Abstract
This paper introduces the double public good model as a representation of the simultaneous externalities that complicate decision making in the cultural heritage sphere. Social welfare is modeled as depending on both public and private benefits of households' production of individual heritage experience, which in turn depends on the stock of historic assets (a public good) and access effort (a private good). The public benefit of private experience arises from ``shared experience'' that fosters cultural identity and social understandings. The model generates marginal efficiency conditions for the amount of physical preservation, amount of access, and intensity of access. The model highlights the need for dual-level policy making in order to avoid unbalanced heritage preservation efforts that have been of some concern in the literature.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Becker, G.S. and Murphy, K.M. (1988) “A Theory of Rational Addiction”. Journal of Political Economy 96: 675-700.
Benhamou, F. (1996) “Is Increased Public Spending for the Preservation of Historic Monuments Inevitable? The French Case”. The Journal of Cultural Economics 20: 115-132.
Benhamou, F. (1997) “Conserving Historic Monuments in France: A Critique of Official Polices”, in M. Hutter and I. Rizzo (eds.), Economic Perspectives on Cultural Heritage. St. Martin's Press, Inc., New York.
Buchanan, J.M. (1965) “An Economic Theory of Clubs”, in T. Cowen (ed.), The Theory of Market Failure: A Critical Examination. George Mason University Press, Fairfax, VA.
Geertz, C. (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures. Harper, New York.
Klamer, A. (1997) “The Value of Cultural Heritage”, in M. Hutter and I. Rizzo (eds.), Economic Perspectives on Cultural Heritage. St. Martin's Press, Inc., New York.
Koboldt, C. (1997) “Optimizing the Use of Cultural Heritage”, in M. Hutter and I. Rizzo (eds.), Economic Perspectives on Cultural Heritage. St. Martin's Press, Inc., New York.
Hutter, M. and Rizzo, I. (eds.) (1997) Economic Perspectives on Cultural Heritage. St. Martin's Press, Inc., New York.
Lévy-Garboua, L. and Montmarquette, C. (1996) “A Microeconomic Study of Theatre Demand”. Journal of Cultural Economics 20: 25-50.
Mitchell, R.C. and Carson, R.T. (1989) Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.
Throsby, D. (1997) “Seven Questions in the Economics of Cultural Heritage”, in M. Hutter and I. Rizzo (eds.), Economic Perspectives on Cultural Heritage. St. Martin's Press, Inc., New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sable, K.A., Kling, R.W. The Double Public Good: A Conceptual Framework for ``Shared Experience'' Values Associated with Heritage Conservation. Journal of Cultural Economics 25, 77–89 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007675701979
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007675701979