Mathematical Geology

, Volume 32, Issue 2, pp 231–245 | Cite as

Godzilla from a Zoological Perspective

  • Per Christiansen


The 1998 TriStar movie Godzilla proved to be a major blockbuster, although not the financial success that was initially anticipated and movie critics have been rather unforgiving. Apart from a radically different external morphology compared to the classic Japanese movie monster, the new Godzilla character apparently was made different from the old version on a number of key points to make him more biologically probable. However, calculations show that his limbs and limb muscles must have been severely undersized to move his huge bulk around at even a leisurely pace, and most other biological problems with the old Godzilla, e.g., growth rates and reptilian physiology at such a massive size, have remained unaltered. The old Godzilla was actually the more plausible from a biomechanical point of view.

Godzilla size body mass biomechanics physiology 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alexander, R. McN., 1985, Mechanics of posture and gait of some large dinosaurs: Zool. Jour. Linnean Soc., v. 83, p. 1–25.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, R. McN., 1989, Dynamics of Dinosaurs and Other Extinct Giants: Columbia University Press, New York, 167 p.Google Scholar
  3. Alexander, R. McN., 1991, How dinosaurs ran: Sci. Am., v. 264, no. 4, p. 62–68.Google Scholar
  4. Alexander, R. McN., Maloiy, G. M. O., Hunter, B., Jayes, A. S., and Nturibi, J., 1979, Mechanical stresses in fast locomotion of buffalo (Syncerus caffer) and elephant (Loxodonta africana): Jour. Zool., v. 189, no. 2, p. 135–144.Google Scholar
  5. Alexander, R. McN., and Pond, C. M., 1992, Locomotion and bone strength of the white rhinoceros Ceratotherium simum: Jour. Zool., v. 227, no. 1, p. 63–69.Google Scholar
  6. Bakker, R. T., 1972, Anatomical and ecological evidence of endothermy in dinosaurs: Nature, v. 238, no. 5359, p. 81–85.Google Scholar
  7. Bakker, R. T., 1975, Dinosaur renaissance: Sci. Am., v. 232, no. 4, p. 58–78.Google Scholar
  8. Bertram, J., and Biewener, A. A., 1990, Differential scaling of the long bones in the terrestrial Carnivora and other mammals: Jour. Morphol., v. 204, no. 2, p. 157–169.Google Scholar
  9. Biewener, A. A., 1989a, Scaling body support in mammals: Limb posture and muscle mechanics: Science, v. 245, no. 4913, p. 45–48.Google Scholar
  10. Biewener, A. A., 1989b, Mammalian terrestrial locomotion and size: Bioscience, v. 39, no. 11, p. 776–783.Google Scholar
  11. Biewener, A. A., 1990, Biomechanics of mammalian terrestrial locomotion: Science, v. 250, no. 4984, p. 1097–1103.Google Scholar
  12. Carrano, M. T., 1998, Locomotion in non-avian dinosaurs: Integrating data from hindlimb kinematics, in vivo strains, and bone morphology: Paleobiol., v. 24, n. 4, p. 450–469.Google Scholar
  13. Case, T. J., 1978, Speculations on the growth rate and reproduction of some dinosaurs: Paleobiol., v. 4, no. 3, p. 320–328.Google Scholar
  14. Christiansen, P., 1997, Locomotion in sauropod dinosaurs: GAIA, v. 14, p. 45–75.Google Scholar
  15. Christiansen, P., 1999a, Scaling of the limb long bones to body mass in terrestrial mammals: Jour. Morphol., v. 239, no. 2, p. 167–190.Google Scholar
  16. Christiansen, P., 1999b, Scaling of mammalian long bones: Small and large mammals compared: Jour. Zool., v. 247, no. 3, p. 333–348.Google Scholar
  17. Christiansen, P., 1999c, Strength indicator values of theropod long bones, with comments on limb proportions and cursorial potential: GAIA, in press.Google Scholar
  18. Christiansen, P., 1999d, Long bone scaling and limb posture in non-avian theropods: Evidence for differential allometry: Jour. Vertebrate Paleontol., v. 19, no. 4, p. 666–680.Google Scholar
