Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental investigation of shared storage assignment policies in automated storage/retrieval systems

  • Published:
IIE Transactions

Abstract

In this study, two shared storage assignment policies are compared in an Automated Storage/Retrieval System (AS/RS) by using computer simulation. The AS/RS is assumed to operate under a continuous review, order quantity, reorder point inventory policy. The average travel time of the AS/R machine for storing and retrieving products is used as the main performance measure. Sensitivity of the system to product variety, inventory replenishment lead time, and demand rate is investigated, as well as the effects of the inventory policy and the product classification technique used. Our main conclusion is that the turnover-based policy, in general, outperforms the duration of stay-based policy. However, the difference between the performance of the two policies becomes insignificant under certain conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goetschalckx, M. and Ratli., H.D. (1990) Shared storage policies based on the duration of stay of unit loads. Management Science, 36, 1120–1132.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Heskett, J.L. (1963) Cube-per-order index: a key to warehouse stock location. Transportation and Distribution Management, 3, 27–31.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Heskett, J.L. (1964) Putting the cube-per-order index to work in warehouse layout. Transportation and Distribution Management, 4, 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hodgson, T.J. and Lowe, T.J. (1980) Lotsizing in automated warehouse, in Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Inventories, pp. 99–108.

  5. Hodgson, T.J. and Lowe, T.J. (1982) Production lotsizing with material handling cost consideration. IIE Transactions, 14, 44–51.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mallette, A.J. and Francis, R.L. (1972) A generalized assignment approach to optimal facility layout. AIIE Transactions, 4, 144–147.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hausman, W.H., Schwarz, L.B. and Graves, S.C. (1976) Optimal storage assignment in automatic warehousing systems. Management Science, 22, 629–638.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Graves, S.C., Hausman, W.H. and Schwarz, L.B. (1977) Storage-retrieval interleaving in automatic warehousing systems. Management Science, 23, 935–945.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Schwarz, L.B., Graves, S.C. and Hausman, W.H. (1978) Scheduling policies for automatic warehousing systems: simulation results. AIIE Transactions, 10, 260–270.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Roll, Y. and Rosenblatt, M.J. (1983) Random versus grouped storage policies and their effect on warehouse capacity. Material Flow, 1, 199–205.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rosenblatt, M.J. and Roll, Y. (1984) Warehouse design with storage policy considerations. International Journal of Production Research, 22, 809–821.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rosenblatt, M.J. and Eynan, A. (1989) Deriving the optimal boundaries for class-based automatic storage/retrieval systems. Management Science, 35, 1519–1524.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Eynan, A. and Rosenblatt, M.J. (1994) Establishing zones in single-command class-based rectangular AS/RS. IIE Transactions, 26, 38–46.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Francis, R.L., Mcginnis, Jr., L.F., and White, J.A. (1992) Facility Layout and Location: An Analytical Approach, Prentice-Hall, Engelwood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hwang, H. and Lee, S.B. (1990) Travel time models considering the operating characteristics of the storage and retrieval machine. International Journal of Production Research, 28, 1779–1789.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chang, D.T., Wen, U.P. and Lin, J.T. (1995) The impact of acceleration/deceleration on travel- time models for automated storage/retrieval systems. IIE Transactions, 27, 108–111.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Linn, R.J. and Wysk, R.A. (1990) An expert system based controller for an automated storage/retrieval system. International Journal of Production Research, 28, 735–756.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Linn, R.J. and Wysk, R.A. (1990) An expert system framework for automated storage/retrieval system control. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 18, 37–48.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lee, F.L. (1997) Performance analysis for automated storage and retrieval systems. IIE Transactions, 29, 15–28.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bozkurt, Z., Sepil, C. and Ozdemirel, N.E. (1995) Experimental investigation of the di.erent storage assignment policies in the end-of-aisle systems. Technical report No. 95-16, Industrial En-gineering Department, METU, Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bozkurt, Z. (1995) Experimental investigation of the di.erent shared storage assignment policies in the end-of-aisle AS/R systems. Unpublished M.S. thesis, Industrial Engineering Department, METU, Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hadley, G. and Whitin, T.M. (1963) Analysis of Inventory Systems. Prentice-Hall, Engelwood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kulturel, S. (1996) Experimental investigation of two shared storage assignment policies AS/RS under continuous review (Q,r) inventory policy. Unpublished M.S. thesis, Industrial Engineering Department, METU, Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Montgomery, D.C. (1991) Design and Analysis of Experiments, 3rd Edn, John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kulturel, S., Ozdemirel, N.E., Sepil, C. et al. Experimental investigation of shared storage assignment policies in automated storage/retrieval systems. IIE Transactions 31, 739–749 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007654111952

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007654111952

Keywords

Navigation