Skip to main content
Log in

Measurement of Women's Reproductive Health and Reproductive Rights: An Analysis of Developing Countries

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study attempts to develop measurement scales for women'sreproductive health and reproductive rights by using data from125 developing countries. Data were obtained from varioussources, such as the United Nations and the World Bank. Existing studies on women's reproductive rights suggest atwo-factor model. Women's reproductive health is viewed as beingunidimensional. These proposed attributes are evaluated usingconfirmatory factor analysis. Results indicate the presence oftwo sub-dimensions related to women's reproductive rights. Aone-dimension model of women's reproductive health is empiricallysupported. Validity and reliability of the scales are assessed.Limitations of the measurement scales are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Benson, J. and K. Hagtvet: 1996, ‘The interplay between design, data analysis, and theory in the measurement of coping’ in M. Zeidner and N. Endler (eds.), Handbook of Coping: Theory, Research, Applications (Wiley, New York), pp. 83–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunch, Charlotte: 1990, ‘Women's rights as human rights: Toward a re-vision of human rights’ Human Rights Quarterly 12, pp. 486–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmine, E. G. and R. A. Zeller: 1979, Reliability and Validity Assessment (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Rebecca J.: 1993, ‘International human rights and women's reproductive health’ Studies in Family Planning 24(2), pp. 73–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Rebecca J.: 1995, ‘Human rights and reproductive self-determination’ American Law Review 44(4), pp. 975–1016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T. D. and D. T. Campbell: 1979, Quasi-Experimentation (Rand McNally, Skokie).

  • Correa, Sonya: 1994, Population and Reproductive Rights: Feminist Perspectives from the South (Zed Books Ltd., London and New Jersey).

    Google Scholar 

  • Correa, Sonya: 1999, ‘From reproductive health to sexual rights: Achievements and future challenges’ www.hsph.harvard.edu/Organizations/healthnet/ reprorights/docs/correa.html.

  • Correa, Sonya and R. Petchesky: 1994, ‘Reproductive and sexual rights: a feminist perspective’ in Gita Sen, A. Germain and L. C. Chen (eds.), Population Policies Reconsidered: Health, Empowerment, and Rights (Harvard University Press, Boston, MA), pp. 107–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon-Mueller, Ruth: 1993, Population Policy and Women's Rights (Praeger, Westport, Connecticut).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fathalla, Mahmoud: 1991, ‘Reproductive health: A global overview’ Annuals N.Y. Academy of Sciences 626, pp. 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, Lynn: 1999, ‘Reflections on emerging frameworks of health and human rights’ in Jonathan M. Mann, Sofia Gruskin, Michael Gordin and George Annas (eds.), Health and Human Rights (Routledge, New York, NY), pp. 227–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fried, Marlene Gerber: 1990, ‘Transforming the reproductive rights movement: the post-webster agenda’ in Marlene Gerber Fried (ed.), From Abortion to Reproductive Freedom: Transforming a Movement (South End Press, Boston, MA), pp. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Moreno, Claudia and Amparo Claro: 1994, ‘Challenges from the women's health movement: women's rights versus population control’ in Gita Sen, Adrienne Germain, and Lincoln Chen (eds.), Population Policies Reconsidered: Health, Empowerment, and Rights (Harvard University Press, Boston, MA), pp. 47–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Germain, Adrienne, S. Nowrojee and H. Pyne: 1994, ‘Setting a new agenda: sexual and reproductive health and rights’ in Gita Sen, A. Germain and L.C. Chen (eds.), Population Policies Reconsidered: Health, Empowerment, and Rights (Harvard University Press, Boston, MA), pp. 27–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, Betsy: 1987, Reproductive Rights andWrongs (Harper and Row, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heitlinger, Alena: 1993, Women's Equality, Demography and Public Policy (St. Martin's Press, New York, NY).

  • Humana, Charles: 1992, World Human Rights Guide (Oxford University Press, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • International Labor Office: 1994, Maternity andWork: Conditions ofWork Digest Vol. 13 (United Nations, Geneva).

    Google Scholar 

  • International Programs Center: 1999, HIV/AIDS Surveillance Data Base (U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jejeeebhoy, Shireen: 1998, ‘Adolescent sexual and reproductive behavior: a review of the evidence from India’ Social Science and Medicine 46(10), pp. 1275–1290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazanjian, Arminee: 1998, ‘Understandingwomen's health through data development and data linkage: Implications for research and policy’ Canadian Medical Association Journal 159, pp. 342–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, Sandra D.: 1994, ‘From population control to reproductive health: an emerging policy agenda’ Social Science and Medicine 39(9), pp. 1303–1314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, M. Jonathan: 1996, ‘Human rights and aids: The future of the pandemic’ The John Marshall Law Review 30(1), pp. 195–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, M. Jonathan: 1997, ‘Medicine and public health, ethics and human rights’ Hastings Center Report 27(3), pp. 6–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, Susan A.: 1996, ‘Toward a synthesis of feminist and demographic perspectives on fertility’ The Sociological Quarterly 37(1), pp. 83–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, Susan A.: 2000, ‘The demographic category as leaky gender boundary’ paper presented at the American Sociological Association meeting, Washington D.D., August 12–16, 2000.

  • Pillai, Vijayan K. and Guang-zhen Wang: 1999a, Women's Reproductive Rights in Developing Countries (Ashgate, England).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillai, Vijayan K. and Guang-zhen Wang: 1999b, ‘Social structural model of women's reproductive rights: A cross-national study of developing countries’ The Canadian Journal of Sociology (CJS) 24(2), pp. 255–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poe, Steven C., Dierdre Wendel-Blunt and Karl Ho: 1997, ‘Global patterns in the achievement of women's human rights to equality’ Human Rights Quarterly 19(4), pp. 813–835.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poe, Steven C., C. Neal Tate and Linda Camp Keith: 1999, ‘Repression of the human right to personal integrity revisited: A global cross-national study covering the year 1976–1993’ International Studies Quarterly 43(2), pp. 291–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Gita: 1994, ‘Reproduction: the feminist challenge to social policy’ in Gita Sen and Rachel Snow (eds.), Power and Decision: The Social Control of Reproduction (Harvard University Press, Boston, MA), pp. 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations: 1997, Statistics and Indicators on the World's Women (United Nations, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations: 1999a, World Abortion Policies (United Nations, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations: 1999b, World Fertility Patterns 1997 (Oxford University Press, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Child Fund: 1998, The State of the World's Children (Oxford University Press, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Programme (UNDP): 1999, Human Development Report 1999 (Oxford University Press, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, Ellen: 1999, ‘Environment, health, and gender in Latin America: trends and research issues’ Environmental Research 80(3), pp. 253–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank: 1998, A New Agenda for Women's Health and Nutrition (Oxford University Press, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank: 1999, World Development Report 1998–99 (Oxford University Press, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization: 1998, Progress in Human Reproductive Research. No. 45, 1998. www.who.int/hrp/progress/45/05.html.

  • World Resources Institute: 1998, World Resources: A Guide to the Global Environment (Oxford University Press, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamin, Alicia Ely: 1996, ‘Defining questions: Situating issues of power in the formulation of a right to health under international law’ Human Rights Quarterly 18, pp. 398–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zurayk, H, N. Younis and H. Khattab: 1994, ‘Rethinking family planning policy in the light of reproductive heath research’ International Social Science Journal 46(3), pp. 423–438.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, Gz., Pillai, V.K. Measurement of Women's Reproductive Health and Reproductive Rights: An Analysis of Developing Countries. Social Indicators Research 54, 17–35 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007268913770

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007268913770

Keywords

Navigation