Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of the Avoximeter: precision, long-term stability, linearity, and use without heparin

  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Monitoring Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives. Because the AVOXimeter uses disposable cuvettes and makesits measurements directly in whole blood without first hemolyzing the sample,it does not need the care and maintenance that conventional co-oximetersrequire, it operates faster than conventional co-oximeters, and it is lessexpensive. Therefore, the objectives of this study were (1) to evaluate theprecision and linearity of the AVOXimeter’s measurements of totalhemoglobin concentration and oxyhemoglobin saturation; (2) to assess itslong-term stability and thus the required interval for re-calibration; (3) todetermine whether measurements can be made without anticoagulants; and (4) toassess the feasibility of storing blood samples in the disposable cuvettes.Methods. Measurements made by the test instrument were compared withthose of conventional co-oximeters or with standardized hemoglobin solutions.Blood samples were also collected with and without heparin to determinewhether anticoagulation is necessary. Results. Our tests confirmed thespecified precision of 0.3 g/dl for total hemoglobin and 0.5% foroxyhemoglobin. The results also showed that these measurements were linearwhen compared with a conventional co-oximeter, and they were consistent withthe specified accuracy of 0.45 g/dl for total hemoglobin and 1% foroxyhemoglobin. Weekly checks with control solutions showed that the instrumentholds its calibration for a year or more. Although treating syringes withheparin caused dilution errors, heparin did not affect the measurements whendilution was avoided. When blood samples were placed in disposable cuvettesand read repeatedly at 1-min intervals for 20 min, the readings driftedappreciably away from the original value. This drift occurred so slowly thatreadings taken at the first and second minute after the cuvette was filledwere within 1 or 2% of the original reading. Conclusions. In ourexperience, the test instrument was simple and easy to operate. It met thespecifications for precision and accuracy, its measurements were highlylinear, and it maintained a stable calibration for one year. If the cuvettesare filled as soon as blood is drawn, anticoagulation is unnecessary. However,the cuvettes should be read with 1 min of filling the cuvette.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Gong AK. Near-patient measurement of methemoglobin, oxygen saturation, and total hemoglobin: Evaluation of a new instrument for adult and neonatal intensive care. Critical Care Medicine 1995; 23: 193—201

    Google Scholar 

  2. Freeman GL, Steinke JM. Evaluation of two oximeters for use in cardiac catheterization laboratories. Catheterization and Cardiovasc. Diagnosis 1993; 30: 51—57

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kirshon B, Moise KJ, Jr. Effect of heparin on umbilical arterial blood gases. J Reprod Med 1989; 34: 267—269

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gayed AM, Marino ME, Dolanski EA. Comparison of the effects of dry and liquid heparin on neonatal arterial blood gases. Am J Perinatol 1992; 9: 159—161

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wuillemin WA, Gerber AU. Sources of error in the preanalytical phase of blood gas analysis. Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax 1995; 84: 200—203

    Google Scholar 

  6. Muller-Plathe O, Schreiber R. An electrolyte-adapted heparin solution for the determination of blood gases and electrolytes in whole blood. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 1991; 26: 161—164

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zuerlein TJ. Heparin's effect on blood gas analysis. Am J Dis Child 1990; 144: 168—172

    Google Scholar 

  8. Boidin MR, Jorna P. Influence of different heparin solutions upon blood gas analysis and biochemical values measured in plasma. Intensive Care Med 1984; 10: 255—260

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hutchison AS, Ralston SH, Dryburgh FJ, Small M, Fogelman I. Too much heparin: Possible source of error in blood gas analysis. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1983; 287(6399): 1131—1132

    Google Scholar 

  10. Turton M. Heparin solution as a source of error in blood gas determination. Clin Chem 1983; 29: 1562—1563

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mann SE, Green A. Interference from heparin in commercial heparinised tubes in the measurement of plasma sodium by ion selective electrode: A note of caution. Ann Clin Biochem 1986; 23 (Pt 3): 355—356

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stromme JH, Theodorsen L. Heparin interference in the measurement of gamma-glutamyltransferase activity with the Scandinavian and the IFCC recommended method. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1985; 45: 437—442

    Google Scholar 

  13. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards: Evaluation of precision performance of clinical chemistry devices. Villanova, PA, NCCLS Document EP5-T2, vol. 12, no.4, 1992

  14. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards: Fractional oxyhemoglobin, oxygen content and saturation, and related quantities in blood: Terminology, measurement, and reporting. Villanova, PA, NCCLS Document C25-T, vol. 12, no.11, 1992

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bailey, S.R., Russell, E.L. & Martinez, A. Evaluation of the Avoximeter: precision, long-term stability, linearity, and use without heparin. J Clin Monit Comput 13, 191–198 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007308616686

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007308616686

Navigation