International Journal of Fracture

, Volume 102, Issue 4, pp 393–410 | Cite as

A comparative study of dynamic, ductile fracture initiation in two specimen configurations

  • Sumit Basu
  • R. Narasimhan


In this work a single edge notched plate (SEN(T)) subjected to a tensile stress pulse is analysed, using a 2D plane strain dynamic finite element procedure. The interaction of the notch with a pre-nucleated hole ahead of it is examined. The background material is modelled by the Gurson constitutive law and ductile failure by microvoid coalescence in the ligament connecting the notch and the hole is simulated. Both rate independent and rate dependent material behaviour is considered. The notch tip region is subjected to a range of loading rates J by varying the peak value and the rise time of the applied stress pulse. The results obtained from these simulations are compared with a three point bend (TPB) specimen subjected to impact loading analysed in an earlier work [3]. The variation of J at fracture initiation, Jc, with average loading rate J is obtained from the finite element simulations. It is found that the functional relationship between Jc and J is fairly independent of the specimen geometry and is only dependent on material behaviour.

Dynamic ductile fracture initiation finite elements microvoid coalescence specimen configuration. 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Priest, A.H. (1976). Influence of strain rate and temperature on the fracture and tensile properties of several metallic materials. In Proc. Intl. Conf. on Dynamic Fracture Toughness, 95–111 Welding Institute, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cox, T.B. and Low, J.R. (1974). An investigation of the plastic fracture of AISI 4340 and 18Ni-200 grade maraging steels. Metall. Trans. 5, 1457–1470.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Basu, S. and Narasimhan, R. (1999) A finite element study of the effects of material characteristics and crack tip constraint on dynamic, ductile fracture initiation. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 47, 325–350.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pan, J., Saje, M. and Needleman, A. (1983). Localisation of deformation in rate sensitive porous plastic solids. Int J. Fracture 21, 261–278.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rice, J.R. and Johnson, M.A. (1970). The role of large geometry changes in plane strain fracture. In Inelastic Behaviour of Solids(Edited by Kanninen, M.F., Adler, A.R., Rosenfield, A.R. and Jaffe, R.I.), pp. 641–672. McGraw Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Aravas, N. and McMeeking, R.M. (1985). Finite element analysis of void growth near a blunting crack tip. J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 33, 25–49.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ghosal, A.K. and Narasimhan, R. (1997) A finite element study of the effect of void initiation and growth on mixed-mode ductile fracture. Mech. Mater. 25, 113–127.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Costin, L. S., Duffy, J. and Freund, L. B. (1985). Fracture initiation in metals under stress wave loading conditions. In Fast Fracture and Crack Arrest, ASTM STP 627, pp. 310–318.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Homma, H., Shockey, D. A. and Murayama, Y. (1983). Response of cracks in structural materials to short pulse loads. J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 31, 261–279.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Owen, D., Zhuang, S., Rosakis, A. J. and Ravichandran, G. (1998) Experimental determination of dynamic crack initiation and propagation fracture toughness in thin aluminium sheets. Int. J. Fracture 90, 153–174.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Owen, D., Rosakis, A.J., and Johnson, W.L. (1998). Dynamic failure mechanisms in Berillium-bearing bulk metallic glasses. SM Report 98–22, GALCIT, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, U.S.A.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Freund, L. B. (1990). Dynamic Fracture Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Guduru, P. R., Singh, R. P., Ravichandran, G. and Rosakis, A. J. (1997). Dynamic crack initiation in ductile steels. GALCIT Report, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, U.S.A.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Venkert, A., Guduru, P. R. and Ravichandran, G. (1998). Mechanisms of dynamic failure in Ni-Cr steels. SM Report 98–5, GALCIT, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, U.S.A.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gurson, A.L. (1977). Continuum theory of ductile rupture by void nucleation and growth – Part I. J. Engng. Mat. Tech. 99, 2–15.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Basu, S. and Narasimhan, R. (1996). Finite element simulation of Mode I dynamic, ductile fracture initiation. Int. J. Solids Struct. 33, 1191–1207.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brown, L.M. and Embury, J.D. (1973). Initiation and growth of voids at second phase particles. In Proc. Third Intl. Conf. on Strength of Metals and Alloys, pp. 164–179. Inst. of Metals, London.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Andersson, H. (1977). Analysis of a model for void growth and coalescence ahead of a moving crack tip. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 25, 217–233.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tvergaard, V. (1982). Influence of void nucleation on ductile shear fracture at a free surface. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 30, 399–415.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Thomason, P.F. (1990). Ductile fracture of metals. Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chu, C.C. and Needleman, A. (1980). Void nucleation effects in biaxially stretched sheets. J. Engng. Mat. Tech. 102, 249–256.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Needleman, A. (1988). Material rate dependence and mesh sensitivity in localization problems. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engng. 67, 69–85.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Needleman, A. and Tvergaard, V. (1994). Mesh effects in the analysis of dynamic, ductile crack growth. Engng. Fracture Mech. 47, 75–91.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Narasimhan, R. and Rosakis, A. J. (1990). Three-dimensional effects near a crack tip in a ductile three-point bend specimen: Part I-A numerical investigation. Trans. ASME J. Appl. Mech. 57, 607–617.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Narasimhan, R., Rosakis, A. J. and Moran, B. (1992). A three-dimensional numerical investigation of fracture initiation by ductile failure mechanisms in a 4340 steel. Int. J. Fracture. 56, 1–24.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Narasimhan, R. (1994). A numerical study of static and dynamic fracture initiation in a ductile material containing a dual population of second phase particles. Engng. Fracture Mech. 47, 919–948.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Belytshko, T. (1983). In Computational Methods for Transient Analysis(edited by Belytshko, T. and Hughes, T. J. R), Elsevier, Amsterdam, p. 1.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nakamura, T., Shih, C. F. and Freund, L. B. (1986) Analysis of a dynamically loaded three-point bend ductile fracture specimen. Engng. Fracture Mech. 25, 333–339.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Al-Ani, A. M. and Hancock, J. W. (1991). J-dominance of short cracks in tension and bending. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 29, 23–43.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    O'Dowd, N. P. and Shih, C. F. (1991). Family of crack-tip fields characterized by a triaxiality parameter – I. Structure of fields. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 39, 989–1015.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    O'Dowd, N. P. and Shih, C. F. (1992). Family of crack-tip fields characterized by a triaxiality parameter – II. Fracture applications. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 40, 939–963.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Basu, S. and Narasimhan, R. (1999). A numerical investigation of loss of crack tip constraint in a dynamically loaded ductile specimen. To appear in J. Mech. Phys. Solids.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kanninen, M. F. and Popelar, C. H. (1985). Advanced fracture mechanics, Oxford University Press, pp. 550–551.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Shih, C.F. (1981). Relationship between J-integral and the crack opening displacement for stationary and extending cracks. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 29, 305–326.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sumit Basu
    • 1
  • R. Narasimhan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringIndian Institute of ScienceBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations