Skip to main content
Log in

The Language in Chinese Mathematical Texts Before AD 1300: A Case for Logical Abstraction

  • Published:
Interchange Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While there seems to be a general consensus that literacy should include the ability to deal with basic reading, writing, and arithmetic, a view is growing that literacy is in fact more than equipping learners with sets of essential skills (Wells, 1981; Schoenfeld, 1985; Bereiter & Scardamalia, 1987; Cumming, 1990; Wells & Chang-Wells, 1992). Olson (1994) reviews in his book The World on Paper a large number of studies in the field of psychology, sociology, history, and linguistics and concludes that modern literacy in the West is characterized by a new way of looking at written texts and the representation the texts project. In the contemporary East, while many countries including China are striving for economic development and modernization, the question of why science and modernity did not first develop in some oriental cultures such as China, which used to be the most advanced, remains interesting but unanswered. In the light of Olson's discussion regarding literacy and Western modernity, this paper adopts a cognitive-linguistic perspective and examines the social conditions in which ancient Chinese mathematics struggled to develop. Examples and experiences in ancient Chinese mathematical texts are presented to reveal the close relationship between modernity, literacy, and written language. In response to a new interest in a context-rich approach to mathematics teaching, the paper also discusses its implications for the mathematics curriculum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Bell, E.T. (1945). The development of mathematics. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C. & Scardamalia, M. (1987). An attainable version of high literacy: Approaches to teaching higher-order skills in reading and writing. Curriculum Inquiry, 17(1), 9–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C. & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. Chicago, IL: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, C.C. (1977). Western mathematics comes of age. New York: Doubleday & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, J.N. & Lun, A.W.C. (1991). The logic of Liu Hui and Euclid. Victoria, Australia: Department of Mathematics, Monash University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumming, A. (1990). The thinking, interactions, and participation to foster in adult ESL literacy instruction. TESL TALK, 21(1), 34–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denny, J.P. (1991) Rational thought in oral culture. In D.R. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), Literacy and orality (pp. 66–89). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstein, E. (1979). The printing press as an agent of change. Cambridge University press.

  • Guo, Shuchun (1994). zhongguo gudai shuxue (Ancient Chinese Mathematics.) Taipei, Taiwan: Taiwan Commercial Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R, (1989). How does writing restructure thought? Language & Communication, 9(2/3), 99–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ifrah, G. (1985). From one to zero: A universal history of numbers. Translated by Lowell Bair. Harrisonburg, Virginia: R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, M. (1973). Why Johnny can't add: The failure of the new math. New York: St. Martin's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, L.Y. & Ang, T.S. (1992). Fleeting footsteps: Tracing the conception of arithmetic and algebra in ancient China. New Jersey: World Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y. & Du, S. (1987). Chinese mathematics: A concise history. Translated by J.N. Crossley & A.W.C. Lun. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, G. (1996). Science in antiquity. In D.R. Olson & N. Torrance. (Eds.), Modes of thought: Explorations in culture and cognition (pp. 15–22). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G.H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Needham, J. (1959). Science and civilization in China, Vol. 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, J.R. (1956). The world of mathematics. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D.R. (1991a). Literacy as metalinguistic activity. In D.R. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), Literacy and orality (pp. 251–270). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D.R. (1991b). Literacy and objectivity: The rise of modern science. In D.R. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), Literacy and orality (pp. 149–164). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D.R. (1994). The world on paper. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, I. (1975) Concepts of modern mathematics. Middlesex, England: Pelican Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull, H.W. (1962). The great mathematicians. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G. (1981). Language, literacy and education. In C.G. Wells (Ed.), Learning through interaction (pp. 240–276). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G. & Chang-Wells, G.L. (1992). Constructing knowledge together: Classrooms as centers of inquiry and literacy. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tong, A.K. The Language in Chinese Mathematical Texts Before AD 1300: A Case for Logical Abstraction. Interchange 30, 433–458 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007603129020

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007603129020

Navigation