.L. McElroy. 1985. Dynamics of white shark/pinniped interactions in the Gulf of Farallones. S. Calif. Acad. Sci. Mem. 9: 109–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, K.L. & C.W. Hawryshyn. 1999. Spectral sensitivity of the Hawaiian saddle wrasse, Thalassoma duperrey, and implications for visually mediated behaviour on coral reefs. Env. Biol. Fish. 56: 429–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blonder, B. I. & W. S. Alevizon. 1988. Prey discrimination and electroreception in the stingray Dasyatis Sabina. Copeia 1988: 33–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodznick, D. & A.W. Schmidt. 1984. Somatotopy within the medullary electrosensory nucleus of the skate, Raja erinacea. J. Comp. Neurol. 225: 581–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratton, B.O. & J.L. Ayers. 1987. Observations on the electric discharge of two skate species (Chondrichthyes: Rajidae) and its relationship to behavior. Env. Biol. Fish. 20: 241–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, F.G. & J. Scharrold. 1990. Movements of blue sharks (Prionace glauca) in course and depth. Mar. Biol. 106: 329–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu, Y.T. & Q.W. Wen. 1979. A study of the lateral line canals system and that of Lorenzini ampullae and tubules of elasmobranchiate fishes of China. Monograph of Fishes of China, 2, Shanghai Science Technology Press, Shanghai. 132 pp. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijkgraaf, S. & A.J. Kalmijn. 1966. Versuche zur biologischen Bedeutung der Lorenzinischen Ampullen bei den Elasmobranchiern. Z. Vergl. Physiol. 53: 187–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, J. 1963. The acid mucopolysaccharides in the glands of Lorenzini of elasmobranch fish. Biochem. J. 88: 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewart, J.C. & J.C. Mitchell. 1891. On the lateral sense organs of elasmobranchs. II. The sensory canals of the common skate (Raja batis). Trans. R. Soc. Edin. 37: 87–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez, P. & P.J. Motta. 1997. Trophic consequences of differential performance: ontogeny of oral jaw-crushing performance in the sheephead, Archosargus probatocephalus (Teleostei, Sparidae) J. Zool. Lond. 243: 737–756.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hueter, R.E. 1990. Adaptations for spatial vision in sharks. J. Exp. Zool. Suppl. 5: 130–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalmijn, A.J. 1971. The electric sense of sharks and rays. J. Exp. Biol. 55: 371–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalmijn, A.J. 1974. The detection of electric fields from inanimate and animate sources other than electric organs. pp. 147–200. In: A. Fessard (ed.) Handbook of Sensory Physiology, Vol III/3, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalmijn, A.J. 1978. Electric and magnetic sensory world of sharks, skates, and rays. pp. 507–528. In: E.S. Hodgson & R.F. Mathewson (ed.) Sensory Biology of Sharks, Skates, and Rays, Office of Naval Research, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalmijn, A.J. 1982. Electric and magnetic field detection in elasmobranch fishes. Science 218: 916–918.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalmijn, A.J. 1984. Theory of electromagnetic orientation: a further analysis. pp. 525–560. In: L. Bolis, R.D. Keynes & S.H.P. Maddrell (ed.) Comparative Physiology of Sensory Systems, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalmijn, A.J. 1987. Electric and near-field acoustic detection, a comparative study. Acta Physiol. Scand. 161,Suppl. 638: 25–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klimley, A.P. 1993. Highly directional swimming by scalloped hammerhead shark, Sphyrna lewini, and subsurface irradiance, temperature, bathymetry, and geomagnetic field. Mar. Biol. 117: 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klimley, A.P., P. Pyle & S.D. Anderson. 1996. The behavior of white sharks and their pinniped prey during predatory attacks. pp. 175–191. In: A.P. Klimley & D.G. Ainley (ed.) Great White Sharks, Academic Press, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, A. 1916. The lateral sense organs of elasmobranchs: the ampullary canals of the genus Raia. Trans. R. Soc. Edin. 51: 467–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Boeuf, B.J., M. Riedman & R.S. Keyes. 1982. White shark predation on pinnipeds in California coastal waters. U.S. Fish. Bull. 80: 891–895.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, D.J. & R.E. Jones. 1996. White shark predation and scavenging on cetaceans in the eastern north Pacific ocean. pp. 293–307. In: A.P. Klimley & D.G. Ainley (ed.) Great White Sharks, Academic Press, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzini, S. 1678, Osservazioni intorno alle Torpedini. vol 1. Firenze. 136 pp.

