Abstract
According to Gottfredson and Hirschi's (1990) A General Theory ofCrime, all illegal activity is the manifestation of a single underlyingcause. The authors argue that inadequate child-rearing causes individualsto develop a similar type of propensity for criminal and analogousbehavior. Gottfredson and Hirschi label this characteristic“low self-control.” Six dimensions, which can be identified intheir theory, are suggested to comprise a final low self-controltrait. Further, low self-control is proposed to be an invariantcharacteristic (i.e., its form does not change with the age of theindividual or context in which the person resides). In this research, weevaluate these two propositions. First, the six dimensions are measured andused to determine if a multidimensional model can explain another commonfactor—low self-control—in two samples of individuals (fromdifferent locales) with dissimilar mean ages. Second, low self-control inboth samples is tested for invariance. We test the proposed invariance oflow self-control by examining if the parameter values in a model, which isreflective of Gottfredson and Hirschi's conceptualization of thecharacteristic, differ across the two samples of individuals. The resultssupport both of Gottfredson and Hirschi's propositions. Lowself-control does appear to be a multidimensional characteristic whosedimensions represent another common factor. Low self-control also appears tobe an invariant latent trait that members of these two samplespossess. These tests help to clarify Gottfredson and Hirschi'sconceptualization of low self-control.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Arneklev, B. J., Grasmick, H. G., Tittle, C. R., and Bursik, R. J.,Jr. (1993). Low self-control and imprudent behavior. J. Quant. Criminol. 9: 225–247.
Arneklev, B. J., Cochran, J. K., and Gainey, R. R. (1998). Testing Gottfredson and Hirschi's “low self-control” stability hypothesis: An exploratory study. Am. J. Crim. Just. 23: 107–127.
Barlow, H. D. (1991). Explaining crimes and analogous acts, or the unrestrained will grab at pleasure whenever they can. J. Crim. Law Criminol. 82: 229–242.
Bartusch D. R. J., Lynam, D. R., Moffitt, T. E., and Silva, P. A. (1997). Is age important? Testing a general versus a developmental theory of antisocial behavior. Criminology35: 13–348.
Benson, M. L., and Moore, E. (1992). Are white-collar and common offenders the same? An empirical and theoretical critique of a recently proposed general theory of crime. J. Res. Crime Delinq. 29: 251–272.
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables, John Wiley, New York.
Brownfield, D., and Sorenson, A. M. (1993). Self-control and juvenile delinquency: Theoretical issues and an empirical assessment of selected elements of a general theory of crime. Deviant Behav. 14: 243–264.
Bursik, R. J.,Jr. (1980). The dynamics of specialization in juvenile offenses. Soc. Forces58: 851–864.
Caspi, A., Moffit, T. E., Silva, P. A., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., Krueger, R. F., and Schmutte, P. S. (1994). Are some people crime-prone? Replications of the personality-crime relationship across countries, genders, races, and methods. Criminology32: 163–195.
Cernkovich, S. A., and Giordano, P. C. (1987). Family relationships and delinquency. Criminology25: 295–321.
Evans, T. D., Cullen, F. T., Burton, V. S., Jr., Dunaway, R. G., and Benson, M. L. (1997). The social consequences of self-control: Testing the general theory of crime. Criminology35: 475–501.
Gottfredson, M. R., and Hirschi, T. (1990). A General Theory of Crime, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
Gibbs, J. J., and Geiver, D. (1995). Self-control and its manifestations among university students: An empirical test of Gottfredson and Hirschi's general theory. Just. Q. 12: 231–255.
Grasmick, H. G., Tittle, C. R., Bursik, R. J.,Jr., and Arneklev, B. J. (1993). Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi's general theory of crime. J. Res. Crime Delinq. 30: 5–29.
Hindelang, M. J. (1971). Age, sex, and the versatility of delinquent involvements. Soc. Problems18: 522–535.
Hindelang, M. J., Hirschi, T., and Weis, J. (1981). Measuring Delinquency, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
Hirschi, T. (1983). Crime and the family. In Wilson, J. Q. (ed.), Crime and Public Policy, Institute for Contemporary Studies, San Francisco.
Hirschi, T. (1986). On the compatibility of rational choice and social control theories of crime. In Cornish, D., and Clarke, R. (eds.), The Reasoning Criminal, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Hirschi, T., and Gottfredson, M. (1993). Commentary: Testing the general theory of crime. J. Res. Crime Delinq. 30: 47–54.
