Abstract
The findings provide strong evidence to support theExtended Satisfaction with Life Scale (ESWLS) as a valuable research technique for thestudy of subjective quality of life. Alfonso et al. (1996) developed the ESWLSapplying research of leading scholars who have focused on improving the measurementof quality of life over the past 30 years. Factor analysis and psychometric tests wereapplied to document the excellent properties of the ESWLS as a survey instrument. The current research proposes important modifications of theESWLS that extend its value for survey studies of diverse populations. The majormodifications include: adding survey items to measure income, health, and safety domains which havebeen demonstrated to be important components of life quality (Cummins, 1996); reducingthe number of survey items for each quality of life domain from five to two, thus decreasingthe number of items on the revised ESWLS to 22 from the original 50; and, reducing theseven-point Likert scale to five points. The last two changes were made to reduce responsetime and respondent fatigue in completing the self-report survey instrument. Respondentsincluded low income welfare clients and recently dislocated workers (n = 151); and, adult,part-time students in social work and counseling programs (n = 101). Orthogonal and oblique solutions for the modified ESWLS delineatevery comparable, stable factor structures using responses from diversepopulations. Using the additional, rescaled survey items, these findings provide strong support forthe ESWLS in its simplified and expanded formats. This application of the original andexpanded versions of the ESWLS finds the expanded version adds to the strength and usefulness ofthe instrument for the measurement of quality of life in a broader range ofcircumstances.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Alfonso, V. C., D. B. Allison, D. E. Rader and B. S. Gorman: 1996, ‘The extended satisfaction with life scale: development and psychometric properties’ Social Indicators Research 38, pp. 275–301.
Andrews, F. M. and S. B. Withey: 1976, Social Indicators of Well-Being: American's Perceptions of Life Quality (Plenum Books, New York).
Bendig, A. W.: 1954, ‘Reliability and the number of rating scale categories’ Journal of Applied Psychology 38, pp. 8–10.
Campbell, A., P. E. Converse and W. L. Rogers: 1976, The Quality of American Life: Perceptions, Evaluations, and Satisfactions (Russell Sage, New York).
Cureton, E. E. and S. A. Malik: 1975, ‘The weighted varimax rotation and the promax Rotation’ Psychometrica 40, pp. 183–195.
Cummins, R. A.: 1996, ‘The domains of life satisfaction: An attempt to order chaos’ Social Indicators Research 38, pp. 303–328.
Diener, E., E. Sandvik, L. Seidlitz and M. Diener: 1993, ‘The relationship between income and subjective well-being: relative or absolute?’ Social Indicators Research 29, pp. 195–223.
Diener, E. and E. Suh: 1997, ‘Measuring quality of life: Economic, social, and subjective indicators’ Social Indicators Research 40, pp. 189–216.
Gorsuch, R. L.: 1983, Factor Analysis, 2nd edn. (Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey).
Green, P. E. and V. R. Rao: 1970, ‘Rating scales and information recovery-how many scales and response categories to use?’ Journal of Marketing 34, pp. 33–49.
Jacoby, J. and M. Mattell: 1971, ‘Three point Likert scales are good enough’ Journal of Marketing Research 8, pp. 495–500.
Julnes, G.: 1999, ‘Principal component analysis, factor analysis, and cluster analysis’ in G. J. Miller and M. L. Whicker (eds.), Handbook of Research Methods in Public Administration (Marcel Dekker, New York), pp. 549–598.
Kim, J. O. and C. W. Mueller: 1978, Factor Analysis (Sage Publications, California).
Komorita, S. S.: 1963'Attitude content, intensity, and the neutral point on the Likert scale’ The Journal of Social Psychology 61, pp. 327–334.
Komorita, S. S. and K. Graham: 1965, ‘Number of scale points and the reliability of scales’ Educational and Psychological Measurement 4, pp.987–995.
Likert, R. A.: 1932, ‘A technique for the measurement of attitudes’ Archives of Psychology, No. 140, 55 (New York).
Mattel, M. and J. Jacoby: 1972, ‘Is there an optimal number of alternatives for Likert items?’ Journal of Applied Psychology 56 pp. 506–509.
Miller, G. A.: 1956, ‘The magic number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our processing of information’ Psychological Review 63, pp. 81–97.
Mullis, R. J.: 1992, ‘Measures of economic well-being as predictors of psychological well-being’ Social Indicators Research 26, pp. 119–135.
Munshi, J.: 1990, ‘A method of constructing Likert scales’ http://munshi.sonoma.edu/Working/likert.html, pp. 1–10.
Murphy, G. and R. A. Likert: 1938, Public Opinion and the Individual: A Psychological Study of Student Attitudes on Public Questions With a Re-Test Five Years Later (Harper Books, New York).
Peabody, D.: 1962, ‘Two components in bipolar scales: Direction and extremeness’ Psychological Review 69, pp. 65–73.
Pemberton, E.: 1933, ‘A technique for measuring the optimum rating scale for opinion measures’ Sociology and Social Research 17, pp. 470–472.
SAS Institute Inc.: 1985, ‘SAS User's Guide: Statistics, Version 5 Edition’ (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina), pp. 335–375.
Simon, H. A. and A. Newell: 1971, ‘Human problem solving: The state of theory in 1970’ American Psychologist 26, pp. 145–159.
Spearman, C.: 1904, ‘General intelligence' objectively determined and measured’ American Journal of Psychology 15, pp. 201–293.
Tabachnick, B. G. and L. S. Fidell: 1996, Using Multivariate Statistics, 3rd edn. (Harper Collins, New York).
Thurstone, L. L.: 1928, ‘Attitudes can be measured’ The American Journal of Sociology 33, pp. 529–554.
Thurstone, L. L.: 1935, Vectors of the Mind (University of Chicago, Illinois).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gregg, P.M., Salisbury, P.S. Confirming and Expanding the Usefulness of the Extended Satisfaction With Life Scale (ESWLS). Social Indicators Research 54, 1–16 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007221030609
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007221030609