Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Models and Measurements of Psychological Androgyny: A Cross-Cultural Extension of Theory and Research

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explores models and measurements of psychological androgyny by extending research to a new cultural context—Singapore. Five studies, which include the construction of a culturally appropriate measurement of masculinity and femininity and the investigation of the masculine, additive, and interactive models of psychological androgyny, are reported. The results indicate that the Singapore Androgyny Inventory (SAI) demonstrated good internal consistency and temporal stability. M and F scales were unidimensional and orthogonal with composite items reflecting instrumental and expressive orientations. Masculinity was associated with need for achievement (r = .56), and femininity related to need for affiliation (r = .24). In addition, a 2 (gender) × 2 (M) × 2 (F) analysis of variance revealed main effects for both masculinity and femininity on personal and social self-concept, but no significant interaction effects. The same analysis demonstrated main effects only for masculinity on psychological well-being and self-acceptance. Taken together, evidence supported a differentiated additive model rather than a masculine or interactive model of androgyny, self-concept, and mental health. The advantages of cross-cultural extensions in psychological androgyny research are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Ang, P.-H.R.(1994).The impact of domain specific locus of control on different life domains.Unpublished honors thesis, National University of Singapore.

  • Ang, R., & Ward, C.(1994).Across-cultural perspective on models of psychological androgyny.Journal of Social Psychology, 134, 391–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballard-Reisch, D., & Elton, M.(1992).Gender orientation and the Bem Sex Role Inventory: A psychological construct revisited.Sex Roles, 27, 291–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S.L.(1974).The measurement of psychological androgyny.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S.L.(1975).Sex role adaptability: One consequence of psychological androgyny.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 634–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S.L.(1977).On the utility of alternate procedures for assessing psychological androgyny.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 196–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S.L.(1979).Theory and measurement of androgyny:Areply to Pedhazur-Tetenbaum and Locksley-Colten critiques.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1047–1054.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S.L.(1981).Bem Sex Role Inventory professional manual.Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S.L., & Lenney, E.(1976).Sex typing and avoidance of cross-sex behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 48–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackman, S.(1982).Comments on three methods of scoring androgyny as a continuous variable.Psychological Reports, 51, 1100–1102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryan, L., Coleman, M., & Ganong, L.(1981).Geometric mean as a continuous measure of androgyny.Psychological Reports, 48, 691–694.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, T., Gillaspy, J.A., & Thompson, B.(1997).The factor structure of the Bem Sex Role Inventory: Confirmatory analysis of long and short forms.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 118–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheong, C., Chow, C.-Y., Chua, G., Mohammed Dawood, K., Kwek, A., Loh, J., & Woo, M.-L.(1986).Psychological adjustment of married and unmarried graduates.Unpublished manuscript, National University of Singapore.

  • Chung, B.(1996).The construct validity of the Bem Sex Role Inventory for heterosexual and gay men.Journal of Homosexuality, 30, 87–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clammer, J.(1982).The institutionalization of ethnicity: The culture of ethnicity in Singapore.Ethnic and Racial Studies, 5, 127–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, E.P.(1985).Psychological androgyny.New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, E.P.(1987).Psychological androgyny: A review of the research.The Counseling Psychologist, 15, 471–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, C.J., & Gilbert, L.A.(1976).Sex role stereotypes: Effect on perceptions of self and others and on personal adjustment.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 23, 373–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdwins, C., Small, A., & Gross, R.(1980).The relationship of sex role to self-concept.Journal of Clinical Psychology, 36, 111–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitts, W.(1965).Tennessee Self-Concept manual.Nashville: Counselor Recordings and Tests.

