Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Clusters of birth defects: Emergency and management. A review of some publications

  • Published:
European Journal of Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Published reports of clusters of congenital anomalies, traditionally defined as an aggregation in time and/or space of malformed cases, are interesting to analyse in terms of emergence, management and initiator of a public health decision. Through some examples of clusters for which a suspected source has been suggested, for those having identified important causal relationship or for those where the cluster appeared without any explanation, the paper shows the different steps that were taken after the initial ‘alarm’ and the time spent between the alarm and a final conclusion. If basic keys such as accurate field investigation, reliable estimation of the expected number and etiological evaluation, are the rule, the handling should remain flexible to take into account the particularity of each cluster. Among the clusters of congenital anomalies published in the last 20 years, very few of them were clearly explained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cuzick J. Commentary: Clustering of anophtalmia and microphtalmia is not supported by the data. Br Med J 1998; 317: 910.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Read D, Borman B. Investigating clusters of non-communicable disease. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Health, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kallen B. Epidemiology of human reproduction. CRP Press, Inc., 1988.

  4. Warburton D, Kline J, Stein Z, et al. Trisomy cluster in New York. Lancet 1977; ii: 201.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pai GS, Valle D, Thomas G, et al. Cluster of trisomy 13 live births. Lancet 1978; i: 613.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Barsel-Bowers G, Pueschel SM, Abuelo DN, et al. A cluster of infants born with trisomy 18. N Engl J Med 1980; 302: 120.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Paneth N, Lansky M, Hiatt MI, et al. Congenital malformation clusters in eastern United States. Lancet 1980; ii: 808–809.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Paneth N, Kiely M, Hegyi Th, et al. Investigation of a temporal cluster of left sided congenital heart disease. J Epidemiol Community Health 1984; 38: 340–344.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brown NA, Kao J, Fabro S. Teratogenic potential of valproic acid. Lancet 1990; ii: 660.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gomez MR. Possible teratogenicity of valproic acid. J Pediatr 1981; 98: 508–509.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Robert E, Guibaud P. Maternal valproic acid and congenital neural tube defects. Lancet 1982; ii: 937

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bjerkedal T, Czeizel A, Goujard J, et al. Valproic acid and spina bifida. Lancet 1982; ii: 1096.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Valproate and malformations. Lancet 1982; ii: 1313–1314 (Editorial).

  14. Castilla E. Valproic acid and spina bifida. Lancet 1983; ii: 683.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mastroiacovo P, Bertollini R, Morandini S, Segni G. Maternal epilepsy, valproate exposure and birth defects. Lancet 1983; ii: 1499.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Robert E, Rosa F. Valproate and birth defects. Lancet 1983; ii: 1142.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rosa FW. Teratogenicity of isotretinoin. Lancet 1983; ii: 513.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lammer EJ, Chen DT, Hoar RM, et al. Retinoic acid embryopathy. N Engl J Med 1985; 313: 837–841.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Aymé S, Julian Cl, Gambarelli D, et al. Isotretinoin dose and teratogenicity. Lancet 1988; i: 655.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lyndberg, Khoury M, Lammer EJ. Sensibility, specificity and positive predictive value of multiple malformations in isotretinoin embryopathy surveillance. Teratology 1990; 42: 513–519.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Czeizel AE, Elek C, Gundy S, et al. Environmental trichlorfon and cluster of congenital abnormalities. Lancet 1993; 341: 539–542.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Handysides S. Reports of anophtalmia under scrutiny. Br Med J 1993; 306: 416.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dolk H, Elliott P. Evidence for ‘cluster of anophtalmia’ is thin. Br Med J 1993; 307: 203.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gilbert R. 'Clusters’ of anophtalmia in Britain. Difficult to implicate benomyl on current evidence. Br Med J 1993; 307: 340–341.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bianchi F, Calabro A, Calzolari E, et al. Clusters of anophtalmia. No link with benomyl in Italy. Br Med J 1994; 308: 205.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kristensen P, Irgens LM. Clusters of anophtalmia. No link with benomyl in Norway. Br Med J 1994; 308: 205–206.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Castilla E. Clusters of anophtalmia. No further clues from global investigation. Br Med J 1994; 308: 206.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Botting BJ. Limb reduction defects and coastal areas. Lancet 1994; 343: 1033–1034.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Castilla E. Limb reduction defects and coastal areas. Lancet 1994; 343: 1034.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mastroiacovo P, Botto L, Fusco D. Limb reduction defects and coastal areas. Lancet 1994; 343: 1034–1035.

