Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The effect of follow-up on limiting non-participation bias in genetic epidemiologic investigations

  • Published:
European Journal of Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of a comprehensive follow-up strategy to limit non-participation bias was evaluated in a population-based case-control study of orofacial clefts. Birth parents were requested to provide exposure data, and index children and parents were asked to provide blood specimens. Follow-up included telephone or postal reminders every two weeks for up to three months. Consent to participate was received from 281 (76.6%) case mothers and 246 (72.4%) case fathers. The corresponding totals for controls were 279 (54.7%) and 245 (49.8%). Evaluation of participation rates by intensity of follow-up showed that 23% of case and 18% of control families consented without reminders (first stage); 81% of cases and 83% of controls agreed following one or two reminders (second stage); and the remainder of participants consented following three or more reminders (final stage). Cumulative distributions of sociodemographic characteristics differed little between second and final stage participants. Odds ratios for maternal multivitamin use were similar between second and final stage participants, whereas those for maternal and paternal smoking tended to decline. Although follow-up measures were necessary to enroll most families, use of more than two reminders did not appear to increase the representativeness of the sample; however, termination of recruitment after only two reminders would have led to different conclusions. Future studies require data collection protocols that encourage participation from all population subgroups, and one alternative is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Office fédéral de la santé publique. VIH et sida en Suisse jusqu'à la fin de 1994. Bulletin de l'OFSP 1995(3): 4–9.

    Google Scholar 

  2. WHO-EC Collaborating Centre on AIDS. AIDS surveillance in Europe. Quarterly report No 43, 30 September 1994. Saint-Maurice, France, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hausser D, Dubois-Arber F, Zimmermann E. Assessing AIDS prevention in Switzerland. In: Paccaud F, Vader JP, Gutzwiller F (eds), Assessing AIDS prevention. Basel: Birkhäuser, 1992: 116–122.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dubois-Arber F, Jeannin A, Meystre-Agustoni G, Gruet F, Paccaud F. Evaluation of the AIDS prevention strategy in Switzerland. Lausanne, Switzerland: Cah Rech DOC IUMSP No 82b, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jeannin A, Dubois-Arber F, Paccaud F. HIV Testing in Switzerland. AIDS 1994; 8: 1599–1603.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mertens T, Caraël M, Sato P, Cleland J, Ward H, Smith GD. Prevention indicators for evaluating the progress of national AIDS programmes. AIDS 1994; 8: 1359–1369.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Slutkin G. The evaluation of prevention efforts in national AIDS programmes. In: Paccaud F, Vader JP, Gutzwiller F (eds), Assessing AIDS prevention. Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag, 1992: 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Catania JA, Gibson DR, Chitwood DD, Coates TJ. Methodological problems in AIDS behavioral research: Influences on measurement error and participation bias in studies of sexual behavior. Psychol Bull 1990; 108(3): 339–362.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Boulton M. The methodological imagination. In: Boulton M (ed), Challenge an innovation: Methodological advances in social research on HIV/AIDS. London: Taylor & Francis, 1994: 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ferry B. Mesurer les comportements sexuels des populations generales des pays en développement–leçons des études récentes. Seminar on AIDS impact and prevention in the developing world: The contribution of demography and social science, Annecy (France), 5–9 December 1993.

  11. Dare OO, Cleland JG. Reliability and validity of survey data on sexual behaviour. IUESP: Séminaire sur ‘L'impact du sida et sa prévention dans les pays en développement: la contribution de la démographie et des sciences sociales’, Annecy (France), 5–9 December 1993.

