Skip to main content
Log in

Different induction of adaptive response to ionizing radiation in normal and neoplastic cells

  • Published:
Cell Biology and Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since the beneficial effects of low-dose radiation (0.01 Gy) are usually observed in normal cells, we investigated whether the adaptive response was induced by low-dose radiation in neoplastic cells of different origin as well as in normal cells. Cell lines used in this experiment were as follows: mouse lymphocytes (NL); L929 cells established from mouse connective tissue; primary mouse keratinocytes (PK); line 308 from mouse papilloma; X-ray sensitive lymphoma cells, L5178Y-S and EL-4 cells from mouse lymphoma. The adaptive response was determined by cell survival and apoptosis. The involvement of apoptosis in the adaptive response was examined by ELISA and TUNEL assay. Adaptive response was induced by pretreatment with low-dose radiation of 0.01 Gy in normal cells such as NL, L929, and PK, but not in L5178Y-S, EL-4, and line 308 cells. In addition, the reduction of apoptosis by pretreatment with low-dose radiation was observed in NL, L929, and PK, but not in L5178Y-S, EL-4, and line 308 cells. These results suggested that the adaptive response could be induced by pretreatment with low-dose radiation and the phenomena were observed in normal cells, not in neoplastic cells. In addition, pretreatment with low-dose radiation reduced apoptosis, suggesting that an anti-apoptotic pathway may be involved in the adaptive response.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abend M, Rhein A, Gilbertz KP, Blakely WF, van Beuingen D. Correlation of micronucleus and apoptosis assays with reproductive cell death. Int J Radiat Biol. 1995;3:315–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Afanas'ev VN, Korl' BA, Mantsygin YA, Nelipovich PA, Pechatnikov VA, Umaksky SR. Flow cytometry and biochemical analysis of DNA degradation characteristic of two types of cell death. FEBS Lett. 1986;194:347–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Azzam EI, Raaphors GP, Mitchel REJ. Radiation induced adaptive response for protection against micronucleus formation and neoplastic transformation in C3H 10T/1/2 mouse embryo cells. Radiat Res. 1994;138:S28–31.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bosi A, Olivieri G. Variability of the adaptive response to ionizing radiation in humans. Mutat Res. 1989;211:13–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boothman DA, Meyers M, Odegaard E, Wang M. Altered G1 checkpoint control determines adaptive survival responses to ionizing radiation. Mutat Res. 1996;358:143–53.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cai L, Liu SZ. Induction of cytogenetic adaptive response of somatic and germ cells in vivo and in vitro by low-dose X-irradiation. Int J Radiat Biol. 1985;58:187–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan S, Vijayalaxmi G, Mindek G, Burkart W. Adaptive response to 2 low doses of X-rays in human blood lymphocytes. Mutat Res. 1990;243:53–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Farooqi Z, Kesavan PC. Low dose radiation-induced adaptive response in bone marrow cells of mice. Mutat Res. 1993;302:83–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hennings H, Michael D, Cheng C, Steinert P, Holbrook K, Yuspa SH. Calcium regulation of growth and differentiation of mouse epidermal cells in culture. Cell. 1980;19:245–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hyun SJ, Yoon MY, Kim TH, Kim JH. Enhancement of mitogen-stimulated proliferation of low dose radiation-adapted mouse splenocytes. Anticancer Res. 1997;17:225–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ishii K, Watanabe M. Participation of gap-junctional cell communication on the adaptive response in human cells induced by low dose of X-rays. Int J Radiat Biol. 1996;69:291–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ljungman M. The influence of chromatin structure on the frequency of radiation-induced DNA breaks: a study using nuclear and nucleoid monolayers. Radiat Res. 1991;128:58–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noma A, Tsuboi N. Dependence of junctional conductance on proton, calcium and magnesium ions in cardiac paired cells of guinea-pig. J Physiol. 1997;382:193–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olivieri G, Bodycote J, Wolff S. Adaptive response of human lymphocytes to low concentrations of radioactive thymidine. Science. 1984;223:594–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Radford IR. Mouse lymphoma cells that undergo interphase death show markedly increased sensitivity to radiation-induced DNA double strand breakage as compared with cells that undergo mitotic death. Int J Radiat Biol. 1991;59:1353–69.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Samson L, Schwartz JL. Evidence for an adaptive DNA repair pathway in CHO and human skin fibroblast cell lines. Nature. 1980;287:861–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seong JS, Suh CO, Kim GE. Adaptive response to ionizing radiation induced by low doses of gamma rays in human cell lines. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;33:869–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shadley JD, Wolff S. Very low doses of X-ray can cause human lymphocytes to become less susceptible to ionizing radiation. Radiat Res. 1987;111:511–17.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens LC, Ang KK, Schultheiss TE, Milas L, Meyn RE. Apoptosis in irradiated murine tumors. Radiat Res. 1989;120:140–53.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Strickland JE, Greenhalgh DA, Koceva-Chyla A et al. Development of murine epidermal cell lines which contain an activated rasHa oncogene and form papillomas in skin grafts on athymic nude mouse hosts. Cancer Res. 1988;48:165–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Szekely JG, Lobreau AU. High radiosensitivity of MOLT-4 leukaemic cell line. Int J Radiat Biol. 1985;48:277–84.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trosko JE. Possible role of intercellular communication in the modulation of the biological response to radiation. Yokojama Med Bull. 1991;42:151–65.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vijayalaxmi G, Burkart W. Resistance and cross-resistance to chromosome damage in human blood lymphocytes adapted to bleomycine. Mutat Res. 1989;211:1–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff S. Low dose exposure and the induction of adaptation. In: Sugahara T, Sagan LA, Aoyama T, eds. Low dose irradiation and biological defense mechanisms. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science; 1992:21–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff S, Afzal V, Wiencke JK, Olivieri G, Michaeli A. Human lymphocytes exposed to low doses of ionizing radiation become refractory to high doses of radiation as well as to chemical mutagens that induce double strand breaks in DNA. Int J Radiat Biol. 1988;53:39–49.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff S, Wiencke JK, Afzal V, Youngblom J, Cortes F. The adaptive response of human lymphocytes to very low doses of ionizing radiation: a case of induced chromosomal repair with the induction of specific proteins. In: Baverstok KM, Stather JW, eds. Low dose radiation: biological bases of risk assessment. London: Taylor & Francis; 1989:446–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyllie AH, Kerr JFR, Currie AR. Cell death: the significance of apoptosis. Int Rev Cytol. 1980;68:251–306.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zou PK, Liu SY, Sun WZ, Zhang YP, Wei K. Cultured mouse SR-1 cells exposed to low dose of gamma-rays become less susceptible to the induction of mutagenesis by radiation as well as bleomycin. Mutagenesis. 1993;8:109–11.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Park, S., Lee, Y., Jeong, K. et al. Different induction of adaptive response to ionizing radiation in normal and neoplastic cells. Cell Biol Toxicol 15, 111–119 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007525531145

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007525531145

Navigation