Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Percutaneous blood exposure among Danish doctors: Exposure mechanisms and strategies for prevention

  • Published:
European Journal of Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study was to describe the mechanisms of percutaneous blood exposure (PCE) among doctors and discuss rational strategies for prevention. Data were obtained as part of a nation-wide questionnaire survey of occupational blood exposure among hospital employed doctors in Denmark. The doctors were asked to describe their most recent PCE, if any, within the previous 3 months. Detailed information on the instruments, procedures, circumstances and mechanisms that caused the PCE was obtained. Of 9375 doctors, 6256 (67%) responded, and 6005 questionnaires were eligible for analysis. Of 971 described PCE the majority were caused by suture needles (n = 483), IV-catheter-stylets (n = 94), injection needles (n = 75), phlebotomy needles (n = 53), scalpels (n = 45), arterial blood sample needles (n = 41) and bone fragments (n = 23). Inattentiveness was the most common cause, contributing to 30.5% of all PCE. Use of fingers rather than instruments was a major cause of injury in surgical specialties and was a contributing cause of 36.9% PCE on suture needles. Common contributing causes when fingers were used (n = 199) were poor space in (30.2%) or view of (18.6%) the operation field. It was often argued that instruments were not practical to use or might harm the tissue. Of 689 PCE in surgical specialties, 17.4% were inflicted by colleagues. Up to 53.3% of PCE on hollow-bore needles could be attributed to unsafe routines like recapping only, but other mechanisms like sudden patient movements and ‘acute situation’ were common, especially in the case of PCE on iv-catheter-stylets. It is concluded that the exposure mechanisms of PCE reflect both unsafe routines, difficult working conditions and unsafe devices. Education in safer working routines are needed in all specialties. Introduction of safer devices should have a high priority in surgical specialties, and should be considered in non-surgical specialties too.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mangione CM, Gerberding JL, Cummings SR. Occupational exposure to HIV: Frequency and rates of underreporting of percutaneous and mucocutaneous exposures by medical housestaff. Am J Med 1991; 90: 85–90.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kjaergard HK, Thiis J, Wiinberg N. Accidental injuries and blood exposure to cardiothoracic surgical teams. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1992; 6: 215–217.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gerberding JL, Littell C, Tarkington A, Brown A, Schecter WP. Risk of exposure of surgical personnel to patients' blood during surgery at San Francisco General Hospital. N Engl J Med 1990; 322: 1788–1793.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tokars JI, Bell DM, Culver DH, et al. Percutaneous injuries during surgical procedures. JAMA 1992; 267: 2899–2904.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lowenfels AB, Mehta V, Levi DA, Montecalvo MA, Savino JA, Wormser GP. Reduced frequency of percutaneous injuries in surgeons: 1993 versus 1988. AIDS 1995; 9: 199–202.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Henderson DK, Fahey BJ, Willy M, et al. Risk for occupational transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) associated with clinical exposures: A prospective evaluation. Ann Intern Med 1990; 113: 740–746.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Centers for Disease Control. Guidelines for prevention of transmission of human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis B virus to health-care and public-safety workers. MMWR 1989; 38Suppl 6: 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mitsui T, Iwano K, Masuko K, et al. Hepatitis C virus infection in medical personnel after needlestick accident. Hepatology 1992; 16: 1109–1114.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Centers for Disease Control. Recommendations for prevention of HIV transmission in health-care settings. MMWR 1987; 36(suppl 2): 1S–18S.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Becker MH, Janz NK, Band J, Bartley J, Snyder MB, Gaynes RP. Noncompliance with Universal Precautions Policy: Why do physicians and nurses recap needles? Am J Infect Control 1990; 18: 232–239.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hammond JS, Eckes JM, Gomez GA, Cunningham DN. HIV, trauma, and infection control: Universal precautions are universally ignored. J Trauma 1990; 30: 555–558.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Henry K, Campbell S, Collier P, Williams CO. Compliance with universal precautions and needle handling and disposal practices among emergency department staff at two community hospitals. Am J Infect Control 1994; 22: 129–137.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nelsing S, Nielsen TL, Brønnum-Hansen H, Nielsen JO. Incidence and risk factors of occupational blood exposure: A nation-wide survey among Danish doctors. Eur J epidemiol 1997; 13(1): 0–0.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Corlett MP, England DW, Kidner NL, Attard AR, Fraser IA. Reduction in incidence of glove perforation during laparotomy wound closure by ‘no touch’ technique. Ann Royal Coll Surg 1993; 75: 330–332.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dauleh MI, Irving aD, Townell NH. Needle prick injury to the surgeon: Do we need sharp needles? J R Coll Surg Edinb 1994; 39: 310–311.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wright KU, Moran CG, Briggs PJ. Glove perforation during hip arthroplasty. Br J Bone Joint Surg 1993; 75-B: 918–920.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Miller SS, Sabharwal A. Subcuticular skin closure using a ‘blunt’ needle. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1994; 76: 281.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Atabey A. A new surgical instrument: Nonsticking skin hook. Plastic Reconstruct Surg 1994; 94: 552–554.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tsang WYW, Chan JKC, Chan SK. Fine-needle aspiration anchor: A simple device to prevent needle-stick injury at fine-needle aspiration. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1993; 117: 1047–1049.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fisher AA. Protective value of surgical gloves including the ‘cut resistant variety’. CUTIS 1992; 49: 310–312.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Doyle PM, Alvi S, Johanson R. The effectiveness of double-gloving in obstetrics and gynaecology. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992; 99: 83–84.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Johnson GK, Nolan T, Wuh HC, Robinson WS. Efficacy of glove combinations in reducing cell culture infection after glove puncture with needles contaminated with human immunodeficiency virus type 1. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1991; 12: 435–438.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mast ST, Woolwine JD, Gerberding JL. Efficacy of gloves in reducing blood volumes transferred during simulated needlestick injury. J Infect Dis 1993; 168: 1589–1592.

    Google Scholar 

  24. McCormick RD, Maki DG. Epidemiology of needle stick injuries in hospital personnel. Am J Med 1981; 70: 928–932.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Linnemann CC, Cannon C, DeRonde M, Lanphear B. Effect of educational programs, rigid sharps containers, and universal precautions on reported needlestick injuries in health care workers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1991; 12: 214–219.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Haiduven DJ, DeMaio TM, Stevens DA. A five-year study of needlestick injuries: Significant reduction associated with communication, education and convenient placement of sharps containers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1992; 13: 265–271.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ippolito G, De Carli G, Puro V, et al. Device-specific risk of needlestick injury in Italian health care workers. JAMA 1994; 272: 607–610.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Watters J, MacCallum R, Maurice S, Robertson C. Safelon: A new device to reduce needle-stick injuries during intravenous cannulation.

  29. Friedland LR. Universal precautions and safety devices which reduce the risk of occupational exposure to blood-borne pathogens: A review for emergency health care workers. Pediatr Emerg Care 1991; 7: 356–362.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Infectious Diseases, Hvidovre Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark

    Suzanne Nelsing, Thyge Lynghøj Nielsen & Jens Ole Nielsen

Authors
  1. Suzanne Nelsing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thyge Lynghøj Nielsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jens Ole Nielsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nelsing, S., Nielsen, T.L. & Nielsen, J.O. Percutaneous blood exposure among Danish doctors: Exposure mechanisms and strategies for prevention. Eur J Epidemiol 13, 387–393 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007369016717

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007369016717

Search

Navigation