Effect of supplementation with chromium picolinate on antibody titers to 5-hydroxymethyl uracil
- 58 Downloads
Recent in vitro studies have shown that chromium (III) compounds such as chromium picolinate, a popular dietary supplement among people trying to lose weight, produce chromosome damage. We monitored levels of DNA damage in a chromium picolinate supplement trial by measuring antibodies titers to an oxidized DNA base, 5-hydroxymethyl-2'-deoxyuridine (HMdU), by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Ten obese volunteer women completed a 8-week course of 400 μg chromium picolinate per day. In either absolute titers or percent of the baseline value, there were no changes in antibody titers at 4 or 8 weeks. The titers were very stable within individuals and those of one individual rarely crossed over others, which was reflected in an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.99 (95% confidence interval: 0.96–1.00). There were no effects on glucose and lipid metabolism in this period. The results of this trial suggest that chromium (III) picolinate in a dose typically used for nutrient supplementation dose not increase oxidative DNA damage, as measured by anti-HMdU antibody levels.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Evans CW. Dietary supplementation with essential met al picolinates. Chem Abstr 1091; 95: 23384d.Google Scholar
- 3.IARC. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Vol 49: Chromium. Nickel and Welding. Lyon: IARC, 1990.Google Scholar
- 6.Snow WT. A possible role of chromium (III) in genotoxicity. Env Health Perspect 1991; 92: 75–81.Google Scholar
- 13.Liu S, Dixon K. Induction of mutagenic DNA damage by chromium (VI) and glutathione. Environ Molec Mutagen 1996; 28: 71–79.Google Scholar
- 16.Snow ET. Effects of chromium on DNA replication in vitro. Environmental Health Perspect 1994; 102(suppl 3): 41–44.Google Scholar
- 17.Connett PH, Wetterhahn KE. Metabolism of the carcinogen chromate by cellular constitutes. Struct Bonding 1983; 54: 93–124.Google Scholar
- 18.De Flora S, Wetterhahn KE. Mechanisms of chromium metabolism and genotoxicity. Life Chem Rep 1989; 7: 169–244.Google Scholar
- 22.Ozawa T, Hanaki A. Spin-trapping studies on the reactions of Cr(III) with hydrogen peroxide in the presence of biological reductants: Is Cr(III) non toxic? Biochenm Int 1990; 22: 343–352.Google Scholar
- 29.Frenkel K, Karkoszka J, Cohen B, Baranski B, Jakubowski M, Cosma G, Taioli E, Toniolo P. Occupational exposures to Cd, Ni, and Cr modulate titers of antioxidized DNA base autoantibodies. Env Health Perspect 1994; 102(Suppl): 221–225.Google Scholar
- 34.Erlanger BF, Beiser SM. Antibodies specific for ribonucleosides and ribonucleotides and their reaction with DNA. Proc Natl Acd Sci 1964; 52: 68–74.Google Scholar
- 35.Fleiss J. The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments. New York: Wiley, 1986.Google Scholar
- 44.Wang MM, Fox EA, Stoccker BJ, Menendez CE, Chan SB. Serum cholesterol of adults supplemented with brewer's yeast or chromium chloride. Nutr Res 1989; 9: 989–998.Google Scholar