Skip to main content
Log in

Host Imprinting in Anemonefishes (Pisces: Pomacentridae): Does it Dictate Spawning site Preferences?

  • Published:
Environmental Biology of Fishes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The olfactory cues, to which some species of anemonefish embryos imprint, are secreted in the mucus on the tentacles and the oral disc of the host anemone. Close contact of the eggs of anemonefishes with the host's tentacles seems therefore important to imprinting. A corollary of this observation is that if local environmental conditions sweep tentacles in one specific direction, then the eggs will be placed leeward of the tentacles, rather than to foremost way from the tentacles. Other known factors such as egg predation can also cause a spawning site preference. No study has examined the possibility of the existence of such a preference. In this study, we addressed two questions: (1) Does spawning site preference exist in anemonefishes? (2) If yes, is it possible to relate this to the imprinting hypothesis, i.e. does local ocean currents over the host anemone have any influence on this preference? Two different coral reef areas were surveyed for anemonefish groups with eggs present: Eilat and Na'ama in the Aquaba-bight, the Red Sea (RS), and areas at Lizard Island, the northern Great Barrier Reef (GBR). We found the anemonefishes Amphiprion akindynos (GBR), A. bicinctus (RS), A. melanopus (GBR), and A. perideraion (GBR), to have a distinctive spawning site preference. We discuss the relevance of these findings to anemonefish host imprinting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References cited

  • Allen, G.R. 1975. The anemonefishes. Their classification and biology, 2nd ed. T.F.H. Publications, Neptune City. 352 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arvedlund, M. & L.E. Nielsen. 1996. Do the anemone-fish Amphiprion ocellaris (Pisces: Pomacentridae) imprint themselves to their host sea anemone Heteractis magnifica (Anthozoa: Actinidae)? Ethology 102: 197–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arvedlund, M., M. McCormick, D.G. Fautin & M. Bildsøe. 1999. The anemonefish Amphiprion melanopus (Bleeker) (Pisces: Pomacentridae): a study of host detection and possible imprinting. Mar. Ecol Prog. Ser. 188: 207–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, L.J. 1976. Notes on the nesting success and fecundity of the anemonefish Amphiprion clarkii at Miyake-jima, Japan. Japan. J. Ichtyol. 22: 207–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, D.F. 1981. The clownfish sea anemones. Stichodactylidae (Coelenterata: Actinaria) and other sea anemones symbiotic with pomacentrid fishes. Trans. Amer. Phil. Soc. 71: 1–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, J.K., J.M. Elliott & R.N. Mariscal. 1995. Host selection, location, and association behaviors of anemonefishes in field settlement experiments. Marine Biology 122: 377–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • English, S., C. Wilkinson & V. Baker (ed.). 1997. Survey manual for tropical marine resources, 2nd edition, Vol. 1. Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville. 390 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fautin, D.G. 1991. The anemonefish symbiosis: what is known and what is not. Symbiosis 10: 23–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fautin, D.G. & G.R. Allen. 1992. Field guide to anemone-fishes and their host sea anemones, 1st ed. Western Australian Museum, Perth. 160 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischelson, L. 1965. Observations and experiments on the Red Sea anemones and their symbiotic fish Amphiprion bicinctus. Bull. Sea Fish. Res. Stat. 39: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fricke, H.W. 1974. Öko-Ethologie des monogamen Anemonen-fisches Amphiprion bicinctus (Freiwasseruntersuchungen aus dem Roten Meer). Z. Tierpsychol. 36: 429–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Job, S., M. Arvedlund & M. Marnane. 1997. Culture of coral reef fishes. Austasia Aquacult. 11: 56–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konno, K., G. Qin & K. Nakanishi. 1990. Synthesis of Amphikuemin and Analogs: a synomome that mediates partner-recognition between anemonefish and sea anemones. Heterocycles 30: 247–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyagawa, K. & T. Hidaka. 1980. Amphiprion clarkii juvenile: innate protection against and chemical attraction by symbiotic sea anemones. Proc. Japan. Acad. 56(B): 356–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyagawa, K. 1989. Experimental analysis of the symbiosis between anemonefishes and sea anemones. Ethology 80: 19–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyer, J.T. 1980. Influence of temperate waters on behaviour of the tropical anemonefish Amphiprion clarkii at Miyake-jima, Japan. Bull. Mar. Sci. 30: 261–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyer, J.T. & L.J. Bell. 1976. Reproductive behavior of the anemonefish Amphiprion clarkii, of Miyake-Jima, Japan. Japan. J. Ichtyol. 23: 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyer, J.T. & R.C. Steene. 1979. Nesting behavior of the Anemonefish Amphiprion polymnus. Japan. J. Ichtyol. 26: 209–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murata, M., K. Miyagawa-Koshima, K. Nakanishi & Y. Naya. 1986. Characterization of compounds that induce symbiosis between sea anemone and anemonefish. Science 234: 585–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, R.M. 1978. Reproductive behavior of the anemonefish Amphiprion melanopus on Guam. Copeia 1978: 103–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar, J.H. 1996. Biostatistical analysis, 3rd ed. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River. 662 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arvedlund, M., Bundgaard, I. & Nielsen, L.E. Host Imprinting in Anemonefishes (Pisces: Pomacentridae): Does it Dictate Spawning site Preferences?. Environmental Biology of Fishes 58, 203–213 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007652902857

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007652902857

Navigation