Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Secular trends in the osteoporotic fractures of the distal humerus

  • Published:
European Journal of Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Osteoporosis, with its sequelae of fracture, is a major, continuously increasing threat to the health of the elderly, and therefore reliable epidemiological information is needed for assessment of the fracture development in the future and for effective fracture prevention. However, very little population-based information is available concerning the nationwide numbers, incidences and especially secular trends of osteoporotic fractures other than those occurring at the hip. We determined the current trends in the number and incidence of osteoporotic fractures of the distal humerus in Finnish women in 1970–1995 by collecting from the National Hospital Discharge Register all female patients aged 60 years or more who were admitted to our hospitals in 1970–1972, 1974–1975, 1978–1980, 1983–1985 and 1988–1995 for primary treatment of first osteoporotic fracture of the distal humerus. The fracture was defined as osteoporotic if it occurred on individuals aged 60 years or more as a consequence of a moderate or minimal trauma only (a fall from standing height or less). We also predicted the fracture development till the year 2030 by a regression model, a model that took into account the predicted changes in the fracture incidences and population at risk. The number and incidence (per 100,000 women) of osteoporotic fractures of the distal humerus in Finnish women aged 60 years or more increased from 42 (number) and 11 (incidence) in 1970 to 175 and 30 in 1995. The age-adjusted incidence of osteoporotic fractures of the distal humerus also increased, from 12/100,000 women in 1970 to 28/100,000 women in 1995. If this trend continues, the number of these fractures in Finnish women will be almost three-fold in the year 2030 compared with that in 1995. We conclude that the number of osteoporotic fractures of the distal humerus in elderly Finnish women is increasing more rapidly than can be accounted for by the demographic changes alone and therefore effective preventive measures are imperative to keep this problem in control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Consensus Development Conference: Diagnosis, prophylaxis and treatment of osteoporosis. Am J Med 1993; 94: 646–650.

    Google Scholar 

  2. World Health Organisation: Assesment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Technical Report Series 1994. WHO, Geneva.

  3. Jones G, Nguyen T, Sambrook PN, Kelly PJ, Gilbert C, Eisman JA. Symptomatic fracture incidence in elderly men and women: The Dubbo osteoporosis epidemiologic study (DOES). Osteoporosis Int 1994; 4: 277–282.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Melton LJ III. Epidemiology of fractures. In: Riggs BL, Melton LJ III (eds), Osteoporosis: Etiology, diagnosis and management. New York: Raven Press, 1988: 133–154.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cummings SR, Kelsey JL, Nevitt MC, O'Dowd KJ. Epidemiology of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures. Epidemiol Rev 1985; 7: 178–208.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bauer GCH. Epidemiology of fractures in aged persons. Clin Orthop 1960; 17: 219–225.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Alffram PA. An epidemiologic study of cervical and trochanteric fractures of the femur in an urban population. Acta Orthop Scand 1964; suppl. 65.

  8. Jensen JS. Incidence of hip fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 1980; 51: 511–513.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lüthje P. Incidence of hip fractures in Finland. A forecast for 1990. Acta Orthop Scand 1985; 56: 223–225.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kannus P, Parkkari J, Niemi S. Age-adjusted incidence of hip fractures. Lancet 1995; 346: 50–51.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Melton LJ III, Kan SH, Frye MA, Wahner HW, OFallon WM, Riggs BL. Epidemiology of vertebral fractures in women. Am J Epidemiol 1989; 129: 1000–1011.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cummings SR, Black DM, Rubin SM. Lifetime risks of hip, Colles' or vertebral fracture, and coronary heart disease among white postmenopausal women. Arch Intern Med 1989; 149: 2445–2448.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cooper C, Atkinson EJ, O'Fallon WM, Melton LJ. Incidence of clinically diagnosed vertebral fractures: A population-based study in Rochester, Minnesota, 1985– 1989. J Bone Miner Res 1992; 7: 221–227.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Falch JA. Epidemiology of fractures of the distal forearm in Oslo, Norway. Acta Orthop Scand 1983; 54: 291–295.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Solgaard S, Petersen VS. Epidemiology of distal radius fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 1985; 56: 391–393.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lauritzen JB, Schwarz P, Lund B, McNair P, Transbøl I. Changing incidence and residual lifetime risk of common osteoporosis-related fractures. Osteoporosis Int 1993; 3: 127–132.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Horak J, Nilsson BE. Epidemiology of fracture of the upper end of the humerus. Clin Orthop 1975; 112: 250–253.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rose SH, Melton LJ, Morrey BF, Ilstrup DM, Riggs BL. Epidemiologic features of humeral fractures. Clin Orthop 1982; 168: 24–30.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bengnér U, Johnell O, Redlund-Johnell I. Changes in the incidence of fracture of the upper end of the humerus during a 30-year period. Clin Orthop 1988; 231: 179–182.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Buhr AJ, Cooke AM. Fracture patterns. Lancet 1959; 1: 531–536.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Knowelden J, Buhr AJ, Dunbar O. Incidence of fractures in persons over 35 years of age. A report to the M.R.C. Working Party on fractures in the elderly. Br J Prev Soc Med 1964; 18: 130–141.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Garraway WM, Stauffer RN, Kurland LT, OFallon WM. Limb fractures in a defined population: I. Frequency and distribution. Mayo Clin Proc 1979; 54: 701–707.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Yardley MH. Upper limb fractures: Contrasting patterns in Transkei and England. Injury 1984; 15: 322–323.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Donaldson LJ, Cook A, Thomson RG. Incidence of fractures in a geographically defined population. J Epidemiol Community Health 1990; 44: 241–245.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Aro S, Koskinen R, Keskimäki I. Sairaalastapoisto-rekisterin diagnoosi-, toimenpide-ja tapaturmatietojen luotettavuus. Duodecim 1990; 106: 1443–1450. (in Finnish).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lüthje P, Nurmi I, Kataja M, Heliövaara M, Santavirta S. Incidence of pelvic fractures in Finland in 1988. Acta Orthop Scand 1995; 66: 245–248.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Salmela R, Koistinen V. Yleissairaaloiden poisto-ilmoitusrekisterien kattavuus ja luotettavuus. Sairaala 1987; 49: 480–482. (in Finnish).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Official Statistics of Finland. Structure of population and vital statistics: Whole country and provinces. Helsinki: State Presscenter, 1970–1993.

  29. Official Statistics of Finland. Population projections 1993–2030. Helsinki: State Presscenter, 1993.

  30. Muscat Baron Y, Brincat M, Galea R, Muscat Baron A. The epidemiology of osteoporotic fractures in a Mediterranean country. Calcif Tissue Int 1994; 54: 365–369.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Nevitt MC. Epidemiology of osteoporosis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 1994; 20: 535–559.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Parkkari J, Kannus P, Niemi S, Pasanen M, Järvinen M, Lüthje P, Vuori I. Increasing age-adjusted incidence of hip fractures in Finland. Calcif Tissue Int 1994; 55: 342–345.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kannus P, Palvanen M, Niemi S, Parkkari J, Järvinen M, Vuori I. Increasing number and incidence of osteoporotic fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly people. Brit Med J 1996; 313: 1051–1052.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Accident & Trauma Research Center, UKK Institute for Health Promotion Research, Tampere, Finland

    M. Palvanen, P. Kannus, S. Niemi & J. Parkkari

Authors
  1. M. Palvanen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. P. Kannus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. Niemi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. Parkkari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Palvanen, M., Kannus, P., Niemi, S. et al. Secular trends in the osteoporotic fractures of the distal humerus. Eur J Epidemiol 14, 159–164 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007496318884

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007496318884

Search

Navigation