Skip to main content
Log in

Markov Processes and Discrete Multifractals

  • Published:
Mathematical Geology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fractals and multifractals are a natural consequence of self-similarity resulting from scale-independent processes. Multifractals are spatially intertwined fractals which can be further grouped into two classes according to the characteristics of their fractal dimension spectra: continuous and discrete multifractals. The concept of multifractals emphasizes spatial associations between fractals and fractal spectra. Distinguishing discrete multifractals from continuous multifractals makes it possible to describe discrete physical processes from a multifractal point of view. It is shown that multiplicative cascade processes can generate continuous multifractals and that Markov processes result in discrete multifractals. The latter result provides not only theoretical evidence for existence of discrete multifractals but also a fundamental model illustrating the general properties of discrete multifractals. Classical prefractal examples are used to show how asymmetrical Markov process can be applied to generate prefractal sets and discrete multifractals. The discrete multifractal model based on Markov processes was applied to a dataset of gold deposits in the Great Basin, Nevada, USA. The gold deposits were regarded as discrete multifractals consisting of three spatially interrelated point sets (small, medium, and large deposits) yielding fractal dimensions of 0.541 for the small deposits (<25 tons Au), 0.296 for the medium deposits (25--500 tons Au), and 0.09 for the large deposits (>500 tons Au), respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Agterberg, F. P., 1993, Calculation of the variance of mean values for blocks in regional resource evaluation studies: Nonrenewable Resources, v. 2, no. 4, p. 312–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agterberg, F. P., 1994, Fractals, multifractals, and change of support, in Dimitrakopoulos, R., ed., Geostatistics for the next century: Kluwer Academic Publ., Dordrecht, p.223–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agterberg, F. P., 1997, How nature works: The science of self-organized criticality, by Per Bak, book review: Computers & Geosciences, v. 24, no. 2, p. 205–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agterberg, F. P., Cheng, Q., and Wright, D. F., 1993, Fractal modeling of mineral deposits, in Elbrond, J., and Tang, X., eds., Application of computers and operations research in the mineral industry: Proc. 24th APCOM Symposium (Montreal), Can. Inst. Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum Eng., v. 1, p. 43–53.

  • Andrle, R., 1996, Complexity and scale in geomorphology: Statistical self-similarity vs. characteristics scales: Math. Geology, v. 28, no. 3, p. 275–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atmanspacher, H., Scheingraber, H., and Wiedenmann, G., 1989, Determination of f (α) for a limited random point set, Phys. Rev., v. 40, p. 3954–3963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bak, P., 1996, How nature works: Springer-Verlag, New York, 212 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Q., 1994, Multifractal modeling and spatial analysis with GIS: Gold potential estimation in the Mitchell-Sulphurets area, northwestern British Columbia: unpubl. doctoral dissertation, The School of Graduate Studies and Research of Univ., Ottawa, 268 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Q., 1997a, Discrete multifractals: Math. Geology, v. 29, no. 2, p. 245–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Q., 1997b, Fractal ?multifractal modeling and spatial analysis, in V. Pawlowsky-Glahn, ed., Proc. IAMG'97: Barcelona, Spain, Sept. 22–27, v. 1, p. 57–72.

  • Cheng, Q., and Agterberg, F. P., 1995, Multifractal modeling and spatial point processes: Math. Geology, v. 27, no. 7, p. 831–845.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Q., and Agterberg, F. P., 1996a, Multifractal modeling and spatial statistics: Math. Geology, v. 28, no. 1, p. 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Q., and Agterberg, A. F., 1996b, Comparison between two types of multifractal modeling: Math. Geology, v. 28, no. 8, p. 1001–1015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Q., Agterberg, F. P., and Ballantyne, S. B., 1994, The separation of geochemical anomalies from background by fractal methods: Jour. Geochemical Exploration, v. 51, no. 2, p. 109–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chhabra, A. B., and Sreenivasan, K. R., 1991, Negative dimensions: Theory, computation and experiment: Phys. Rev. A, v. 43, no. 2, p. 1114–1117.

    Google Scholar 

  • ESRI Inc., 1996, ARC ?INFO Unix Version 7.

  • Evertsz, C. J. G., and Mandelbrot, B. B., 1992, Multifractal measures, in Peitgen, H.-O., Jörgens, H., and Saupe, D., eds., Chaos and fractals: Springer-Verlag, New York, p. 922–953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feder, J., 1988, Fractals: Plenum, New York, 283 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, V. K., and Waymire, E. C., 1993, A statistical analysis of mesoscale rainfall as a random cascade: American Meteorological Society, v. 32, p. 251–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halsey, T. C., Jensen, M. H., Kadanoff, L. P., Procaccia, I., and Shraiman, B. I., 1986, Fractal measures and their singularities. The characterization of strange sets: Phys. Rev. A, v. 33, no. 2, p. 1141–1151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavallée, D., Schertzer, D., and Lovejoy, S., 1991, On the determination of the codimension function, in Schertzer, D., and Lovejoy, S., eds., Non-linear variability in geophysics: Kluwer Academic Publ., Dordrecht, p. 99–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy, S., and Schertzer, D., 1991, Multifractal analysis techniques and the rain and cloud fields from 10?3 to 106 m, in Schertzer, D., and Lovejoy, S., eds., Non-linear variability in geophysics: Kluwer Academic Publ., Dordrecht, p. 111–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot, B. B., 1983, The fractal geometry of nature (updated and augmented edition): W. H. Freeman and Company, New York, 468 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot, B. B., and Evertsz, C. J. G., 1991, Exactly self-similar left-sided multifractals, in Bunde, A., and Havlin, S., eds., Fractals and disordered systems: Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, p. 323–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meneveau, C., and Sreenivasan, K. R., 1987, Simple multifractal cascade model for fully developed turbulence: Phys. Rev. Lett., v. 59, no. 13, p. 1424–1427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schertzer, D., and Lovejoy, S., 1987, Physically based rain and cloud modeling by anisotropic, multiplicative turbulent cascades: J. Geophys. Res., v. 92, no. D8, p. 9693–9714.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schertzer, D., and Lovejoy, S., eds., 1991a, Non-linear variability in geophysics: Kluwer Academic Publ., Dordrecht, 318 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schertzer, D., and Lovejoy, S., 1991b, Nonlinear geodynamical variability: Multiple singularities, universality and observations, in Schertzer, D., and Lovejoy, D., eds., Non-linear variability in geophysics: Kluwer Academic Publ., Dordrecht, p. 41–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schertzer, D., and Lovejoy, S., 1992, Hard and soft multifractal processes: Physica A, v. 185, nos. 1–4, p. 187–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, H., and Meakin, P., 1988, Multifractal phenomena in physics and chemistry: Nature, v. 335, no. 6189, p. 405–409.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cheng, Q. Markov Processes and Discrete Multifractals. Mathematical Geology 31, 455–469 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007594709250

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007594709250

Navigation