Abstract
Both cover and light intensity are important factors in microhabitat selection of fishes, suggesting a possible hierarchical relationship. Many centrarchids have been shown to prefer low light intensities and heavy submerged cover, but adult nonbreeding longear sunfish are reported to occupy sparsely vegetated, clear, shallow water during the brightest part of the day, probably for foraging. To determine the relative importance of cover and light intensity to longear sunfish, we presented nonbreeding adults with choices between these two conditions in a series of three laboratory experiments. Longear sunfish preferred low light to high light intensity and preferred submerged cover to no cover. However, when given a choice, they preferred to occupy low light intensity conditions without cover rather than submerged cover under higher light intensity conditions. Thus, low light intensity, such as is found in greater pool depths, may be the preferred refuge from predation for longear sunfish.
Similar content being viewed by others
References cited
Breder, C.M. 1936. The reproductive habits of the North American sunfishes (family Centrarchidae). Zoologica 21:1–48.
Cerri, R.D. 1983. The effect of light intensity on predator and prey behavior in cyprinid fish: factors that influence prey risk. Anim. Behav. 31:736–742.
Ham, K.D. & W.H. Neill. 1993. Photoregulatory behavior of bluegill, Lepomis machrochira, in a virtual light gradient. Env. Biol. Fish. 37:205–211.
Harvey, B.C. 1991. Interactions among stream fishes: predator-induced habitat shifts and larval survival. Oecologia 87:29–36.
Jennings, M.J. & D.P. Philipp. 1992. Reproductive investment and somatic growth rates in longear sunfish. Env. Biol. Fish. 35:257–271.
Johnson, S.L. 1993. Cover choice by bluegills: orientation of underwater structure and light intensity. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 122:148–154.
Langley, R.G., J.W. Driscoll & P.W. Colgan. 1993. Diurnal rhythms of activity in three species of sunfishes (Lepomis spp., Centrarchidae). J. Interdiscipl. Cycle Res. 24:56–64.
Laughlin, D.R. & E.E. Werner. 1980. Resource partitioning in two coexisting sunfish: pumpkinseed (Lepomis gibbosus) and northern longear sunfish (Lepomis megalotis peltastes). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 37:1411–1420.
Moyle, P. B. & Cech, J. J. 1988. Fishes, 2nd ed. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs. 559 pp.
Pflieger, W.L. 1975. The fishes of Missouri. Missouri Department of Conservation Publication, Jefferson City. 343 pp.
Probst, W. 1983. Habitat use of centrarchids in the Ozark National Scenic Riverways. M.S. Thesis, University of Missouri, Columbia. 88 pp.
Sokal, R.R. & F.J. Rohlf. 1995. Biometry, 3rd ed. Freeman and Company, New York. 887 pp.
Tomelleri, J.R. & M.E. Eberle. 1990. Fishes of the central United States. University Press of Kansas, Lawrence. 226 pp.
Wetzel, R.G. 1983. Limnology, 2nd ed. Saunders, Philidelphia. 743 pp.
Zar, J.H. 1984. Biostatistical analysis, 2nd ed. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs. 718 pp.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goddard, K., Mathis, A. Microhabitat preferences of longear sunfish: low light intensity versus submerged cover. Environmental Biology of Fishes 49, 495–499 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007310716617
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007310716617