Skip to main content
Log in

Developing an Empirically Based Typology of Delinquent Youths

  • Published:
Journal of Quantitative Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A number of personality-based typologies have been developed to differentiatejuvenile delinquents. Some of these typologies have been faulted for theirmethod of construction, for their failure to provide outcome measures, orbecause they are dated and have not been retested with more recent delinquentpopulations. This paper describes efforts to develop an empirically derived,inductive typology of juvenile delinquents that can be used in appliedsettings to facilitate a better understanding of program outcomes and enableplacement authorities better to predict program effectiveness. The dataemployed in the analysis come from an outcome-based informationsystem—ProDES—that has been operational for more than4 years in Philadelphia. Unlike many such databases, ProDES was jointlydesigned by researchers and practitioners to serve a large system ofcommunity and institutional programs. Included among the outcome measuresare four standardized, self-reported personality scales that comprise 14subscales and form the basis of the typology. This paper describes themethods used to construct the typology, the substance of the classificationsystem, and its potential utility for program evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Aldenderfer, M. S., and Blashfield, R. K. (1984). Cluster Analysis, Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, No. 44, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, D. A., and Bonta, J. (1994). The Psychology of Criminal Conduct, Anderson, Cincinnati, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, D. A., Zinger, I., Hoge, R. D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., and Cullen, F. T. (1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology28(3): 369–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, S. C. (1986). Classifying juveniles—An important management tool. In Dziobek, L. et al. (eds.), Issues in Juvenile Delinquency, American Correctional Association, Laurel, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonta, J. (1996). Risk-needs assessment and treatment. In Harland, A. (ed.), Choosing Correctional Options That Work: Defining the Demand and Evaluating the Supply,Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brannon, J.,et al. (1989). Applied behavioral typologies: Implications for the residential treatment and community re-integration of juvenile offenders.J. Offender Counsel. Serv. Rehab. 14(3): 77–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, T. (1987). Classification: An overview of selected methodological issues. In Gottfredson, D. M., and Tonry, M. (eds.), Prediction and Classification: Criminal Justice Decision Making, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 201–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brill, R. (1978). Implications of the conceptual level matching model for the treatment of delinquents. J. Res. Crime Delinq. 15(3): 229–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cernkovich, S. A., and Giordano, P. C. (1992). School bonding, race and delinquency. Criminology30: 261–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, C. B. (1996). Offender classification: Two decades of progress. Crim. Just. Behav. 23(1): 121–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloward, R. A., and Ohlin, L. E. (1960). Delinquency and Opportunity: A Theory of Delinquent Gangs, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dembo, R. et al. (1984). Development and assessment of a classification of high risk youths. J. Drug Issues24(1, 2): 25–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everitt, B. S. (1993). Cluster Analysis, Edward Arnold, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giordano, P. C., and Cernkovich, S. A. (1987). Family relationships and delinquency. Criminology25: 295–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, D. (1987). Classification for risk. In Gottfredson, D. M., and Tonry, M. (eds.), Prediction and Classification: Criminal Justice Decision Making, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 249–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goring, C. (1913). The English Convict, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, D. M. (1987). Prediction and classification in criminal justice decision making. In Gottfredson, D. M., and Tonry, M. (eds.), Prediction and Classification: Criminal Justice Decision Making,University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, S. D. (1987). Prediction: An overview of selected methodological issues. In Gottfredson, D. M., and Tonry, M, (eds.), Prediction and Classification: Criminal Justice Decision Making, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 21–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P. W. (1988). The Interpersonal Maturity Classification System: I-level. Crim. Just. Behav. 15(1): 59–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P. W., and Jones, P. R. (1999). Differentiating delinquent youths for program planning and evaluation. Crim. Just. Behav. (in press).

  • Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of Delinquency, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huizinga, D., Esbensen, F., and Weiher, A. W. (1991). Are there multiple paths to delinquency? J. Crim. Law Criminol. 82(1): 83–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, T. W., and Johnson, J. H. (1991). Relationship of hyperactivity and sensation seeking to delinquent subtypes. Crim. Just. Behav. 18(2): 195–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, W., Kilkenny, W., and Kohlberg, L. (1983). Moral development theory and practice. In Laufer, W., and Day, J. (eds.), Personality Theory, Moral Development and Criminal Behavior, D. C. Heath, Lexington, pp. 281–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jesness, C. F. (1983). The Jesness Inventory: Manual,Multi-Health Systems, North Tonawanda, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P. R. (1996). Risk prediction in criminal justice. In Harland, A. (ed.), Choosing Correctional Options that Work: Defining the Demand and Evaluating the Supply,Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P. R., and Harris, P. W. (1997). ProDES, an Assessment of the Self Reported Scales. Monograph, Crime and Justice Research Institute, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, D. L., Posey, C. D., and Rapaport, K. R. (1988). A theoretical revolution in corrections: Varied purposes for classification. Crim. Just. Behav. 15(1): 125–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Megargee, E. I., and Bohn, M. J., Jr., with Myer, J., and Sink, F. (1979). Classifying Criminal Offenders, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezzich, A. C., Coffman, G., and Mezzich, J. E. (1991). Typology of violent delinquent adolescents. J. Psychiatry Law92(2): 63–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W. (1958). Lower-class culture as a generating milieu of gang delinquency. J. Soc. Issues42(1): 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, T. (1984). Treatment and the role of classification: A review of basics. Crime Delinq. 30(2): 245–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, T. (1992). The Re-Emergence of Correctional Intervention, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quay, H. C. (1979). Classification. In Quay, H. C., and Werry, J. S. (eds.), Psychological Disorders of Childhood, 2nd ed., John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. P., and Shaver, P. R. (1973). Measures of Social Psychological Attitude, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the Adolescent Self-Image, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sechrest, L. (1987). Classification for treatment. In Gottfredson, D. M., and Tonry, M. (eds.), Prediction and Classification: Criminal Justice Decision Making,University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 293–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simourd, D. J., Hoge, R. D., Andrews, D. A., and Leschied, A. W. (1994). An empiricallybased typology of young offenders. Can. J. Criminol. 36(4): 447–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. F. (1989). Evaluability Assessment: A Practical Approach, Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Voorhis, P. (1994). Psychological Classification of the Adult Male Prison Inmate, State University of New York Press, Albany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Voorhis, P. (1997). An overview of offender classification systems. In Van Voorhis, P., Braswell, M., and Lester, D. (eds.), Correctional Counseling and Rehabilitation, 3rd ed., Anderson, Cincinnati, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, M. Q. (1965). Implications of a typology of delinquents for measures of behavior change: A plea for complexity. Youth Auth. Q. 18(3): 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, M. Q. (1971). Classification of offenders as an aid to efficient management and effective treatment. J. Crim. Law Criminol. Police Sci. 62(2): 239–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, M. Q. (1976). Applications of interpersonal theory to offender populations. In Rosenheim, M. (ed.), Pursuing Justice for the Child, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, M. Q., and Hindelang, M. J. (1979). Differential explanation of offender behavior. In Toch, H. (ed.), Psychology of Crime and Criminal Justice, Waveland Press, Prospect Heights, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wholey, J. S. (1994). Assessing the feasibility and likely usefulness of evaluation. In Wholey, J. S., Hatry, H. P., and Newcomer, K. E. (eds.), Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, L. T., and MacNaughton-Smith, P. (1964). New prediction and classification methods in criminology. J. Res. Crime Delinq. 1: 19–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zager, L. D. (1979). The MMPI-based criminal classification system. Crim. Just. Behav. 15(1): 39–57.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jones, P.R., Harris, P.W. Developing an Empirically Based Typology of Delinquent Youths. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 15, 251–276 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007524414432

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007524414432

Navigation