Skip to main content
Log in

Fostering a “Group Ethos”: Truth or Dare!

  • Published:
Group

Abstract

A “group ethos” permeates the two Special Issues of Group dedicated to “the future of group psychotherapy in the 21st century.” This ethos is elaborated through a parable, an integration of authors' conclusions, and a brief exploration of the myths and basic assumptions about group leadership and followership that characterized the 20th century. A new basic assumption is proposed for the 21st. BaC suggests that members are drawn to groups for the unconscious collaboration necessary to discover something between them, as yet untold—something that may hold the key to their own fates and to the human condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Bion, W. R. (1961). Experiences in groups and other papers. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clottes, J., & Lewis-Williams, D. (1998). The shamans of prehistory: Trance and magic in the painted caves. New York: Harry N. Abrams, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, B. D., Ettin, M., & Fidler, J. (1998). Conceptions of leadership: The “analytic stance” of the group psychotherapist. Group Dynamics, 2(2), 118–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, B. D., Ettin, M., & Fidler, J. (In press). Group psychotherapy and political reality: A two-way mirror. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.

  • Dalal, F. (1998). Taking the group seriously: Toward a post-Foulkesian group analytic theory. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Chardin, P. T. (1964). The future of man. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Mare, P., Piper, R., & Thompson, S. (1991). Koinonia: From hate, through dialogue to culture in the large group. London: Karnac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ettin, M. (1994). Symbolic representation and the components of a group-as-a-whole model. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 44(2), 209–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ettin, M. (1995a). From one to another: Group consultation for group psychotherapy, Group, 19(1), 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ettin, M. (1995b). The spirit of Jungian group psychotherapy: From taboo to totem. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 45(4), 449–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ettin, M. (1998). The deep structure of group life: Unconscious realms. Presented at International Congress of Group Psychotherapy, London. Paper version in preparation.

  • Ettin, M. (2000). From identified patient to identifiable group: The alchemy of the group as a whole. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 50(2), 137–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ettin, M., Fidler, J., & Cohen, B. (1995). Group process and political dynamics. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foulkes, S. H. (1964). Therapeutic group analysis. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1967/1918). Totem and taboo. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1967/1922). Group psychology and the analysis of the ego. New York: Liveright.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1987). A phylogenetic fantasy: Overview of the transference neuroses. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glantz, K., & Pearce, J. (1989). Exiles from Eden: Psychotherapy from an evolutionary perspective. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopper, E. (1996). The social unconscious in clinical work. Group, 20(1), 7–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopper, E. (1997). Traumatic experience in the unconscious life of groups: A fourth basic assumption. Group Analysis, 30(4), 439–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanzer, M. (1983). Freud: The first psychoanalytic group leader. In H. Kaplan & B. Sadock (Eds.). Comprehensive group psychotherapy (2nd ed., pp. 8–14). Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, S. (1988). Relational concepts in psychoanalysis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nitsun, M. (1996). The Anti-Group: Destructive forces in the group and their creative potential. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, P. (1974). Alive. New York: Avon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. (1975). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, A. (1949). The psychoanalysis of groups. I. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 4, 16–50.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ettin, M.F. Fostering a “Group Ethos”: Truth or Dare!. Group 24, 229–240 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007544202005

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007544202005

Navigation