Advertisement

Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 54, Issue 1, pp 67–76 | Cite as

Biological reasons for the unsuitability of growth parameters and indices for comparing fish growth

  • Mladen T. Živkov
  • Teodora A. Trichkova
  • Galerida N. Raikova-Petrova
Article

Abstract

Parameters k and L∞ in the Von Bertalanffy equation and their derivatives ω=kL∞, φ = logk + 2logL∞; as well as slopes bL/t of the regression L=atb (t, years), relative increments (CI=[L2–L1]/L1), specific growth rates (Cv=InL2–InL1), growth characteristics (Clh = CvxL1) and growth constants (Clt=Cvx[t2 + t1]/2) were analyzed. A total of 121 bream Abramis brama stocks in the first 10 years of life were studied. At the same real growth rate (the average absolute linear annual increments, mm year–1) the values of k, L∞, ω, φ, bL/t, CI, Cv and Clt in different stocks vary within almost the whole range. The main reason is the natural process of growth self-regulation: the relation between the average body lengths in the first year (L1) and the relative growth rates (slopes bL/t) is negative (bL/t = exp[0.1183–0.0053L1], r=0.76). The above relation defines 4 principal types of the Ford-Walford lines. Thirty four percent of the stocks have rather steep slopes of the lines and even parallel the absolute slope of 45°, so the L∞ values of these stocks have no biological significance. The authors recommend a simple and more precise, from a biological point of view, approach for comparing fish population growth rates.

Abramis brama Von Bertalanffy model Ford-Walford equation growth self-regulation growth compensation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References cited