  • Flaherty, J.F., & Dusek, J.B.(1980).An investigation of the relationship between psychological androgyny and components of self-concept.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 984–992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, L.J., & Wilcox, C.(1998).The relationship between Eysenck's personality dimensions and Bem's masculinity and femininity scales revisited.Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 683–687.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaudreau, P.(1977).Factor analysis and the Bem Sex Role Inventory.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 299–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, H.G.(1956).California Psychological Inventory manual.Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J.A., & Taylor, M.C.(1985).Psychological androgyny and the masculinity £ femininity interaction.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 429–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, C.L., & Ellis, J.B.(1998).Assessing the current validity of the Bem Sex Role Inventory.Sex Roles, 39, 929–941.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalin, R.(1979).Method for scoring androgyny as a continuous variable.Psychological Reports, 44, 1205–1206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J.A., Furman, W., & Young, V.(1978).Problems associated with the typological measurement of sex roles and androgyny.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 1574–1576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimlicka, T., Cross, H., & Tarnai, J.(1983).A comparison of androgynous, feminine, masculine and undifferentiated women on self-esteem, body satisfaction and sexual satisfaction.Psychology of Women Quarterly, 7, 291–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, E.C.Y.(1979).Measuring communicativity in multilingual societies: The cases of Singapore andWest Malaysia.Anthropological Linguistics, 21, 328–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, E.C.Y.(1985).Language identity: The case of Chinese in Singapore.In W. Tseng & D. Wu (Eds.), Chinese culture and mental health (pp.181–192) New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, A.-E.(1995).Meanings of multiethnicity: A case study of ethnicity and ethnic relations in Singapore.Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamke, L.K.(1982).The impact of sex-role orientation on self-esteem in early adolescence.Child Development, 53, 1530–1535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A.G., & Scheurer, V.L.(1983).Psychological androgyny and aspects of self-image in women and men.Sex Roles, 9, 289–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzo-Cioldi, F.(1996).Psychological androgyny: A concept in search of lesser substance.Journal for Theory of Social Behavior, 26, 137–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubinski, D., Tellegen, A., & Butcher, J.N.(1983).Masculinity, femininity and androgyny viewed and assessed as distinct concepts.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 428–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundy, A., & Rosenberg, J.A.(1987).Androgyny, masculinity and self-esteem.Social Behavior and Personality, 15, 91–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markstrom-Adams, C.(1989).Androgyny and its relationship to adolescent psychosocial wellbeing: A review of the literature.Sex Roles, 21, 325–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H.W.(1987).Masculinity, femininity and androgyny: Their relations with multiple dimensions of self-concept.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 22, 91–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H.W., & Byrne, B.(1991).Differentiated additive androgyny model: Relations between masculinity, femininity, and multiple dimensions of self-concept.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 811–828.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H.W., & Myers, M.R.(1986).Masculinity, femininity and androgyny:Amethodological and theoretical critique.Sex Roles, 14, 397–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian, A.(1970).The development and validation of measures of affiliative tendency and sensitivity to rejection.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 417–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian, A., & Bank, L.(1978).Aquestionnaire measure of individual differences in achieving tendency.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38, 475–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreland, J., Gulanick, N., Montague, E., & Harren, V.(1978).Some psychometric properties of the Bem Sex Role Inventory.Applied Psychological Measurement, 2, 249–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Heron, C.A., & Orlofsy, J.L.(1990).Stereotypic and nonstereotypic sex role trait and behavior orientations, gender identity and psychological adjustment.Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 58, 134–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedhazur, E.J., & Tetenbaum, T.J.(1979).The Bem Sex-Role Inventory: A theoretical and methodological critique.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 996–1016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramanaiah, N.V., & Martin, H.J.(1984).Convergent and discriminant validity of selected masculinity and femininity scales.Sex Roles, 10, 493–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruch, L.O.(1984).Dimensionality of the Bem Sex Role Inventory: A multi-dimensional analysis.Sex Roles, 10, 99–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shifren, K., & Bauserman, E.