Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Methodological problems and the role of statistics in cluster response studies: A framework

  • Published:
European Journal of Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

More and more citizens urge public health authorities to investigate reports of disease excess in their neighbourhood. These environmental concerns are legitimate and it is part of good public health practice to respond to these complaints. However, the methodological and practical problems are severe and a lot of controversy exists about the usefulness of these investigations. To clarify the possibilities and limitations in this situation, this paper proposes a typology of cluster studies. According to this framework, cluster response is distinguished from two other types of cluster studies: Cluster monitoring, screening proactively for clusters to act as an early warning system, and cluster research, scrutinizing clustering to generate and test aetiological hypotheses. To each of these three types of cluster studies corresponds a different public health context; respectively public health action, public health surveillance and public health research. Probably, part of the controversy mentioned stems from not acknowledging sufficiently the corresponding intrinsic differences in rationality and practical constraints. Cluster response is crisis management and not scientific research. In a relatively short time, an informed decision should be taken by a multidisciplinary team of experts using readily available information and knowledge. In accordance with this point of view, cluster reports should be handled stepwise and the role of statistics is to quantify a cluster exploring different points of view as an input to the decision process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alexander FE, Cuzick J. Methods for the assessment of disease clusters. In: Elliott P, Cuzick J, English D, Stern R (eds), Geographical and environmental epidemiology. Methods for small-area studies. Oxford: OUP, 1992: 238–250.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rothenberg RB, Thacker SB. Guidelines for the investigation of clusters of adverse health events. In: Elliott P, Cuzick J, English D, Stern R (eds), Geographical and environmental epidemiology. Methods for small-area studies. Oxford: OUP, 1992: 264–277.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bender AP, Williams AN, Johnson RA, Jagger HG. Appropriate public health responses to clusters: The art of being responsibly responsive. Am J Epidemiol 1990; 132: S48–52.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rothman KJ. A sobering start for the cluster busters' conference [see Comments]. Am J Epidemiol 1990; 132: S6–13.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Neutra RR. Counterpoint from a cluster buster. Am J Epidemiol 1990; 132: 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wartenberg D. Should we boost or bust cluster investigations? [Editorial]. Epidemiology 1995; 6: 575–576.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Thacker SB, Berkelman RL. Public health surveillance in the United States. Epidemiol Rev 1988; 10: 164–190.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cuzick J, Elliott P. Small-area studies: Purpose and methods. In: Elliott P, Cuzick J, English D, Stern R (eds), Geographical and environmental epidemiology. Methods for small-area studies. Oxford: OUP, 1992: 14–21.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lilienfeld DE, Stolley PD. Foundations of epidemiology. 3rd ed. New York, Oxford: OUP, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dolk H. The role of the assessment of spatial variation and clustering of birth defects in environmental surveillance. In: Anonymous EUROCAT Workshop on Clustering, 1997.

  11. Day R, Ware JH, Wartenberg D. An investigation of a reported cancer cluster in Randolph, Massachusetts. J Clin Epidemiol 1989; 42: 137–150.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Eylenbosch WJ, Noah ND. Surveillance in health and disease. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lie RT, Vollset SE, Botting B, Skjaerven R. Statistical methods for surveillance of congenital malformations: When do the data indicate a true shift in the risk that an infant is affected by some type of malformation? Int J of Risk & Safety in Medicine 1991; 2: 289–300.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Anonymous. Congenital malformations worldwide. A report from the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Monitoring Systems. A Non-Governmental Organization of the World Health Organization. Amsterdam, New York, Oxford: Elsevier, 1991.

