Skip to main content
Log in

The Social Psychology of Groups and Group Psychotherapy: One View of the Next Century

  • Published:
Group

Abstract

Will fields that study groups in general, such as social psychology, and fields that use groups to achieve therapeutic goals, such as group psychotherapy, move toward unification in the future or will they drift apart? One possible future assumes that these two approaches to groups will become better integrated as (a) societal changes increase individuals' reliance on groups; (b) research and theory on group processes become more sophisticated; and (c) basic and applied researchers work together more closely in examining groups. Such unification requires, however, changes in the training, outlook, and procedures used by both practitioners and researchers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Agazarian, Y. M. (1997). Systems-centered therapy for groups. NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, H. S. (1993). Future of group psychotherapy. In H. I. Kaplan & B. J. Sadock (Eds.), Comprehensive group psychotherapy (2nd ed., pp. 724–732). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bednar, R. L., & Kaul, T. (1979). Experiential group research: What never happened. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 15, 311–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, L. G., & Schaller, M. (1998). Methods for the measurement of consensual beliefs within groups. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 2, 241–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, S. E., & Madson, L. (1997). Models of the self: Self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 5–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ettin, M. F. (1996). Do you know where your group is? Development of a group-as-a-whole compass. Part I. Group, 20, 57–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, D. R. (1992). Values, conceptions of science, and the social psychological study of morality. In W. M. Kurtines, M. Azmitia, & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), The role of values in psychology and human development (pp. 239–255). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, D. R. (1993). Building a bridge between basic social psychology and the study of mental health. Contemporary Psychology, 38, 932–933.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, D. R (1998). Methodological advances in the study of group dynamics. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2, 211–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, D. R. (1999). Group dynamics. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, D. R., & Corazzini, J. G. (2000). Groups as change agents. In C. R. Snyder & R. E. Ingham (Eds.), Handbook of psychological change: Psychotherapy processes and practices for the 21st century. (pp. 309–336). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, D. R., & Leary, M. R. (1991). Metatheoretical and epistemological issues. In C. R. Snyder & D. R. Forsyth (Eds.), Handbook of social and clinical psychology: The health perspective (pp. 757–773). New York: Pergamino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, D. R., & Leary, M. R. (1997). Achieving the goals of the scientist-practitioner model: The seven interfaces of social and counseling psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 25, 180–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, D. R., & Strong, S. R. (1986). The scientific study of counseling and psychotherapy: A unificationist view. American Psychologist, 41, 113–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foulkes, S. (1964). Therapeutic group analysis. NY: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, M. A., & Williams, K. D. (2000). From I to we: Social identity and the collective self. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4, 81–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, R. H. (1983). Group treatment approaches. In M. Hersen, A. E., Kazdin, & A. S. Bellack (Eds.), The clinical psychology handbook (pp. 593–610). New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, D. K. (1998). Studying group dynamics with the social relations model. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 2, 230–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marmarosh, C. L., & Corazzini, J. G. (1997). Putting the group in your pocket: Using collective identity to enhance personal and collective self-esteem. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 1, 65–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, J. E. (1997). Small group research, that once and future field: An interpretation of the past with an eye to the future. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1, 7–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, W. J. (1973). The yin and yang of progress in social psychology: Seven koans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 446–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moritz, S. E., & Watson, C. B. (1998). Levels of analysis issues in group psychology: Using efficacy as an example of a multilevel model. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 2, 285–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phinney, J. S. (1996). When we talk about American ethnic groups, what do we mean? American Psychologist, 51, 918–927.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P. (1996). Science as ally of practice. American Psychologist, 51, 1072–1079.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, M. E. (1981). Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavson, S. R. (1950). Group psychotherapy. Scientific American, 183(6), 42–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, C. R., & Forsyth, D. R. (1991). The interface toward the Year 2000. In C. R. Snyder & D. R. Forsyth (Eds.), Handbook of Social and clinical psychology: The health perspective (pp. 788–806). New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, I. D. (1974). Whatever happened to the group in social psychology? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 94–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H. C. (1990). Cross-cultural studies of individualism and collectivism. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1989, 39, 41–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yalom, I. D. (1995). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy (4th ed.). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Forsyth, D.R. The Social Psychology of Groups and Group Psychotherapy: One View of the Next Century. Group 24, 147–155 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007527831138

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007527831138

Navigation