Skip to main content
Log in

Microhabitat Preferences and Movements of the Weatherfish, Misgurnus fossilis, in a Drainage Channel

  • Published:
Environmental Biology of Fishes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Habitat preferences and movements of the weatherfish, Misgurnus fossilis, were studied in a drainage channel of the lower River Havel region (Saxony-Anhalt) from July to November 1995. During summer, adult fish preferred dense vegetation patches (e.g. Elodea canadensis) whereas juveniles preferred the reed zones along the bank lines, characterized by coarse detritus and extremely shallow water depths (<0.1 m). All size groups totally avoided open substratum without vegetation structures. In total, 166 weatherfish ≥ 14 cm were marked individually by injected dyes and their movements were documented by recaptures (recapture rate 29%). Most of the weatherfish showed stationary behaviour or site constancy. The majority of fish (70.1%) were recaptured within ranges of 50 m with reference to the first release point. The mean movement distances slightly increased during the search for overwintering habitats in the first weeks of October. Weatherfish stocks in drainage channels of the study area are strongly affected by annual machine weeding due to depletion of suitable microhabitats and direct removal of fish. Alternative maintenance protocols for drainage channels and ditches are proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References cited

  • Balon, E.K. 1975. Reproductive guilds of fishes: a proposal and definition. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 32: 821–864.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bless, R., A. Lelek & A. Waterstraat. 1998. Rote Liste der in Binnengewässern lebenden Rundmäuler und Fische (Cyclostomata & Pisces). Schriftenreihe für Landschaftspflege und Naturschutz 55: 53–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blohm, H.-P., D. Gaumert & M. Kämmereit. 1994. Leitfaden für dieWieder-und Neuansiedlung von Fischarten. Binnenfischerei in Niedersachsen No. 3, Hildesheim. 90 pp.

  • Bohl, E. 1993. Rundmäuler und Fische im Sediment. Ökologische Untersuchungen an Bachneunauge (Lampetra planeri), Schlammpeitzger (Misgurnus fossilis) und Steinbeisser (Cobitis taenia) in Bayern. Berichte der Bayrischen Landesanstalt für Wasserforschung 22, Munich. 129 pp.

  • Brunken, H. 1984. Die Fischfauna im Einzugsbereich des Grossen Graben in Südostniedersachsen. Braunschweiger Naturkundliche Schriften 2: 219–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunken, H. 1987. Markieren von Kleinfischarten mit Acryl-Farben am Beispiel der Bachschmerle (Noemacheilus barbatulus L.). J. Applied Ichthyol. 3: 92–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunken, H. 1988. Ausbreitungsdynamik von Noemacheilus barbatulus (Linnaeus, 1758). Ph.D. Thesis, Technical University of Braunschweig, Braunschweig. 219 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copp, G.H. 1989. The habitat diversity and fish reproductive function of floodplain ecosystems. Env. Biol. Fish. 26: 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copp, G.H. 1992. Comparative microhabit use of cyprinid larvae and juveniles in a lotic floodplain channel. Env. Biol. Fish. 33: 181–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downhower, J.F., P. Lejeune, P. Gaudin & L. Brown. 1990. Movements of the chabot (Cottus gobio) in a small stream. Pol. Arch. Hydrobiol. 37: 119–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fusko, M. 1987. Zur Biologie des Schlammpeitzgers (Misgurnus fossilis L.) unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Darmatmung. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Vienna, Vienna. 172 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaumert, D. 1982. Gewässerunterhaltung und Fischartenschutz. Wasser & Boden 1: 19–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaumert, D. 1986. Kleinfische in Niedersachsen. Hinweise zum Artenschutz. Mitteilungen aus dem Niedersächsischen Landesamt für Wasserwirtschaft 4, Hildesheim. 71 pp.

  • Geldhauser, F. 1992. Die kontrollierteVermehrung des Schlammpeitzgers (Misgurnus fossilis, L.). Fischer & Teichwirt 1: 2–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollmann, H.P., E. Kainz & O. Fuchs. 1986. Zur Markierung von Fischen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Anwendung von Farbstoffen und Pigmenten, insbesondere von Alcianblau 8 GS. Österreichs Fischerei 39: 340–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinrichs, D. 1998. Einfluss der Gewässerunterhaltung auf die Fischfauna von Meliorationsgräben. Wasser & Boden 50(5): 22–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolly, G.M. 1965. Explicit estimates from capture-recapture data with both death and immigration-stochastic mode. Biometrika 52: 225–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Käfel, G. 1991. Autökologische Untersuchungen an Misgurnus fossilis im March-Thaya Mündungsgebiet. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Vienna, Vienna. 109 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knaak, J. 1960. Beitraege zur Biologie und Parasitenfauna der mitteleuropäischen Cobitiden. Ph.D. Thesis, Karl-Marx-University of Leipzig, Leipzig. 91 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laird, L.M. & B. Stott. 1978. Marking and tagging. pp. 84–100. In: T. Bagenal (ed.) Methods for Assessment of Fish Production in Fresh Waters, IBP Handbook No. 3, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lelek, A. 1987. Threatened fishes of Europe. The freshwater fishes of Europe Vol. 9, Aula-Verlag, Wiesbaden. 343 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieber, A. 1936. Der Jahreszyklus der Schilddrüse von Misgurnus fossilis L. und seine experimentelle Beeinflussbarkeit. Zeitschrift für wissenschaftliche Zoologie (Leipzig) 148: 364–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotrich, V.A. & W.H. Meredith. 1974. A technique and the effectiveness of various acrylic colors for subcutaneous marking of fish. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 103: 140–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penczak, T., M. Zalewski, E. Suszycka & M. Molinski. 1981. Estimation of the density, biomass and growth rate of fish populations in two small lowland rivers. Ekol. Pol. 29: 233–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolik, H. & J.M. Rembiszewski. 1987. Ryby i kragłouste (Pisces et Cyclostomata). Fauna Slodkowodna Polski 5 stwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warsaw. 314 pp.

  • Spillmann, C.J. 1961. Poissons d'eau douce. Faune de France 65, Editions Paul LeChevalier, Paris. 303 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterba, G. 1958. Die Schmerlenartigen (Cobitidae). pp. 201–234. In: R. Demoll, H.N. Maier & H.H. Wundsch (ed.) Handbuch der Binnenfischerei Mitteleuropas, Vol. 3B, Instalment 9, E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vladykov, V. 1928. Ñber sekundären Geschlechtsdimorphismus bei unseren Cobitiden. Zoologische Jahrbücher, Abteilung für Systematik, Ökologie und Geographie der Tiere 55(1/3): 147–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witkowski, A. 1984. Structure of communities and biomass of ichthyofauna in the Biebrza River, its old river beds and affluents. Polish Ecological Studies 10: 447–474.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meyer, L., Hinrichs, D. Microhabitat Preferences and Movements of the Weatherfish, Misgurnus fossilis, in a Drainage Channel. Environmental Biology of Fishes 58, 297–306 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007681313916

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007681313916

Navigation