Abstract
In this paper I explore the interactions between colonial law and native customary law in the formation of contemporary property regimes in a rural village in Sabah, Malaysia, that I call Govuton. Govuton was one of the few known villages in Sabah that rejected colonial policies of land settlement that focused on settling private, individual property claims. Instead, village leaders negotiated with colonial officials for their village lands to be legally designated as corporately-held village property under the title of “Native Reserve.” While the Native Reserve served to protect village access to jointly-held property in the colonial period, in the contemporary period new land disputes are arising as different images of community and tradition are strategically deployed by villagers in order to win struggles over rights of ownership and access to resources in the current political economy. By adopting such an historical and site-specific view of the transformation of property rights several broader themes regarding the relationship between state and society and natural resource management emerge. First, this case study challenges the idea the colonial governments were a monolithic force imposing laws on an unresisting native population. Second, the notion that “the community” is an appropriate unit for natural resource management is questioned. And finally, this case study raises the possibility that the current trend toward strengthening or reinvigorating native customary law is not always in the interests of native peoples with diverse interests in natural resource management.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Agrawal, Arun (1999a). “Community-in-Conservation: Tracing the Outlines of an Enchanting Concept.” pp. 92–108 in Roger Jeffery and Nandini Sundar. A New Moral Economy for India's Forests: Discourses of Community Participation. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Agrawal, Arun (1999b). “Enchantments and Disenchantment: The Role of Community in Natural Resource Conservation.” World Development 27(4): 629–49.
Appell, George (1995). “Community Resources in Borneo: Failure of the Concept of Common Property and Its Implications for the Conservation of Forest Resources and the Protection of Indigenous land Rights,” Bulletin Series No. 98, Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies.
Appell, George (1992). “The History of Research on Traditional Land Tenure and Tree Ownership in Borneo,” Paper delivered at the Second Biennial Conference of the Borneo Research Council. July 13–17, 1992, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia.
Appell, George (1991). “Resource Management Regimes among the Swidden Agriculturists of Borneo: Does the Concept of Common Property Adequately Map Indigenous Systems of Ownership?,” Paper present at the International Association for the Study of Common Property Conference, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, September, 28: 1991.
Appell, George (1987). “Emergent Structuralism:The Design of an Inquiry System to Delineate the Production and Reduction of Social Forms,” pp. 43–60 in Appell, G., and Madan, T. eds., Choice and Morality: Essays in Honor of Derek Freeman. Buffalo: State University of New York Press.
Appell, George (1986). “Kayan Land Tenure and the Distribution of Devolvable Usufruct in Borneo,” Borneo Research Bulletin 18: 199–130.
Appell, George (1985). “Land Tenure and Development Among the Rungus of Sabah, Malaysia,” pp. 111–155 in Appell, G. ed. Modernization and the Emergence of a Landless Peasantry.” Studies in Third World Societies. Williamsburg, Va.: College of William and Mary.
Berry, Sara (1993). No Condition is Permanent: The Social Dynamics of Agrarian Change in Sub-Saharan Africa. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Brosius, Peter (1997). “Transcripts, Divergent Paths: Resistance and Acquiescence to Logging in Sarawak, East Malaysia,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 39: 468–510.
Brosius, Peter, Anna L. Tsing, and Charles Zerner (1998). “Representing Communities: Histories and Polities of Community-Based Natural Resource Management,” Society and Natural Resources 11: 157–168.
Circular Notice to Officers (1928). North Borneo Company Archive file # 815, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah.
Comaroff, John (1989). “Images of Empire, Contests of Conscience: Models of Colonial Domination in South Africa,” American Ethnologist 16: 661–685.
Corrigan, P. (1994). “State Formation,” pp. xvii–xix in Joseph, G., and Nugent, D. eds. Everyday Forms of State Formation. Durham: Duke University Press.
Director of Agriculture (1958). “Letter from the Director of Agriculture to the West Coast,” January 6, 1958. Files in the Ranau Native Court office.
Director of Lands and Surveys (1957). “Letter from the Director of Lands and Surveys to All Residents” 17 October 1957, Ranau District Office Records.
Doolittle, Amity (1999). “Controlling the Land: Property Rights and Power Struggles in Sabah, Malaysia, 1881–1996,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Yale University.
Doolittle, Amity (1998). “Historical and Contemporary Views of Legal Pluralism in Sabah, Malaysia.” Common Property Resource Digest. Vol. 47: 1–5.
Dove, Michael (1985). “The Kantu Land Tenure System: The Evolution of Tribal Rights in Borneo,” pp. 159–82 in Appell, G. ed. Modernization and the Emergence of a Landless Peasantry.” Studies in Third World Societies. Williamsburg, Va.: College of William and Mary.
Dove, Michael (1983). “Theories of Swidden Agriculture and the Political Economy of Ignorance,” Agroforestry Systems, Vol. 1(3): 85–89.
Freeman, Derek (1970). Report on the Iban. London: The Athlone Press.
Gupta, Akhil (1995). “Blurred Boundaries: The Discourse of Corruption, the culture of politics and the Imagined State,” American Ethnologist 22(2): 375–402.
Gupta, Akhil (1998). Postcolonial Developments: Agriculture in the Making of Modern India. Durham: Duke University Press.
Harper, T. (1997). “Forest Politics in Colonial Malaya,” Modern Asian Studies 31(1): 1–29.
Kitayama, K. (1987). “Vegetation of Mount Kinabalu,” Review of Forest Culture 8: 103–113.
Kurus, Bilson (1994). “Review on the Role and Functions of the Local Chieftain System in Sabah,” Borneo Review 5(1): 1–21.
