Skip to main content
Log in

Estimating incidence of bacterial meningitis with capture–recapture method, Lazio Region, Italy

  • Published:
European Journal of Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To estimate the incidence of bacterial meningitis in the Lazio Region, including the city of Rome, and to assess the quality of the surveillance systems, we adopted a multiple-capture model by merging cases from three sources available in 1995–1996: the Notifiable Disease Surveillance (NDS) system, the Special Hospital Surveillance (SHS) system and the Hospital Discharge (HD) registry. A medical record revision was carried out to confirm the cases of bacterial meningitis. A total of 199 individuals was classified as probable or confirmed cases of bacterial meningitis in 1995–1996. In this period, the incidence of reported meningitis was 3.8/100,000 (population = 5,209,633). The log–linear model yielded a total estimated number of 236 cases (95% confidence interval (CI): 206–306), the estimate of incidence reaching the value of 4.5/100,000. Hospital Discharge registry showed the highest sensitivity (77%), the SHS system the highest positive predictive value (83%). In 1997–1998, the meningitis surveillance was integrated with an additional laboratory-based source and yielded 326 cases, with an incidence of reported cases of 6.3/100,000. Laboratory surveillance, involving 115 (92%) public hospitals and 84 (57%) private clinics, contributed 35 (27%) cases in addition to those notified to NDS (n = 130). Multiple-capture models, in our experience could estimate the bacterial meningitis incidence with a very good approximation. In order to improve both sensitivity and positive predictive value of surveillance, hospital and public health sources should be integrated with laboratory-based system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tunkel AR, Scheld WM. Acute meningitis. In: Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R (eds), Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett's Principles and Practices of Infectious Diseases, 5th edn. Vol 1. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone, 2000: 959–997.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Seber GAF. The Estimation of Animal Abundance and Related Parameters. New York: Hafner Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Craigh S. Capture-recapture methods in epidemiological studies. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1996; 17: 262–266.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hook EB, Regal RR. Capture-recapture methods in epidemiology: methods and limitations. Epidemiol Rev 1995; 17(2): 243–264.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ackman DM, Birkhead G, Flynn M. Assessment of surveillance for meningococcal disease in New York State, 1991. Am J Epidemiol 1996; 144: 78–82.

    Google Scholar 

  6. McGilchrist CA, McDonnell LF, Jorm LR, Patel MS. Loglinear models using capture-recapture methods to estimate the size of a measles epidemic. J Clin Epidemiol 1996; 49: 293–296.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Abeni DD, Brancato G and Perucci CA. Capture-recapture to estimate the size of the population with human immunodeficency virus type 1 infection. Epidemiology 1994; 5: 410–414.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ministero della Sanità, Decreto 15 dicembre 1990. Sistema Informativo delle Malattie Infettive e Diffusive. Roma: Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Center for Disease Control. Case definitions for infectious conditions under public health surveillance. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1997; 46 (No. RR-10): 15, 24, 44.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Regal RR, Hook EB. Goodness-of-fit based confidence intervals for estimates of the size of a closed population. Stat Med 1984; 3: 287–291.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hook EB, Regal RR. Validity of methods for model selection, weighing for model uncertainty, and small sample adjustment in capture-recapture estimation. Am J Epidemiol 1997; 145: 1138–1144.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Public Health Laboratory Service. Bacterial meningitis in Europe: Surveillance report for 1995. CDR Weekly 1997; 7: 119–122.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wenger JD, Hightower AW, Facklam RR, Gaventa S, Broome CV and the Bacterial Meningitis Study Group. Bacterial meningitis in the United States 1986: Report of a multistate surveillance study. J Infect Dis 1990; 162: 1316–1323.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Madsen KM, Schønheyder HC, Kristensen B, Nielsen GL, Sørensen HT. Can hospital discharge diagnosis be used for surveillance of bacteremia? A data quality study of a Danish hospital discharge registry. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1998; 19: 175–180.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Public Health Laboratory Service. Bacteriaemia and bacterial meningitis in Englend and Wales: 1982 to 1996. CDR Weekly 1997; 7: 275, 278.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Connolly M, Noah N. Surveillance of Bacterial Meningitis in Europe 1996. King's College London, October 1997.

  17. Salmaso S, Mastrantonio P, Scuderi G, et al. Pattern of bacterial meningitis in Italy, 1994. Eur J Epidemiol 1997; 13: 317–321.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Noah N, Connolly M. Surveillance of Bacterial Meningitis in Europe 1995. King's College London, December 1996.

  19. Sørensen HT, Sabroe S, Hansen I, Schønheyder HC, Ejlersen E, Hamburger H. Re: "Assessment of surveillance for meningococcal disease in New York State, 1991". Am J Epidemiol 1998; 147: 606–607.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rivest P, Sagot B, Bedard L. Evaluation of the completeness of reporting of invasive meningococcal disease. Can J Public Health 1999; 90: 250–252.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Faustini, A., Fano, V., Sangalli, M. et al. Estimating incidence of bacterial meningitis with capture–recapture method, Lazio Region, Italy. Eur J Epidemiol 16, 843–848 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007650317852

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007650317852

Navigation