Abstract
Will fields that study groups in general, such as social psychology, and fields that use groups to achieve therapeutic goals, such as group psychotherapy, move toward unification in the future or will they drift apart? One possible future assumes that these two approaches to groups will become better integrated as (a) societal changes increase individuals' reliance on groups; (b) research and theory on group processes become more sophisticated; and (c) basic and applied researchers work together more closely in examining groups. Such unification requires, however, changes in the training, outlook, and procedures used by both practitioners and researchers.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Agazarian, Y. M. (1997). Systems-centered therapy for groups. NY: Guilford Press.
Bernard, H. S. (1993). Future of group psychotherapy. In H. I. Kaplan & B. J. Sadock (Eds.), Comprehensive group psychotherapy (2nd ed., pp. 724–732). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
Bednar, R. L., & Kaul, T. (1979). Experiential group research: What never happened. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 15, 311–319.
Conway, L. G., & Schaller, M. (1998). Methods for the measurement of consensual beliefs within groups. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 2, 241–252.
Cross, S. E., & Madson, L. (1997). Models of the self: Self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 5–37.
Ettin, M. F. (1996). Do you know where your group is? Development of a group-as-a-whole compass. Part I. Group, 20, 57–89.
Forsyth, D. R. (1992). Values, conceptions of science, and the social psychological study of morality. In W. M. Kurtines, M. Azmitia, & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), The role of values in psychology and human development (pp. 239–255). New York: Wiley.
Forsyth, D. R. (1993). Building a bridge between basic social psychology and the study of mental health. Contemporary Psychology, 38, 932–933.
Forsyth, D. R (1998). Methodological advances in the study of group dynamics. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2, 211–212.
Forsyth, D. R. (1999). Group dynamics. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Forsyth, D. R., & Corazzini, J. G. (2000). Groups as change agents. In C. R. Snyder & R. E. Ingham (Eds.), Handbook of psychological change: Psychotherapy processes and practices for the 21st century. (pp. 309–336). New York: Wiley.
Forsyth, D. R., & Leary, M. R. (1991). Metatheoretical and epistemological issues. In C. R. Snyder & D. R. Forsyth (Eds.), Handbook of social and clinical psychology: The health perspective (pp. 757–773). New York: Pergamino.
Forsyth, D. R., & Leary, M. R. (1997). Achieving the goals of the scientist-practitioner model: The seven interfaces of social and counseling psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 25, 180–200.
Forsyth, D. R., & Strong, S. R. (1986). The scientific study of counseling and psychotherapy: A unificationist view. American Psychologist, 41, 113–119.
Foulkes, S. (1964). Therapeutic group analysis. NY: International Universities Press.
Hogg, M. A., & Williams, K. D. (2000). From I to we: Social identity and the collective self. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4, 81–97.
Klein, R. H. (1983). Group treatment approaches. In M. Hersen, A. E., Kazdin, & A. S. Bellack (Eds.), The clinical psychology handbook (pp. 593–610). New York: Pergamon.
Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York: Harper & Row.
Marcus, D. K. (1998). Studying group dynamics with the social relations model. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 2, 230–240.
Marmarosh, C. L., & Corazzini, J. G. (1997). Putting the group in your pocket: Using collective identity to enhance personal and collective self-esteem. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 1, 65–74.
McGrath, J. E. (1997). Small group research, that once and future field: An interpretation of the past with an eye to the future. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1, 7–27.
McGuire, W. J. (1973). The yin and yang of progress in social psychology: Seven koans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 446–456.
Moritz, S. E., & Watson, C. B. (1998). Levels of analysis issues in group psychology: Using efficacy as an example of a multilevel model. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 2, 285–298.
Phinney, J. S. (1996). When we talk about American ethnic groups, what do we mean? American Psychologist, 51, 918–927.
Seligman, M. E. P. (1996). Science as ally of practice. American Psychologist, 51, 1072–1079.
Shaw, M. E. (1981). Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Slavson, S. R. (1950). Group psychotherapy. Scientific American, 183(6), 42–45.
Snyder, C. R., & Forsyth, D. R. (1991). The interface toward the Year 2000. In C. R. Snyder & D. R. Forsyth (Eds.), Handbook of Social and clinical psychology: The health perspective (pp. 788–806). New York: Pergamon.
Steiner, I. D. (1974). Whatever happened to the group in social psychology? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 94–108.
Triandis, H. C. (1990). Cross-cultural studies of individualism and collectivism. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1989, 39, 41–133.
Yalom, I. D. (1995). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy (4th ed.). New York: Basic Books.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Forsyth, D.R. The Social Psychology of Groups and Group Psychotherapy: One View of the Next Century. Group 24, 147–155 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007527831138
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007527831138