Li, Tania (1996). “Images of Community: Discourse and Strategy in Property Relations.” Development and Change 27: 501–527.
Li, Tania (1997). “Engaging Simplifications: Community Based Resource Management, Local Processes and State Agendas in Upland Southeast Asia,” Paper presented at the conference Representing Communities: Histories and Politics of Community Based Resource Management, Unicoi, GA, June 1997.
Li, Tania (1999). “Marginality, Power and Production: Analyzing Upland Transformation,” in Tania Li, (ed). Agrarian Transformations in Upland Indonesia. London: Harwood Academic Publishers.
Lynch, Owen and Kirk Talbott. (1995). “Balancing Acts: Community-Based Forest Management and National Law in Asia and the Pacific.” Washington D.C.: World Resource Institute.
Moniaga, Sandra (1993). “Toward Community-Based Forestry and Recognition of Adat Property Rights in the Outer Islands of Indonesia,” pp. 131–150 in Fox, J. ed. Legal Frameworks for Forest Management in Asia: Case Studies of Community/State Relations. Occasional Papers of the Programs on Government, No. 16. Honolulu: East-West Center0.
Moore, Donald (1993). “Contesting Terrain in Zimbabwe's Highlands: Political Ecology, Ethnography, and Peasant Resource Struggles,” Economic Geography 69: 390–401.
Moore, Donald (1997). “Remapping Resistance: ‘Grounds for Struggle’ and the Politics of Place,” pp. 87–106 in Steve Pile and Michael Keith, eds. Geographies of Resistance. New York: Routledge.
Moore, Sally Falk (1986). Social Facts and Fabrication: “Customary” Law on Kilimanjaro, 1880–1980. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nugent, D. (1994). “Building the State, Making the Nation: The Bases and Limits of State Centralization in ‘Modern’ Peru,” American Anthropologist 96(2): 333–369.
Ongkili, James (1972). Modernization in East Malaysia, 1960–1970. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.
Peluso, Nancy (1998). “Legal Pluralism and Legacies of ‘Customary Rights’ in Indonesian and Malaysian Borneo.” Common Property Resource Digest. Vol. 47: 10–13.
Peluso, Nancy (1996). “Fruit Trees and Family Trees in an Anthropogenic Forest: Ethics of Access, Property Zones, and Environmental Change in Indonesia,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 38: 510–548.
Peluso, Nancy (1992). Rich Forests, Poor People: Resource Control and Resistance in Java. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Peluso, Nancy and Peter Vandergeest (1998). “Genealogies of Forest Law and Customary Rights in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand.” Manuscript.
Peters, Pauline (1994). Dividing the Commons: Politics, Policy, and Culture in Botswana. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
Phelan, Peter (1988). '‘Native Land in Sabah: Its Administrators: Headmen and Native Chiefs,’ Sabah Society Journal VIII(4): 475–501.
Ross-Larson, Bruce. (1976). ThePolitics ofFederalism: SyedKechik in East Malaysia. Singapore: Bruce Ross-Larson.
Sather, Clifford (1990). “Trees and Tree Tenure in Paku Iban Society: The Management of Secondary Forest Resources in a Long-Established Iban Community.” Borneo Review 1: 16–40.
Scott, James (1998). Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition have Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Scott, James (1976). The Moral Economy of the Peasantry: Rebellion and Subsistence in Southeast Asia. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Thompson, E. P. (1975). Whigs and Hunters: The Origins of the Black Act. NewYork: Pantheon.
Tregonning, K. (1965). A History of Modern Sabah. Singapore: University of Malaya Press.
Tsing, Anna (1993). In the Realm of the Diamond Queen. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
West Coast Resident (1958). “Letter from the West Coast Resident to the Chief Secretary,” April 28, 1958. Files in the Ranau Native Court office.
West Coast Resident Chisholm (1957). “Letter from West Coast Resident Chisholm to other Residents,” 26 November 1957, Ranau District Office Records.
Woolley, G. C. (1953a). “Tuaran Adat,” Native Affairs Bulletin, No. 2. North Borneo Government Printer.
Woolley, G.C. (1953b). “Murut Adat,” Native Affairs Bulletin,No. 3. North Borneo Government Printer.
Woolley, G.C. (1953c). “Dusun Adat” Native Affairs Bulletin,No. 4. North Borneo Government Printer.
Woolley, G. C. (1953d). “Dusun Adat,” Native Affairs Bulletin, No. 5. North Borneo Government Printer.
Woolley, G. C. (1953e). “Kwijau Adat,” Native Affairs Bulletin, No.6. North Borneo Government Printer.
Woolley, G. C. (1962a). “The Timoguns,” Native Affairs Bulletin, No. 1. North Borneo Government Printer.
Woolley, G. C. (1962b). “Dusun Customs in Putatan District,” Native Affairs Bulletin, No. 7. North Borneo Government Printer.
Yahya Bin Mohamad (1990). “Perkembangan Ugama Kristan di Sabah Setelah Meredeka: Sorotan pada Zaman-Zaman Kerajaan Part Perikatan USNO-SCA Kerajjan Pari Berjaya dan Kerajaan Part PBS.” UKM, Bangi.
Zerner, Charles. (1994). “Through a Green Lens: The Construction of Customary Environmental Law and Community in Indonesia's Maluku Islands,” Law and Society Review 28(5): 1079–1121.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Doolittle, A.A. From Village Land to “Native Reserve”: Changes in Property Rights in Sabah, Malaysia, 1950–1996. Human Ecology 29, 69–98 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007195722142
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007195722142