  12. Konings E, Blattner WA, Levin A, Brubaker G, Siso Z, Shao J, et al. Sexual behaviour survey in a rural area of northwest Tanzania. AIDS 1994; 8: 987–993.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Konings E, Bantebya G, Carael M, Bagenda D, Mertens T. Validating population surveys for the measurement of HIV/STD prevention indicators. AIDS 1995; 9: 375–382.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Leridon H. La fréquence des rapports sexuels. Données et analyses de cohérence. Population 1993; 5: 1381–1408.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Riandey B, Firdion Jean-M. Vie personnelle et enquête téléphonique. L'exemple de l'enquête ACSF. Population 1993; 5: 1257–1280.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shea S, Stein AD, Lantigua R, Basch CE. Reliability of the behavioral risk factor survey in a triethnic population. Amer J Epidemiol 1991; 133: 489–500.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Stein AD, Lederman RI, Shea S. The behavioral risk factor surveillance system questionnaire: Reliability in a statewide sample. Am J Public Health 1993; 83(12): 1768–1772.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Davis PB, Yee RL, Chetwynd J, McMillan N. The New Zealand partner relations survey: Methodological results of a national telephone survey. AIDS 1993; 7: 1509–1516.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Brener ND, Collins JL, Kann L, Warren CW, Williams BI. Reliability of the youth risk behavior survey questionnaire. Amer J Epidemiol 1995; 141: 575–580.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Groves RM. Research on survey data quality. POQ 1987; 51: S156–S172.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Groves RM. Theories and methods of telephone surveys. Annu Rev Sociol 1990; 16: 221–240.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dijkstra W, van der Zouwen J, eds. Response behaviour in the survey interview. London: Academic Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hogarth RM, ed. Question framing and response consistency. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1982 (New directions for methodology of social and behavioral science; Number 11, March 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schuman H, Presser S. Questions & answers in attitude surveys. Experiments on question form, wording and context. New York: Academic Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bradburn NM. Response Effects. In: Rossi PH, Wright JD, Anderson AB (eds), Handbook of survey research. New York: Academic Press, 1983: 289–328.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Fiske DW, ed. Problems with language imprecision. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1981 (New directions for methodology of social and behavioral science; Number 9, September 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Office fédéral de la santé publique, Commission fédérale pour les problèmes liés au SIDA. Prévention du VIH en Suisse. Buts, stratégies, mesures. Berne: Office fédéral de la santé publique, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  28. ASCF principal investigators and their associates. Analysis of sexual behaviour in France (ACSF). A comparison between two modes of investigation: Telephone survey and face-to-face survey. AIDS 1992; 6: 315–323.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Groves RM, Kahn RL. Surveys by telephone. A national comparison with personal interviews. New York: Academic Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Messiah A, Blin P, Fiche V, ACSF group. Sexual repertoire of heterosexuals: Implications for HIV/sexually transmitted disease risk and prevention. AIDS 1995; 9: 1357–1365.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wellings K, Field J, Johnson AM, Wadsworth J. Sexual behaviour in Britain. The national survey of sexual attitudes and lifestyles. London: Penguin Books, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  32. ACSF Investigators. AIDS and sexual behaviour in France. Nature 1992 December 3; 360: 407–409.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Johnson AM, Wadsworth KW, Bradshaw S, Field J. Sexual Lifestyles and HIV Risk. Nature 1992 December; 360: 410–412.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Fife-Schaw CR, Breakwell GM. Estimating sexual behaviour parameters in the light of AIDS: A review of recent UK studies of young people. AIDS Care 1992; 4(2): 187–201.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Traeen B, Lewin B, Sundet JM. The real and the ideal: Gender differences in heterosexual behaviour among Norwegian adolescents. J Commun Appl Soc Psychol 1992; 2: 227–237.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Robertson BJ. Sexual behaviour and risk exposure to HIV among 18–25-years-olds in Scotland: Assessing change 1988–1993. AIDS 1995; 9: 285–292.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Caraël M, Cleland J, Deheneffe JC, Ferry B, Ingham R. Sexual behaviour in developing countries: Implications for HIV control. AIDS 1995; 9: 1171–1175.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa

    Paul A. Romitti, Jeffrey C. Murray, Sandra Daack-Hirsch & James W. Hanson

  2. Department of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Utah State University, Logan, Utah

    Ronald G. Munger

  3. Department of Preventive Medicine and Environmental Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA

    Trudy L. Burns

Authors
  1. Paul A. Romitti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ronald G. Munger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jeffrey C. Murray
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sandra Daack-Hirsch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. James W. Hanson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Trudy L. Burns
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Romitti, P.A., Munger, R.G., Murray, J.C. et al. The effect of follow-up on limiting non-participation bias in genetic epidemiologic investigations. Eur J Epidemiol 14, 129–138 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007406313703

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007406313703

Search

Navigation