  • McCosker, J.E. 1985. White shark attack behavior: observations of and speculations about predator and prey strategies. S. Calif. Acad. Sci. Mem. 9: 123–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEachran, J.D. & T. Miyake. 1990. Phylogenetic interrelationships of skates: a working hypothesis (Chondrichthyes, Rajoidei). pp. 285–326. In: H.L. Pratt, S.H. Gruber & T. Taniuchi (ed.) Elasmobranchs as Living Resources: Advances in the Biology, Ecology, Systematics, and the Status of the Fisheries, U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA Technical Report NMFS 90.

  • Montgomery, J.C. 1984. Frequency response characteristics of primary and secondary neurons in the electrosensory system of the thornback ray. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 79A: 189–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, S.A. 1977. Feeding mechanisms in sharks. Amer. Zool. 17: 355–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motta, P.J., S.F. Norton & J.J. Luczkovich. 1995. Perspectives on the ecomorphology of bony fishes. Env. Biol. Fish. 44: 11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, R.W. 1960. Electrical sensitivity of the ampullae of Lorenzini. Nature 187: 957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, R.W. 1962. The response of the ampullae of Lorenzini in elasmobranchs to electrical stimulation. J. Exp. Biol. 39: 119–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, R.W. & T.W. Potts. 1961. The composition of endolymph and other body fluids in elasmobranches. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 2: 65–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, H.W. 1929. The distribution and innervation of the ampullae of Lorenzini of the dogfish, Squalus acanthias. Some comparisons with conditions in other plagiostomes and corrections of prevalent errors. J. Comp. Neurol. 47: 449–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulin, M.G. 1995. Electroreception and the compass sense of sharks. J. Theor. Biol. 174: 325–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raschi, W. 1986. A morphological analysis of the ampullae of Lorenzini in selected skates (Pisces, Rajoidei). J. Morph. 189: 225–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sciarrotta, T.C. & D.R. Nelson. 1977. Diel behavior of the blue shark, Prionace glauca, near Santa Catalina, California. U.S. Fish. Bull. 75: 519–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sisneros, J.A., T.C. Tricas & C.A. Luer. 1998. Response properties and biological function of the skate electrosensory system during ontogeny. Journal of Comparative Physiology, A 183: 87–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenonis, N. 1664. De musculis et glandulis observationum specimen cum duabus epistolis quarum una ad guil. Pisonum de anatome Rajae etc., Amstelodami.

  • Strong, W.R., Jr., B.D. Bruce, D.R. Nelson & R.D. Murphy. 1996. Population dynamics of white sharks in Spencer Gulf, South Australia. pp. 401–416. In: A.P. Klimley & D.G. Ainley (ed.) Great White Sharks, Academic Press, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tricas, T.C. 1982. Bioelectric-mediated predation by swell sharks Cephaloscyllium ventriosum. Copeia 1982: 948–952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tricas, T.C. & J.E. McCosker. 1984. Predatory behavior of the white shark, Carcharodon carcharias, and notes on its biology. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. 43: 221–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tricas, T.C. & J.G. New. 1998. Sensitivity and response dynamics of electrosensory primary afferent neurons to near threshold fields in the round stingray. J. Comp. Physiol. 182: 89–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tricas, T.C., S.W. Michael & J.A. Sisneros. 1995. Electrosensory optimization to conspecific phasic signals for mating. Neuroscience Letters 202: 129–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turingan, R.G & P.C. Wainwright. 1993. Morphological and functional bases of durophagy in the queen triggerfish, Balistes vetula (Pisces, Tetraodontiformes). J. Morphol. 215: 101–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wainwright, P.C. & S.M. Reilly. 1994. Ecological morphology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. 367 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westneat, M.W. 1995. Phyologenetric systematics and biomechanics in ecomorphology. Env. Biol. Fish. 44: 263–283.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tricas, T.C. The Neuroecology of the Elasmobranch Electrosensory World: Why Peripheral Morphology Shapes Behavior. Environmental Biology of Fishes 60, 77–92 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007684404669

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007684404669

Navigation