    Google Scholar 

  31. International Clearinghouse for Birth defects Monitoring Systems. Annual report 1992, ICBDMS ed. 1993.

  32. International Clearinghouse for Birth defects Monitoring Systems. Annual report 1993, ICBDMS ed. 1994.

  33. Dolk H, Busby A, Armstrong BG, Walls PH. Geographical variation in anophtalmia and microphtalmia in England, 1988–1994. Br Med J 1998; 317: 905–909.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Abenhaim L, Lert F. Methodological issues for the assessment of clusters of adverse pregnancy outcome in the workplace: The case of video display terminal users. J Occupational Medicine 1991; 33: 1091–1096.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Parazzini F, Luchini L, La Vecchia C, et al. Video display terminal use during pregnancy and reproductive outcome — a meta analysis. J Epidemiol Community Health 1993; 47: 265–268.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sperling K, Pelz J, Wegner RD, et al. Significant increase in trisomy 21 in Berlin nine months after the Chernobyl reactor accident: Temporal correlation or causal relation? Br Med J 1994; 309: 158–160.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Akar N, Cavdar AO. High incidence of neural tube defects in Bursa, Turkey. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 1988; 2: 89–92.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Caglayan S, Kayhan B, Mentesoglu S, et al. Changing incidence of neural tube defects in Bursa, Turkey. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 1989; 3: 62–65.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Morrey M, Brown J, Williams JA, et al. Preliminary assessment of the radiological impact of the Chernobyl Reactor Accident on the population of the European Community. Luxembourg: Commission of the European Communities, Health and Safety Directorate, 1987: 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  40. EUROCAT Working Group. Preliminary Evaluation of the impact of Chernobyl radiological contamination on the frequency of central nervous system malformations in 18 regions of Europe. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 1988; 2: 253–264.

    Google Scholar 

  41. De Wals P, Bertrand F, De La Mata I, et al. Evaluation of the genetic impact of the Chernobyl accident. Acta Paediatr Lat 1988; 41: 846–854.

    Google Scholar 

  42. De Wals P, Bertrand F, de La Mata I, et al. Chromosomal anomalies and Chernobyl. Int J Epidemiol 1988; 17: 230.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ericson A, Kallen B. Pregnancy outcome in Sweden after the Chernobyl accident. Environ Res 1994; 67: 149–159.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Harjulehto T, Aro T, Rita H, et al. The accident of Chernobyl and outcome of pregnancy in Finland. Br Med J 1989; 288: 995–997.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Lie RT, Irgens LM, Skjaerven R, et al. Birth defects in Norway by levels of external and food based exposure to radiation from Chernobyl. Am J Epidemiol. 1992; 136: 377–388.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Little J. The Chernobyl accident, congenital anomalies and other reproductive outcomes. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 1993; 7: 121–151.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Leck I. Clusters of anophtalmia. Br Med J 1994; 308: 535.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. INSERM Unité 149 and Registre des Malformations Congénitales de Paris, 123, Boulevard de Port-Royal, 75014, Paris, France

    Janine Goujard

Authors
  1. Janine Goujard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goujard, J. Clusters of birth defects: Emergency and management. A review of some publications. Eur J Epidemiol 15, 853–862 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007530216916

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007530216916

Search

Navigation