Skip to main content
Log in

Microcosm–Macrocosm

  • Published:
Group

Abstract

Much has been learned in the 20th century about the impact of covert group dynamics on the individual, the family and small group on the micro level and about institutions, communities, national and international process on a macro level. However, as we enter the new millennium this knowledge seems dwarfed by the burgeoning of knowledge about the brain and biological approaches to disturbed human behavior, casting a worrisome shadow on the future of dynamic group therapies. This article explores the impact of socio-economic-political forces on mental health delivery systems from the vantage point of group process and therapy, and raises questions about possible interventions to restore a balance between social dynamics and biology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Bion, W. R. (1961). Experiences in groups. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bion, W. R. (1991). A memoir of the future. London: Karnac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, M. (1978). Family therapy in clinical practice. New York: Jason Aranson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breggin, P. (1991). Toxic psychiatry. New York: St. Martin's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, O., & Zinkin, L. (Eds.) (1994). The psyche and the social world. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Mare, P., Piper, R., & Thomson, S. (1991). Koinonia. London: Karnac Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelson, M., & Berg, D. (1999). Rediscovering groups. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ettin, M. (1995). The spirit of Jungian group psychotherapy. IJGP, 45(4), 449–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, S., & Greenberg, S. (Eds.). (1997). From placebo to panacea. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1965). Madness and civilization. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foulkes, S. H. (1986). Therapeutic group analysis. London: Karnac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1955). Group psychology and the analysis of the ego. In J. Strachey (Ed.). The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, XVIII (pp. 67–143). London: The Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukeyama, F. (1989). The end of history? National Interest, 16, 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galt, A. (Ed.). (1984). Trigant Burrow, toward social sanity and human survival: Selections from his writings. New York: Horizon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere. Cambridge: Ma: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinselwood, R. C. (1994). Attacks on reflective space. In V. Shermer & M. Pines (Eds.), Ring of Fire. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopper, E. (1993). Discussions on the large group. Group, 17(4), 221–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, R. (1983). The repression of psychoanalysis. New York: Basic Books, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, C. G. (1961). Memories dreams and reflections. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, J. (1977). Ecrits: A selection (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Norton

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, W. G., Bain, A., & Gould, L. (1996). The fifth basic assumption. Free Associations, 6, 25–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, W. G. (1998). Unconscious social pressures on leaders. In E. Klein, F. Gablenick, & P. Herr (Eds.), The psychodynamics of leadership. Madison Connecticut: Psychosocial Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lash, C. (1979). The culture of narcissism. New York: W.B. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, H. (1977). The dilemma of human identity. New York: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidz, T., & Fleck, S. (1965). Schizophrenia and the family. New York: International University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Main, T. F. (1975). Some psychodynamics of large groups. In L. Kreeger (Ed.), The large group. London: Constable.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mender, D. (1994). The myth of neuropsychiatry. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, S. A. (1988). Relational concept in psychoanalysis. Cambridge, Ma: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nitsun, M. (1996). The Anti-Group. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pines, M., & Schermer, V. (1994). An editorial introduction. In V. Shermer & M. Pines (Eds.), Ring of fire. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanton, A., & Schwartz, M. (1954). The mental hospital. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turquet, P. (1974). Leadership: The individual and the group. In G. S. Gabbard (Ed.), Analysis of Groups. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker, D. S., & Lieberman, M. A. (1964). Psychotherapy through the group process. New York: Atherton Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Skolnick, M. Microcosm–Macrocosm. Group 24, 133–145 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007575714300

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007575714300

Navigation