  19. Chabreck, R. H., and Joanen, T., 1979, Growth rates of American alligators in Louisiana: Herpetologica, v. 35, no. 1, p. 51–57.Google Scholar
  20. Chua-Eoan, H., 1998a, What in the name of Godzilla: arts.cinema.what_in_11.htmlGoogle Scholar
  21. Chua-Eoan, H., 1998b, Godzilla redux: arts.cinema.godzilla25.htmlGoogle Scholar
  22. Coulson, T. D., Coulson, R. A., and Hernandez, T., 1973, Some observations on the growth of captive alligators: Zoologica, v. 58, p. 47–52.Google Scholar
  23. Ebert, R., 1998, Godzilla (review): Scholar
  24. Else, P. L., and Hulbert, A. J., 1981, Comparison of the “mammal machine” and the “reptile machine”: Energy production: Am. Jour. Physiology, v. 240, p. R3–R9.Google Scholar
  25. Else, P. L., and Hulbert, A. J., 1987, Evolution of mammalian endothermic metabolism: “Leaky” membranes as a source of heat: Am. Jour. Physiology, v. 253, p. R1–R7.Google Scholar
  26. Erickson, G. M., and Brochu, C. A., 1999, How the “terror crocodile” grew so big: Nature, v. 398, no. 6724, p. 205–206.Google Scholar
  27. Farlow, J. O., Smith, M. B., and Robinson, J. M., 1995, Body mass, bone “strength indicator,” and cursorial potential of Tyrannosaurus rex: Jour. Vertebrate Paleontol., v. 15, no. 4, p. 713–725.Google Scholar
  28. Gambaryan, P. P., 1974, How mammals run: John Wile & Sons, New York, 367 p.Google Scholar
  29. Goldberg, B., 1998, The “plot” [such as it is]: Scholar
  30. Kleiber, M., 1932, Body size and metabolism: Hilgardia, v. 6, p. 315–353.Google Scholar
  31. McMahon, T. A., 1975, Allometry and biomechanics: Limb bones in adult ungulates: Am. Naturalist, v. 109, no. 969, p. 547–563.Google Scholar
  32. McNab, B. K., 1983, Energetics, body size, and the limits to endothermy: Jour. Zool., v. 199, p. 1–29.Google Scholar
  33. McNab, B. K., 1986, The influence of food habits on the energetics of eutherian mammals: Ecological Monographs, v. 56, no. 1, p. 1–19.Google Scholar
  34. Nagy, K. A., 1987, Field metabolic rate and food requirement scaling in mammals and birds: Ecological Monographs, v. 57, no. 2, p. 111–128.Google Scholar
  35. Nowak, R. M., 1991, Walker's mammals of the world: Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, 1629 p.Google Scholar
  36. Orwall, B., 1998, Film producers play cat and mouse game with a giant lizard: Scholar
  37. Paul, G. S., 1988, Predatory dinosaurs of the world. A complete illustrated guide: Simon Schuster, New York, 464 p.Google Scholar
  38. Paul, G. S., 1997, Dinosaur models, the good, the bad, and using them to estimate the mass of dinosaurs, in Wolberg, D. L., and Stump, E., eds., DinoFest International proceedings: The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, PA, p. 129–154.Google Scholar
  39. Regal, P. J., and Gans, C., 1980, The revolution in thermal physiology: Implications for dinosaurs, in Thomas, R. D. K., and Olson, E. C., eds., A cold look at the warmblooded dinosaurs, AAAS Selected Symposium, Westview Press, Boulder, CO, vol. 1, p. 167–188.Google Scholar
  40. Ruben, J., 1995, The evolution of endothermy in mammals and birds: From physiology to fossils: Annual Review of Physiology, v. 37, p. 69–95.Google Scholar
  41. Ryan, J., 1998, Godzilla fans breathe fire over new movie:,1,3052,00.htmlGoogle Scholar
  42. Schmidt-Nielsen, K., 1990, Animal physiology: Adaptation and environment, 4th ed.: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 602 p.Google Scholar
  43. Spotila, J. R., O'Connor, M. P., Dodson, P., and Paladino, F. V., 1991, Hot and cold running dinosaurs: Body size, metabolism, and migration: Modern Geology, v. 16, p. 203–227.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association for Mathematical Geology 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Per Christiansen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of VertebratesZoological MuseumCopenhagen Ø.Denmark

Personalised recommendations