Skip to main content
Log in

Peer Networking as a Dynamic Approach to Supporting New Faculty

  • Published:
Innovative Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article presents a dynamic method of supporting new faculty through a peer support group led by a facilitator. Group members participate in ongoing self-assessment, individualized goal setting, and activities that reflect the changing needs of the group. We explain the history and activities of the group and also the benefits for institutions considering developing a support mechanism for new faculty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, J. C. (1992). Mentoring: On the road to tenure and promotion. Association for Communication Administration Bulletin, 79, 54–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women's ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergen, D., & Connelly, J. (1988). The collegial research mentor project: A model for faculty research and scholarship development. Career Planning and Adult Development Journal, 4, 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, P., & Boice, B. (1998). Systematic mentoring for new faculty teachers and graduate teaching assistants. Innovative Higher Education, 22, 157–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, R. K. (1992). Faculty development: The nature and benefits of Mentoring. Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 56, 71–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaskill, L. R. (1993). A conceptual framework for the development, implementation, and evaluation of formal mentoring programs. Journal of Career Development, 20, 147–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, L. D., Stevens, E. A., & Bellamy, G. T. (1998). Mentoring among faculty in schools, colleges, and departments of education. Journal of Teacher Education, 49, 334–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnish, D., & Wild, L. A. (1994). Mentoring strategies for faculty development. Studies in Higher Education, 19, 191–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, J. (1994). A formal mentoring program for junior female faculty. Initiatives, 56(2), 37–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsrud, L. K., & Atwater, C. D. (1993). Scaffolding the ivory tower: Building supports for faculty new to the academy. CUPA Journal, 44, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, J. J. (1992). Establishing a faculty mentoring program. Association for Communication Administration Bulletin, 79, 59–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kram, K. E. (1985). Improving the mentoring process. Training and Development Journal, 39, 40–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, A. A., Boyd, M. A., & Brunette, D. M. (1991). Mentoring and pretenure faculty development. Journal of Dental Education, 55, 665–678.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, M. S., & Schapiro, M. O. (1999). Tenure issues in higher education. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13, 84–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullaney, J. W., & Timberlake, E. M. (1994). University tenure and the legal system: Procedures, conflicts, and resolutions. Journal of Social Work Education, 30, 172–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, G. T., & Maxcy, S. J. (1994, October). Mentoring to build diversity in the university community. Paper presented at the Convention of the University Council for Educational Administration, Philadelphia, PA.

  • Olian, J. D., Carroll, S. J., Giannantonio, C. M., & Feren, D. B. (1988). What do proteg´es look for in a mentor? Results of three experimental studies. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 33, 15–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, G. (1998). Developing new university faculty through mentoring. Journal of Humanistic Education and Development, 37, 27–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragins, B. R., & Cotton, J. L. (1999). Mentor functions and outcomes: A comparison of men and women in formal and informal mentoring relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 529–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragins, B. R., & Cotton, J. L. (1991). Easier said than done: Gender differences in perceived barriers to gaining a mentor. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 939–951.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorcinelli, M. D. (1994). Effective approaches to new faculty development. Journal of Counseling and Development, 72, 474–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. Clair, K. L. (1994). Faculty-to-faculty mentoring in the community college: An instructional component of faculty development. Community College Review, 22(3), 23–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunsch, M. (1994). Giving structure to experience: Mentoring strategies for women faculty. Initiatives, 56(1), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, J.O., Whitman, J.S., Grant, P.A. et al. Peer Networking as a Dynamic Approach to Supporting New Faculty. Innovative Higher Education 25, 197–207 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007651632485

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007651632485

Navigation