Hu, L., and Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In Hoyle, R. H. (ed.), Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Joreskog, K. G., and Sorbom, D. (1979). Advances in Factor Analysis and Structure Equation Models, Abt Books, Cambridge, MA.
Joreskog, K. G., and Sorbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7: User's Reference Guide, Scientific Software, Mooresville, IN.
Joreskog, K. G., and Sorbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: User's Reference Guide, Scientific Software, Chicago.
Keane, C., Maxim, P. S., and Teevan, J. J. (1993). Drinking and driving: Testing a general theory of crime. J. Res. Crime Delinq. 30: 30–46.
Kempf, K. L. (1987). Specialization and the criminal career. Criminology25: 399–420.
Klein, M. (1984). Offense specialization and versatility among juveniles. Br. J. Criminol. 24: 185–194.
Land, K. C. (1992). Models of criminal careers: Some suggestions for moving beyond the current debate. Criminology30: 149–155.
Loeber, R., and Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (1986). Family factors as correlates and predictors of juvenile conduct problems and delinquency. In Tonry, M., and Morris, N. (eds.), Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of Research, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 29–149.
Longshore, D. (1996). Self-control and opportunity as predictors of criminal involvement: Testing the general theory of crime. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Chicago.
Longshore, D. (1997). Self-control and competing criminological constructs as correlates of deviance. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology, San Diego, CA.
Longshore, D., Turner, S., and Stein, J. A. (1996). Self-control in a criminal sample: An examination of construct validity. Criminology34: 209–228.
Longshore, D., Stein, J. A., and Turner, S. (1998). Reliability and validity of a self-control measure: Rejoinder. Criminology36: 175–182.
Marenin, O., and Reisig, M. D. (1995). “A general theory of crime” and patterns of crime in Nigeria: An exploration of methodological assumptions. J. Crim. Just. 23: 501–518.
McCord, J. (1991a). The cycle of crime and socialization practices. J. Crim. Law Criminol. 82: 211–228.
McCord, J. (1991b). Family relationships, juvenile delinquency, and adult criminality. Criminology 29: 397–417.
Nagin, D. S., and Farrington, D. P. (1991). On the relationship of past to future participation in delinquency. Criminology29: 163–189.
Nagin, D. S., and Farrington, D. P. (1992). The stability of criminal potential from childhood to adulthood. Criminology30: 235–260.
Nagin, D. S., and Land, K. C. (1993). Age, criminal careers, and population heterogeneity: Specification and estimation of a nonparametric, mixed Poisson model. Criminology31: 327–362.
Nagin, D. S., and Paternoster, R. (1993). Enduring individual differences and rational choice theories of crime. Law Soc. Rev. 27: 467–496.
Paternoster, R., and Brame, R. (1997). Multiple routes to delinquency? A test of developmental and general theories of crime. Criminology34: 49–85.
Patterson, G. R., and Dishion, T. J. (1985). Contributions of families and peers to delinquency. Criminology23: 63–79.
Piquero, A. R., and Rosay, A. B. (1998). The reliability and validity of Grasmick et al.'s selfcontrol scale: A comment on Longshore et al. Criminology36: 157–173.
Piquero, A. R., and Tibbetts, S. (1996). Specifying the direct and indirect effects of low selfcontrol and situational factors in offenders' decision making: Toward a more complete model of rational offending. Just. Q. 13: 481–510.
Polakowski, M. (1994). Linking self and social control with deviance: Illuminating the structure underlying A General Theory of Crime and its relation to deviant activity. J. Quant. Criminol. 10: 41–78.
Reed, G. E., and Yeager, P. C. (1996). Organizational offending and neoclassical criminology: Challenging the reach of a general theory of crime. Criminology34: 357–377.
Wells, L. E., and Rankin, J. H. (1988). Direct parental controls and delinquency. Criminology26: 263–285.
Wilson, J. Q., and Herrnstein, R. J. (1985). Crime and Human Nature: The Definitive Causes of Crime, Simon and Schuster, New York.
Wood, P. B., Pfefferbaum, B., and Arneklev, B. J. (1993). Risk-taking and self-control: Social psychological correlates of delinquency. J. Crime Just. 16: 111–130.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Arneklev, B.J., Grasmick, H.G. & Bursik, R.J. Evaluating the Dimensionality and Invariance of ”Low Self-Control”. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 15, 307–331 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007528515341
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007528515341