Skip to main content
Log in

The Double Public Good: A Conceptual Framework for ``Shared Experience'' Values Associated with Heritage Conservation

  • Published:
Journal of Cultural Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper introduces the double public good model as a representation of the simultaneous externalities that complicate decision making in the cultural heritage sphere. Social welfare is modeled as depending on both public and private benefits of households' production of individual heritage experience, which in turn depends on the stock of historic assets (a public good) and access effort (a private good). The public benefit of private experience arises from ``shared experience'' that fosters cultural identity and social understandings. The model generates marginal efficiency conditions for the amount of physical preservation, amount of access, and intensity of access. The model highlights the need for dual-level policy making in order to avoid unbalanced heritage preservation efforts that have been of some concern in the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Becker, G.S. and Murphy, K.M. (1988) “A Theory of Rational Addiction”. Journal of Political Economy 96: 675-700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benhamou, F. (1996) “Is Increased Public Spending for the Preservation of Historic Monuments Inevitable? The French Case”. The Journal of Cultural Economics 20: 115-132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benhamou, F. (1997) “Conserving Historic Monuments in France: A Critique of Official Polices”, in M. Hutter and I. Rizzo (eds.), Economic Perspectives on Cultural Heritage. St. Martin's Press, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J.M. (1965) “An Economic Theory of Clubs”, in T. Cowen (ed.), The Theory of Market Failure: A Critical Examination. George Mason University Press, Fairfax, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures. Harper, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klamer, A. (1997) “The Value of Cultural Heritage”, in M. Hutter and I. Rizzo (eds.), Economic Perspectives on Cultural Heritage. St. Martin's Press, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koboldt, C. (1997) “Optimizing the Use of Cultural Heritage”, in M. Hutter and I. Rizzo (eds.), Economic Perspectives on Cultural Heritage. St. Martin's Press, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutter, M. and Rizzo, I. (eds.) (1997) Economic Perspectives on Cultural Heritage. St. Martin's Press, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévy-Garboua, L. and Montmarquette, C. (1996) “A Microeconomic Study of Theatre Demand”. Journal of Cultural Economics 20: 25-50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R.C. and Carson, R.T. (1989) Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Throsby, D. (1997) “Seven Questions in the Economics of Cultural Heritage”, in M. Hutter and I. Rizzo (eds.), Economic Perspectives on Cultural Heritage. St. Martin's Press, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sable, K.A., Kling, R.W. The Double Public Good: A Conceptual Framework for ``Shared Experience'' Values Associated with Heritage Conservation. Journal of Cultural Economics 25, 77–89 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007675701979

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007675701979

Navigation