Abstract
One of the major objectives at the end of this century is the development of "alternative" tests for the evaluation of the pharmacological and/or toxicological activity of newly developed molecules. Contact allergy is no exception to the rule and many research programs have been started to develop in vitro techniques for the detection of allergizing compounds. In parallel with these biological studies, another approach is becoming important and will no doubt become more so, namely, the study of structure–activity relationships (SARs). This consists of using molecular or physicochemical properties to predict and, in certain cases, quantify the allergizing potential of a new molecule without using any biological test. Three main approaches are currently under study: the creation of allergy databases, the design of "expert" computerized systems, and the development of quantitative SARs. These three often complementary approaches are still at the development stage, but we can begin to see their potential and limitations. The aim of this article is not to give an exhaustive description of all the systems developed worldwide, but to illustrate each approach by giving some important examples.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barbier A, Rizova E, Stampf J-L et al. Development of a predictive in vitro test for detection of sensitizing compounds (European BRIDGE project). In: Rougier A, Goldberg AM, Maibach HI, eds. In vitro skin toxicology (irritation, phototoxicity, sensitization). New York: Liebert; 1994:341-50.
Barratt MD, Basketter DA, Chamberlain M, Admans GD, Langowski JJ. An expert system rulebase for identifying contact allergens. Toxicol in Vitro. 1994;8:1053-60.
Benezra C, Sigman CC, Perry IR, Helmes T C, Maibach HI. A systematic search for structure-activity relationships of skin contact sensitizers. J Invest Dermatol. 1985;85:351-6.
Bertrand F, Basketter DA, Roberts DW, Lepoittevin J-P. Skin sensitization to eugenol and isoeugenol in mice: possible metabolic pathways involving ortho-quinone and quinone methide intermediates. Chem Res Toxicol. 1997;10:335-43.
Dooms-Goossens A, Dooms M, Drieghe J. Computers and patients' information systems. In: Rycroft RJG, Menne T, Frosch PJ, Benezra C, eds. Textbook of contact dermatitis. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1992:771-84.
Fraginals R, Roberts DW, Lepoittevin J-P, Benezra C. Refinement of the relative alkylation index (RAI) model for skin sensitization and application to mouse and guinea-pig test data for alkylsulfonates. Arch Dermatol Res. 1991;283:387-94.
Franot C, Benezra C, Lepoittevin J-P. Synthesis and interaction studies of 13C labeled lactone derivatives with a model protein using 13C NMR. Bioorg Med Chem. 1993;1:389-97.
Franot C, Roberts DW, Smith RG, Basketter DA, Benezra C, Lepoittevin J-P. Structure-activity relationships for contact allergenic potential of γ,γ-dimethyl-γ-butyrolactone derivatives Part I. Chem Res Toxicol. 1994a;7:297-306.
Franot C, Roberts DW, Basketter DA, Benezra C, Lepoittevin J-P. Structure-activity relationships for contact allergenic potential of γ,γ-dimethyl-γ-butyrolactone derivatives Part II. Chem Res Toxicol. 1994b;7:307-12.
Kalish RS. Antigen processing: the gateway to the immune response. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1995;32:640-52.
Lepoittevin J-P, Benezra C. 13C-Enriched methylalkane-sulfonates: new lipophilic methylating agents for the identification of nucleophilic amino acids of protein by NMR. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992;33:3875-8.
Lepoittevin J-P, Basketter DA, Goossens A, Kalberg A-T (eds). Allergic contact dermatitis: the molecular basis. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1997.
Murray JS. How the MHC selects Th1/Th2 immunity. Immunol Today. 1998;19:157-63.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lepoittevin, JP. Development of structure–activity relationships (SARs) in allergic contact dermatitis. Cell Biol Toxicol 15, 47–55 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007502723275
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007502723275