  1. Allen, K.P. 1966. A method of fitting growth curves of the Von Bartalanffy type to observed data. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 23: 163–179.Google Scholar
  2. Backiel, T. & J. Zawisza. 1968. Synopsis of biological data on the bream, Abramis brama (Linnaeus, 1758). FAO Fisheries Synopsis 36, Rome. 143 pp.Google Scholar
  3. Balon, E.K. 1963. Alterstruktur der Populationen und Wachstumsgesetzm:assigkeiten der Donaubrachsen. Sbornik Vysokeskoly chemicko-technologickev Praze, Technologie vody 7: 496–497.Google Scholar
  4. Balon, E.K. 1964. On relative indexes for comparison of growth of fishes. Vest.Cs. Spolec. Zool. 28: 369–379.Google Scholar
  5. Bandura, V.I. & V.A. Guselnikov. 1984. Growth of bream and roach in the Gorkovskoe reservoir. Sbornik Nauchnikh Trudov Gosudarstvenogo Nachno-Issledovatelskogo Instituta Ozernogo i Rechnogo Rybnogo Khozyaistva 210: 93–98 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  6. Barus, V. & O. Oliva. 1995. Fauna CR a SR. Mihulovci Petromyzontes a ryby Osteichthyes (Fauna of the CR and SR. Lampreys Petromyzontes and Fishes Osteichthyes). Academia, Prague. 698 pp. (in Czech).Google Scholar
  7. Belyaev, V.N. 1991. On the relativity of animal size and age. Ekologiya 4: 61–67 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  8. Berdichevsky, L.S. 1964. Biological basis of rational utilization of fish stocks. VINITI, Moskow. 95 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  9. Bernard, D.R. 1981. Multivariate analysis as a means of comparing growth in fish. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 38: 233–236.Google Scholar
  10. Bertalanffy, L. von. 1938. A quantitative theory of organic growth. Human Biology 10: 181–213.Google Scholar
  11. Beverton, R.J.H. 1963. Maturation growth and mortality of clupeid and engraulid stocks in relation to fishing. Con. Per. l'Explor. Mer. Rap. 154: 44–67.Google Scholar
  12. Brylinska, M. & E. Brylinski. 1968. Leszcz (bream). Panstwowe wydawnictwo rolnicze i lesne, Warszawa. 223 pp. (in Polish).Google Scholar
  13. Cerrato, R.M. 1990. Interpretable statistical tests for growth comparisons using parameters in the Von Bertalanffy equation. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 47: 1416–1426.Google Scholar
  14. Dyachuk, I.E. 1974. On the indices of fish growth rate. Gidrobiologischeskii zhurnal 2: 105–110 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  15. Gallucci, V.F. & T.J. Quinn II. 1979. Reparameterizing, fitting and testing a simple growth model. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 108: 14–25.Google Scholar
  16. Gulland, J.A. 1983. Fish stock assessment, a manual of basic methods. FAO/Series on Agriculture 1, J. Wiley & Sons, London. 151 pp.Google Scholar
  17. Hartvich, P. & J. Kubecka. 1989. Hodnoceni r0ustu ryb metodou relativnich prir0ustkovych rozdil0u (Evaluation of fish growth by the method of increment differences). Zivocisna vyroba 34: 917–924.Google Scholar
  18. Hohendorf, K. 1966. Eine Diskussion der Bertalanffy-Funktionen und ihre Anwendung zur Charakterisierung des Wachstums von Fischen. Kieler Meereforschung 22: 70–97.Google Scholar
  19. Hohendorf, K. 1970. Vergleich der Wachstumspotenz in Wildpopulationen mariner Nutzfische. Vortr:age der Ungarischen Biometrischen Konferenz 2: 479–487, Budapest, 1968.Google Scholar
  20. Hopkins, K. 1991. Index of length growth performance is not suited to compare growth in pond experiments. p. 6. Addendum in: D. Paully 1991, Growth Performance in Fishes: Rigorous Description of Patients as a Basis for Understanding Causal Mechanisms, Aquabyte 4(3): 3–6.Google Scholar
  21. Kimura, D.K. 1980. Likelihood methods for the Von Bertalanffy growth curve. U.S. Fish. Bull. 77: 765–776.Google Scholar
  22. Kingsley, M.C.S. 1980. Comments. Von Bertalanffy growth parameters. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 109: 252–253.Google Scholar
  23. Knight, W. 1968. Asymptomatic growth: an example of nonsense disguised as mathematics. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 25: 1303–1307.Google Scholar
  24. Krueger, F. 1969. Das asymptotische Wachstum der Fische-ein Nonsens? Helgolaender wiss. Meeres-untersuch. 19: 205–215.Google Scholar
  25. Merona, B. de 1983. Mod`ele d'estimation rapide de la croissance des poissons: applications aux poissons d'eau d'Afrique. Rev. d'Hydrobiol. Tropicale 16: 103–113.Google Scholar
  26. Mina, M.V. 1973. Growth of fish (methods for investigations in natural populations). pp. 68–115. In: Vertebrate Zoology, Growth of Animals 4, Itogi nauki i tekhniki, Moscow (in Russian).Google Scholar
  27. Misra, R.K. 1980. Statistical comparisons of several growth curves of the Von Bertalanffy type. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 37: 920–926.Google Scholar
  28. Misra, R.K. 1986. Fitting and comparing several growth curves of the generalized Von Bertalanffy type. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci 53: 1656–1659.Google Scholar
  29. Moreau, J., A. Belaud, F. Dauba & A. Nelva. 1985. A method for rapid growth evaluation in fishes: the case of French cyprinid fishes. Hydrobiologia 120: 225–227.Google Scholar