  15. Jensen OM, Parkin DM, MacLennan R, Muir CS, Skeet RG. Cancer registration: Principles and methods. Lyon: IARC, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Elliott P, Martuzzi M, Shaddick G. Spatial statistical methods in environmental epidemiology: A critique. Stat Meth in Medical Research 1995; 4: 139–161.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Khoury MJ, Holtzman NA. On the ability of birth defects monitoring to detect new teratogens. Am J Epidemiol 1987; 126: 136–143.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dolk H, De Wals P. Congenital anomalies. In: Elliott P, Cuzick J, English D, Stern R (eds), Geographical and environmental epidemiology. Methods for small-area studies. Oxford: OUP, 1992: 72–88.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cornel MC, Erickson JD, Khoury MJ, James LM, Liu Y. Population-based birth-defect and risk-factor surveillance: Data from the Northern Netherlands. Int J of Risk & Safety in Medicine 1996; 8: 197–209.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ten Kate LP, Cornel MC, de Walle HEK. Monitoring of risk factor/outcome combinations: A valuable supplement to birth defect monitoring. Int J of Risk & Safety in Medicine 1992; 3: 129–136.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Erickson JD. Risk factors for birth defects: Data from the Atlanta birth defects case-control study. Teratology 1991; 43: 41–51.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Khoury MJ, Botto L, Mastroiacovo P, Skjaerven R, Castilla E, Erickson JD. Monitoring for multiple congenital anomalies: An international perspective. Epidemiol Rev 1994; 16: 335–350.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Olsen SF, Martuzzi M, Elliott P. Cluster analysis and disease mapping — why, when, and how? A step by step guide. Br Med J 1996; 313: 863–866.

    Google Scholar 

  24. English D. Geographical epidemiology and ecological studies. In: Elliott P, Cuzick J, English D, Stern R (eds), Geographical and environmental epidemiology. Methods for small-area studies. Oxford: OUP, 1992: 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  25. McCullagh P, Nelder JA. Generalized linear models. 2nd ed. London: Chapman and Hall, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Drijver M. Ziekteclusters in relatie tot milieuverontreiniging. In: Anonymous, Leiden: 1989: 1–25.

  27. Chen R, Connelly RR, Mantel N. Analysing post-alarm data in a monitoring system in order to accept or reject the alarm. Stat Med 1993; 12: 1807–1812.

    Google Scholar 

  28. De Wals P, Niyonsenga T, Laguë J. [Investigation of cluster of adverse reproductive outcomes: Theoretical and practical aspects]. Arch Public Health 1996; 54: 43–58.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wartenberg D, Greenberg M. Solving the cluster puzzle: Clues to follow and pitfalls to avoid. Stat Med 1993; 12: 1763–1770.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jacquez GM, Waller LA, Grimson R, Wartenberg D. The analysis of disease clusters, Part I: State of the art. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1996; 17: 319–327.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Jacquez GM, Grimson R, Waller LA, Wartenberg D. The analysis of disease clusters, Part II: Introduction to techniques. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1996; 17: 385–397.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wartenberg D, Greenberg M. Detecting disease clusters: The importance of statistical power. Am J Epidemiol 1990; 132: S156–66.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Waller LA, Jacquez GM. Disease models implicit in statistical tests of disease clustering. Epidemiology 1995; 6: 584–590.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Grimson RC, Wang KC, Johnson PWC. Searching for hierachical clusters of disease: Spatial patterns of sudden infant death syndrome. Soc Sci Med 1981; 15d: 287–293.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Grimson RC, Rose RD. A versatile test for clustering and a proximity analysis of neurons. Methods Inf Med 1991; 30: 299–303.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Knox G. The detection of space-time interactions. Appl Stat 1964; 13: 25–30.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Knox EG. Leukaemia clusters in Great Britain. 1. Space-time interactions. J Epidemiology and Community Health 1992; 46: 566–572.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Mantel N. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 1967; 27: 209–220.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Jacquez GM. Statistical software for the clustering of health events. Stat Med 1996; 15: 951–952.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Elliott P, Shaddick G, Kleinschmidt I, Walls P, Beresford J, et al. Cancer incidence near municipal solid waste incinerators in Great Britain. Br J Cancer 1996; 73: 702–710.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. EUROCAT, Central Registry, Brussels, Belgium

    P.K.M. Quataert

  2. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, U.K

    B. Armstrong

  3. EUROCAT registry, Styria, Austria

    A. Berghold

  4. EUROCAT registry Florence and CNR Institute of Clinical Physiology, Pisa, Italy

    F. Bianchi

  5. Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland

    A. Kelly

  6. University of Florence, Italy

    M. Marchi

  7. IARC, Lyon, France

    M. Martuzzi

  8. International Centre for Birth Defects (ICBD), Rome, Italy

    A. Rosano

Authors
  1. P.K.M. Quataert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B. Armstrong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. Berghold
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. F. Bianchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. Kelly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. M. Marchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. M. Martuzzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. A. Rosano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Quataert, P., Armstrong, B., Berghold, A. et al. Methodological problems and the role of statistics in cluster response studies: A framework. Eur J Epidemiol 15, 821–831 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007537813282

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007537813282

Search

Navigation