(1996).The relationship between instrumental and expressive traits, health behaviors and perceived physical health.Sex Roles, 34, 841–864.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvern, L.E., & Ryan, V.L.(1979).Self-rated adjustment and sex-typing on the Bem Sex Role Inventory: Is masculinity the primary predictor of adjustment? Sex Roles, 5, 739–763.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J.T.(1984).Masculinity, femininity and gender related traits:Aconceptual analysis and critique of current research.InB.A. Maher & W.B. Maher (Eds.), Progress in experimental personality research (Vol.13), (pp.1–97).New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J.T., & Helmreich, R.(1972).The Attitudes toward Women Scale: An objective instrument to measure the rights and roles of women in contemporary society.Journal Supplement Abstract Service, 2, 66–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J.T., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J.(1974).The Personal Attributes Questionnaire: A measure of sex role stereotypes and masculinity-femininity.Journal Supplement Abstract Service, 4, 43–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J.T., Helmreich, R.L., & Stapp, J.(1975).Ratings of self and peers on sex role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strahan, R.F.(1975).Remarks on Bem's measurement of psychological androgyny: Alternative methods and a supplementary analysis.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 568–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strahan, R.F.(1981).Some remarks on scoring androgyny as a continuous variable.Psychological Reports, 49, 887–890.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M.C., & Hall, J.A.(1982).Psychological androgyny: A review and reformulation of theories, methods and conclusions.Psychological Bulletin, 92, 347–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, B.(1989).Meta-analysis of factor structure studies: A case example with Bem's androgyny measure.Journal of Experimental Education, 57, 187–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vacha-Haase, T.(1998).Reliability generalization: Exploring variance in measurement error affecting score reliability across studies.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 6–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, C.(1985).Attitudes toward male-female relationships and rape justification beliefs in Singapore.In I. Reyes-Lagunes & Y. Poortinga (Eds.), From a different perspective: Studies of behavior across cultures (pp.175–195). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, C.(1988).The Attitudes toward Rape Victims Scale: Construction, validation and crosscultural applicability.Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12, 127–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, C.(1990).Gender stereotyping in Singaporean children.International Journal of Behavioral Development, 13, 309–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, C., & Hewstone, M.(1985).Ethnicity, language and intergroup relations in Singapore: A social psychological analysis.Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 6, 271–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, C., & Sethi, R.R.(1986).Cross-cultural validation of the Bem Sex Role Inventory: Malaysian and South Indian research.Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 17, 300–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, C., Waters, L., & Pincus, S.(1977).Factor analysis of masculine and feminine sex typedtraits from the Bem Sex-Role Inventory.Psychological Reports, 40, 567–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, B.E.(1983).Sex role orientation and self-esteem: A critical meta-analytical review.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 765–778.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D., & D'Alessandro, J.D.(1994).A comparison of three measures of androgyny and their relationship to psychological adjustment.Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 9, 469–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J.E., & Best, D.L.(1990a).Measuring sex stereotypes—A multinational study (Rev.ed.).Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J.E., & Best, D.L.(1990b).Sex and psyche: Gender and self viewed cross-culturally.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J.E., Best, D.L., Ward, C., & Neto, F.(1989).Sex stereotypes in Portugal and Singapore.In D.M. Keats, D. Munro, & L. Mann (Eds.), Heterogeneity in cross-cultural psychology (pp.520–528).Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, F.R., & Cook, E.P.(1984).Construct validity of four androgyny instruments.Sex Roles, 11, 813–837.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarnold, P.R.(1990).Androgyny and sex-typing as continuous independent factors and a glimpse of the future.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 407–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeldow, P.B., Clark, D., & Daugherty, S.R.(1985).Masculinity, femininity, typeAbehavior, and psychosocial adjustment in medical students.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 481–492.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand

    Colleen A. Ward

Authors
  1. Colleen A. Ward
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ward, C.A. Models and Measurements of Psychological Androgyny: A Cross-Cultural Extension of Theory and Research. Sex Roles 43, 529–552 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007171500798

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007171500798

Keywords

Search

Navigation