Journal of Quantitative Criminology

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 75–80 | Cite as

Impossible Policy Evaluations and Impossible Conclusions: A Comment on Koper and Roth

  • Gary Kleck


Policy Evaluation Impossible Conclusion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Britt, C., Kleck, G., and Bordua, D. (1996). A reassessment of the D.C. gun law: Some cautionary notes on the use of interrupted time series designs for policy impact assessment. Law Soc. Rev. 30: 361–380.Google Scholar
  2. Cook, P., and Ludwig, J. (1997). Guns in America, Police Foundation, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  3. Kleck, G. (1997). Targeting Guns: Firearms and Their Control, Aldine de Gruyter, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Kleck, G. (2000). Policy magic: Reducing gun homicide by banning guns killers almost never use, Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
  5. U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation (1995). Crime in the United States 1994-Uniform Crime Reports. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  6. U.S. National Center for Health Statistics (1996). Advance report of final mortality statistics, 1994. Month. Vital Stat. Rep. 45(3, Suppl.): 1–63.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gary Kleck
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Criminology and Criminal JusticeFlorida State UniversityTallahassee

Personalised recommendations