Advertisement

Journal of Family Violence

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 229–248 | Cite as

The Process of Recovery and Rebuilding among Abused Women in the Conservative Evangelical Subculture

  • Norman Giesbrecht
  • Irene Sevcik
Article

Abstract

This study utilized a naturalistic methodology to develop a “grounded theory” of the process of recovery and rebuilding among abused women situated in the conservative evangelical subculture. Among all the women, spirituality and church participation were an integral part of their identity and generated culture-specific issues that needed to be addressed in therapy. The women's faith functioned as a meaning-making framework that could either engender shame and guilt or inspire hope and empower transformative change. The church functioned as an extended family system that could minimize, deny, and enable abuse or provide much-needed social support, spiritual encouragement, and practical assistance. The recovery process required that these women rebuild their personal and spiritual identity, redefine their relationship with the religious community, and find ways of expressing their new identity within the religious subculture.

recovery abused women conservative evangelical subculture spirituality 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Beaman-Hall, L., and Nason-Clark, N. (1997a). Partners or protagonists? The transition house movement and conservative churches. Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work 12: 176–179.Google Scholar
  2. Beaman-Hall, L., and Nason-Clark, N. (1997b). Translating spiritual commitment into service: The response of evangelical women to wife abuse. Canadian Women Studies 17: 58–61.Google Scholar
  3. Brinkerhof, M. B., Grandin, E., and Lupri, E. (1992). Religious involvement and spousal violence: The Canadian case. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 31: 15–31.Google Scholar
  4. Calhoun, C., Light, D., and Keller, S. (1997). Sociology, 7th ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Devore, W., and Schlesinger, E. G. (1991). Ethnic-Sensitive Social Work Practice, 3rd ed. Merrill, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Dobash, R. E., and Dobash, R. P. (1979). Violence Against Women: A Case Against the Patriarchy. The Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Dobson, J. (1996). Love Must Be Tough: New Hope for Families in Crisis. Word, Dallas, TX.Google Scholar
  8. Fire in the Rose Project. (1994). What Is Abuse? Facts and Stories. The Canadian Council on Justice and Corrections, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  9. Fortune, M. (1991). Violence in the Family: A Workshop Curriculum for Clergy and Other Helpers. The Pilgrim Press, Cleveland, Ohio.Google Scholar
  10. Fortune, M. (1993). The nature of abuse. Workshop on sexual abuse and domestic violence. Pastoral Psychology 41: 275–288.Google Scholar
  11. Glaser, B. C. (1978). Theoretical Sensitivity, Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA.Google Scholar
  12. Glaser, B. C., and Strauss, A. L. (1967). TheDiscovery of Grounded Theory, Aldine, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Horton, A., and Williamson, J. (eds.) (1988). Abuse and Religion: When Praying Isn't Enough. James Lorimer and Company, Toronto.Google Scholar
  14. Hull, D., and Burke, J. (1991). The religious right, attitudes toward women, and tolerance for sexual abuse. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation 17: 1–12.Google Scholar
  15. Jaffe, P., Wolfe, D., and Wilson, S. (1990). Children of Battered Women, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.Google Scholar
  16. Minuchin, S., and Fishman, H. C. (1981). Family Therapy Techniques, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  17. Nason-Clark, N. (1997a). The Battered Wife: How Christians Confront Family Violence. Westminster/John Knox Press, Louisville, KY.Google Scholar
  18. Nason-Clark, N. (1997b). Shattered silence or holy hush: Emerging definitions of violence against women in sacred and secular context. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Religious Research Association, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  19. Noll, M. A. (1994). The Scandal of the Evangelical Mind, William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, Grand Rapids, MI.Google Scholar
  20. Pargament, K. I., Maton, K. I., and Hess, R. E. (eds.) (1987). Religion and Prevention in Mental Health: Research, Vision, and Action. The Haworth Press, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Rey, L. D. (1997). Religion as invisible culture: Knowing about and knowing with. Journal of Family Social Work 2(2): 159–177.Google Scholar
  22. Satir, V. (1983). Conjoint Family Therapy, Science and Behavior Books, Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
  23. Statistics Canada. (1993). The violence against women survey. The Daily. Catalogue 11–00IE, November 18.Google Scholar
  24. Stander, V., Piercy, F. P., MacKinnon, D., and Helmeke, K. (1994). Spirituality, religion and family therapy: Competing or complementary worlds? American Journal of Family Therapy 22: 27–41.Google Scholar
  25. Strauss, A. L., and Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage, Newbury Park, CA.Google Scholar
  26. Thomas, D. L., and Cornwall, M. (1990). Religion and family in the 1980's: Discovery and development. Journal of Marriage and the Family 52(4): 983–992.Google Scholar
  27. United Nations Office at Vienna, Centre for Social Development and Humanitarian Affairs. (1989). Violence against women in the family. (Sales No. E.89IV.5). United Nations Publication, New York.Google Scholar
  28. Whipple, V. (1987). Counseling battered women from fundamentalist churches. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 13: 251–258.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Norman Giesbrecht
    • 1
  • Irene Sevcik
    • 2
  1. 1.Postdoctoral fellow (Psychology)University of British ColumbiaUK
  2. 2.Discovery HouseCalgary

Personalised recommendations