Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Serological evidence of Cryptosporidium infections in southern Europe

  • Published:
European Journal of Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although cryptosporidiosis outbreaks have been frequently reported in the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom, few outbreaks have been reported on the European continent. The reasons for this are unclear. To ascertain whether a European population has been previously exposed to Cryptosporidium, we conducted a survey of 100 resident blood donors in a northern Italian city for IgG serological response to two oocyst antigen groups. A serological response to the 15/17-kDa antigen group was detected in 83% of blood donors and response to the 27-kDa antigen group in 62%. Donors who traveled outside of Italy during the prior 12 months were less likely to have had a response to the 15/17-kDa antigen group (p < 0.04) and to have a less intense response (p < 0.05). Older age was predictive of a more intense response to each antigen group (p < 0.01). The fraction of Italian blood donors with a serological response to either antigen group was higher than in four United States blood donor populations, with differences more pronounced for response to the 15/17-kDa antigen group (p < 0.01). A lower fraction of Italian donors had a serological response to either antigen group than persons tested at the time of a cryptosporidiosis outbreak in the United States or blood donors tested six months after that outbreak (p < 0.05). Since the presence of serological responses to these antigen groups predicts a reduced risk of cryptosporidiosis, the high prevalence of serological responses in these Italian blood donors may explain the infrequent occurrences of clinically detectable cryptosporidiosis in this city.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Meinhardt PL, Casemore DP, Miller KP. Epidemiologic aspects of human cryptosporidiosis and the role of waterborne transmission. Epidemiol Rev 1996; 18(2): 118–136.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dupont HL, Chappel CL, Sterling CR, et al. The infectivity of Cryptosporidium parvum in healthy volunteers. N Engl J Med 1995; 332: 855–859.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fayer R, Ungar BL. Cryptosporidium spp. and cryptosporidiosis. Microbiol Rev 50: 458–483.

  4. Lisle JT, Rose JB. Cryptosporidium contamination of water in the USA and UK: A mini-review. J Water SRT-Aqua 1995; 44(3): 1003–1017.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Craun GF, Hubbs SA, Frost F, Calderon RL, Via SH. Waterborne outbreaks of cryptosporidiosis. J Am Water Works Assoc 1998; 90(9): 81–91.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Casemore DP. Foodborne protozoal infection. Lancet 1990; 336: 1427–1432.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Moss DM, Chappel CL, Okhuysen PC, et al. The antibody response to 27–, 17–and 15–kDa Cryptosporidium antigens following experimental infection in humans. J Inf Dis 1998; 178: 827–833.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ungar BL, Soave R, Fayer R, Nash TE. Enzyme immunoassay detection of immunoglobulin M and G antibodies to Cryptosporidium in immunocompetent and immunocompromised persons. J Inf Dis 1986; 153: 570–578.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ungar BL, Milligan M, Nutman TB. Serologic evidence of Cryptosporidium infection in U.S. volunteers before and during Peace Corps service in Africa. Arch Intern Med 1989; 149: 894–897.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kuhls TJ, Mosier DA, Crawford DL, Griffs J. Seroprevalence of cryptosporidial antibodies during infancy, childhood and adolescence. Clinical Infectious Dis 1994; 18: 731–735.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Moss DM, Bennett SN, Arrowood MJ, Wahlquist SP, Lammie PJ. Enzymelinked immunoelectrotransfer blot analysis of a cryptosporidiosis outbreak on a United States Coast Guard cutter. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1998; 51(1): 110–118.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Frost FJ, de la Cruz AA, Moss DM, Curry M, Calderon RL. Comparisons of ELISA and Western blot assays for detection of Cryptosporidium antibody. Epidemiol Inf 1998; 121(1): 205–211.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Frost FJ, Calderon RL, Muller TM, et al. A two-year follow-up of antibody to Cryptosporidium in Jackson County, Oregon following an outbreak of waterborne disease. Epidemiol Inf 1998; 121(1): 213–217.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Frost FJ, Craun GF. Serological response to human Cryptosporidium infection (letter). Infect Immun 1998; 66(8): 4008.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Current WL, Bick PH. Immunobiology of Cryptosporidium spp. Path Immuno Res 1989; 8: 141–160.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Moss DM, Bennett SN, Arrowood MJ, Hurd MR, Lammie PJ, Wahlquist SP. Kinetic and isotypic analysis of specific immunoglobulins for crew members with cryptosporidiosis on a U.S. Coast Guard cutter. J Eukaryot Microbiol 1994; 41(5): 52S-55S.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Frost F, Muller T, Rodman J, Calderon R, Craun G. Study of serological response to two Cryptosporidium antigens in Las Vegas, Nevada and Albuquerque, New Mexico. In: Water Quality Technology Conference, November 9–12, 1997, Denver, CO: America Water Works Association, 1997, pp. 1–13. ISSN 0164–0755.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Frost F, Muller T. Two City Cryptosporidium Study. American Water Works Association Research Foundation: Denver, CO, 1998. ISSN 1055–9140.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Frost F, Craun GF, Calderon R, Hubbs SA. So many oocysts. So few outbreaks. J Amer Water Works Assoc 1997; 89(12): 8–10.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frost, F., Fea, E., Gilli, G. et al. Serological evidence of Cryptosporidium infections in southern Europe. Eur J Epidemiol 16, 385–390 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007654226975

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007654226975

Navigation