  30. Moreau, J., C. Bambino & D. Pauly. 1986. Indices of overall growth performance of 100 tilapia (Cichlidae) populations. pp. 201–206. In: J.L. Maclean, L.B. Dizon & L.V. Hosillos (ed.) The First Asian Fisheries Forum, Asian Fish. Soc., Manila.Google Scholar
  31. Moreau, J. 1987. Mathematical and biological expression of growth in fishes: recent trends and further developments. pp. 81–113. In: R.C. Summerfelt & G.E. Halleed (ed.) Age and Growth of Fish, Iowa State University Press, Ames.Google Scholar
  32. Movchan, Z.V. & A.I. Smirnov. 1983. Fauna Ukraine 8. Naukova Dumka, Kiev: 97–99 (in Ukrainian).Google Scholar
  33. Munro, J.L. & D. Pauly. 1983. A simple method for comparing the growth of fish and invertebrates. Fishbyte 1(1): 5–6.Google Scholar
  34. Orlova, A.I. 1974. Ecological variability of bream populations in Lithuanian waters. 2. Age and growth rate. Trudy Akademii Nauk LitSSR, Ser. B, 2(66): 113–125 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  35. Paloheimo, J.E. & L.M. Dickie. 1965. Food and growth of fishes. I. A growth curve derived from experimental data. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 22: 521–542.Google Scholar
  36. Pauly, D. 1979. Gill size and temperature as governing factors in fish growth: a generalization of Von Bertalanffy's growth formula. Berichte aus dem Institute fuer Meereskunde 63, Kiel University, Kiel. 156 pp.Google Scholar
  37. Pauly, D. 1991. Growth performance in fishes: rigorous description of patterns as a basis for understanding causal mechanisms. Aquabyte 4(3): 3–6.Google Scholar
  38. Pauly, D. & J.L. Munro. 1984. Once more on growth comparisons of fish and invertebrates. Fishbyte 2(1): 4–21.Google Scholar
  39. Pivnicka, K. 1972. Index of production 3-a new parameter for evolution of growth and production capacity of fish illustrated with reference to roach, Rutilus rutilus (Linnaeus, 1758). Vest. Cs. Spolec. Zool. 36: 269–274.Google Scholar
  40. Poupe, J. 1971. The growth of the bream, Abramis brama (L.), in selected localities of Central and Eastern Europe (Pisces, Cyprinidae). Vest. Cs. Spolec. Zool. 35: 297–310.Google Scholar
  41. Ricker, W.E. 1975. Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations. Bull. Fish. Res. Board Can. 191, 382 pp.Google Scholar
  42. Ricker, W.E. 1979. Growth rate and models. pp. 677–743. In: W.S. Hoar, D.J. Randall & J.R. Brett (ed.) Fish Physiology, 8. Bioenergetics and growth, Academic Press, New-York.Google Scholar
  43. Roff, D.A. 1980. A motion for the retirement of the Von Bertalanffy function. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 37: 127–129.Google Scholar
  44. Segerstr0ale, C. 1933. :Uber scalimetrische Methoden zur Bestimmung des linearen Wachstums bei Fischen, insbesondere bei Leuciscus idus L., Abramis brama L. und Perca fluviatilis L. Acta Zool. Fen. 15: 1–168.Google Scholar
  45. Shmalgauzen, I.I. 1935. Definition of basic concepts and methods for growth study. pp. 8–60. In: Growth of Animals, Biomedgiz, Moscow (in Russian).Google Scholar
  46. Szczerbowsky, J.A. 1976. An attempt to establish the criteria of the assessment of fish growth. Rev. Trav. l'Institut Peches Mariti. 40: 750–751.Google Scholar
  47. Tanasiichuk, V.S. & L.N. Tanasiichuk. 1979. Adaptive abilities of bream. Sbornik Nauchnih Trudov Gosudarstvenogo Nachno-Issledovatelskogo Instituta Ozernogo i Rechnego Ribnogo Khozyaistva 141: 100–118 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  48. Taylor, C.C. 1962. Growth equation with metabolic parameters. J. Cons. Int. l'Explor. Mer. 27: 270–286.Google Scholar
  49. Tsyplyakov, E.P. 1969. Changes in reproduction of bream stocks in Kuibyshevskoe Reservoir. Voprosy ikhitiologii 9: 90–101 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  50. Vasnetsov, V.V. 1934. An attempt at a comparative analysis of the linear growth in the cyprinoid family. Zoologicheski zhurnal 13: 561–581 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  51. Zaveta, J. 1989. The growth parameter 3-a new index for the evaluation of the growth rate in fishes. Vest. Cs. Spolec. Zool. 53: 66–70.Google Scholar
  52. Zivkov, M.T. 1972. Critical analysis of some relative indices of the intensity of fish growth. Bull. l'Inst. Zool. (Sofia) 36: 81–101 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  53. Zivkov, M.T. 1982. On the effect and nature of growth compensation of fish. Vest. Cs. Spolec. Zool. 46: 142–160.Google Scholar
  54. Zivkov, M.T. & G.N. Petrova. 1991. Growth compensation of pike-perch. Stizostedion lucioperca (L.), in the Batak and Ovcharitsa dams. Compt. rend. l'Acad. bul. Sci. 44: 45–48.Google Scholar
  55. Zivkov, M.T. 1996. Critique of proportional hypotheses and methods for backcalculation of fish growth. Env. Biol. Fish. 46: 309–320.Google Scholar
  56. Zivkov, M.T. & G.N. Raikova-Petrova. 1996. Age composition, growth rate and mortality of the bream (Abramis brama L.) in the cooling reservoir Ovcharitsa (Bulgaria). Acta Univ. Carolinac Biol. 40: 203–212.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mladen T. Živkov
  • Teodora A. Trichkova
  • Galerida N. Raikova-Petrova

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations