Sex Roles

, Volume 43, Issue 9–10, pp 645–664 | Cite as

The Effects of Viewing R-rated Movie Scenes That Objectify Women on Perceptions of Date Rape

  • Michael A. Milburn
  • Roxanne Mather
  • Sheree D. Conrad


The contribution of sexualized images of women in the media to rape and beliefs that support rape has been the subject of considerable research. The present study tested the effects of viewing scenes from R-rated popular films on perceptions of female responsibility for and enjoyment of either a date rape or a stranger rape, using a sample of participants that was both ethnically and socioeconomically diverse. Participants viewed either nonviolent scenes that objectified and degraded women sexually or scenes from an animation festival. In a supposedly unrelated second experiment, participants then read a fictitious magazine account of a date rape or a stranger rape. Results indicated a significant three-way interaction among gender, video condition, and rape scenario on perceptions of the rape, such that males who viewed the sexually objectifying video felt that the victim in the date-rape condition experienced pleasure and “got what she wanted.”


Social Psychology Considerable Research Video Condition Female Responsibility Experienced Pleasure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abbey, A. (1982). Sex differences in attributes for friendly behavior: Do males misperceive females’ friendliness? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 830–838.Google Scholar
  2. Baron, R. A., & Bell, P. A. (1977). Sexual arousal and aggression by males: Effects of type of erotic stimuli and prior provocation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 79–87.Google Scholar
  3. Baron, L., & Strauss, M. A. (1984). Sexual stratification, pornography and rape in the U.S. In N. Malamuth & E. Donnerstein (Eds.), Pornography and sexual aggression. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bell, S. T., Kuriloff, P. J., & Lottes, I. (1994). Understanding attributions of blame in stranger rape and date rape situations: An examination of gender, race, identification, and students’ social perceptions of rape victims. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1719–1734.Google Scholar
  5. Bridges, J. S. (1991). Perceptions of date and stranger rape:Adifference in sex role expectations and rape-supportive beliefs. Sex Roles, 24, 291–307.Google Scholar
  6. Bridges, J. S., & McGrail, C. A. (1989). Attributions of responsibility for date and stranger rape. Sex Roles, 21, 273–286.Google Scholar
  7. Brownmiller, S. (1975). Against our will. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  8. Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217–230.Google Scholar
  9. Check, J. V. P., & Guloien, T. H. (1989). Reported proclivity for coercive sex following repeated exposure to sexually violent pornography, nonviolent dehumanizing pornography and erotica. In D. Zillmann & J. Bryant (Eds.), Pornography: Research advances and policy considerations (pp. 159–184). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Check, J. V. P., & Malamuth, N. M. (1983). Sex role stereotyping and reactions to depictions of stranger vs. acquaintance rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 344–356.Google Scholar
  11. Donnerstein, E., Linz, D., & Penrod, S. (1987). The question of pornography: Research findings and policy implications. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  12. Griffin, S. (1986). Rape: The politics of consciousness (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  13. Hamilton, D. L., & Zanna, M. P. (1974). Context effects in impression formation: Changes in connotative meaning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 649–654.Google Scholar
  14. Hansen, C. H., & Hansen, R. D. (1988). How rock music videos can change what is seen when boy meets girl: Priming stereotypic appraisal of social interactions. Sex Roles, 19, 287–316.Google Scholar
  15. Jackson, S. (1995). The social context of rape: Sexual scripts and motivation. In P. Searles & R. J. Berger (Eds.), Rape and society, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  16. Jansma, L. L., Linz, D. G., Mulac, A., & Imrich, D. J. (1997). Men's interactions with women after viewing sexually explicit films: Does degradation make a difference? Communication Monographs, 64, 1–24.Google Scholar
  17. Koss, M. P. (1985). The hidden rape victim: Personality, attitudinal, and situational characteristics. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9, 193–212.Google Scholar
  18. Koss, M. P., Leonard, K. E., Beezley, D. A., & Oros, C. J. (1985). Non-stranger sexual aggression: A discriminant analysis of the psychological characteristics of undetected offenders. Sex Roles, 12, 981–992.Google Scholar
  19. Lebowitz, L., & Roth, S. (1994). ”I felt like a slut”: The cultural context and women's response to being raped. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 7, 363–390.Google Scholar
  20. Linz, D., Donnerstein, E., & Adams, S.M. (1989). Psychological desensitization and judgments about female victims of violence. Human Communication Research, 15, 509–522.Google Scholar
  21. Linz, D., Donnerstein, E., & Penrod, S. (1988). Effects of long-term exposure to violent and sexually degrading depictions of women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 758–768.Google Scholar
  22. Longino, H. E. (1980). Pornography, oppression and freedom: A closer look. In L. Lederer (Ed.), Take back the night. New York: William Morrow and Co.Google Scholar
  23. MacKinnon, C. A. (1992). Francis Biddle's sister: Pornography, civil rights, and speech. In T. L Whitehead & B. V. Reid (Eds.), Gender constructs and social issues (pp. 261–321). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  24. Malamuth, N. M. (1981). Rape proclivity among males. Journal of Social Issues, 37, 138–157.Google Scholar
  25. Marshall, W. L. (1988). The use of sexually explicit stimuli by rapists, child molesters, and non offenders. Journal of Sex Research, 25, 267–288.Google Scholar
  26. McKenzie-Mohr, D., & Zanna, M. P. (1990). Treating women as sexual objects: Look to the (gender schematic) male who has viewed pornography. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 296–308.Google Scholar
  27. Russell, D. E. H. (1984). Sexual exploitation: Rape, child sexual abuse, and workplace harassment. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  29. Taylor, S. E., & Crocker, J. (1981). Schematic bases of social information processing. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, & M. P Zanna (Eds.), Social cognition: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 1). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  30. Warshaw, R. (1988). I never called it rape: The”Ms.” report on recognizing, fighting, and surviving date and acquaintance rape. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  31. Weaver, J. B. (1987). Effects of portrayals of female sexuality and violence against women on perceptions of women. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Communication, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.Google Scholar
  32. Willis, C. (1992). The effect of sex role stereotype, victim and defendant race, and prior relationship on rape culpability attributions. Sex Roles, 26, 213–226.Google Scholar
  33. Zillmann, D., & Bryant, J. (1982). Pornography, sexual callousness, and the trivialization of rape. Journal of Communication, Autumn, 10–21.Google Scholar
  34. Zillmann, D., & Bryant, J. (1986). Shifting preferences in pornography consumption. Communication Research, 13, 560–578.Google Scholar
  35. Zillmann, D., and Weaver, J. B. (1989). Pornography and men's sexual callousness toward women. In D. Zillmann & J. Bryant (Eds.), Pornography: Research advances and policy considerations (pp. 95–125). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael A. Milburn
    • 1
  • Roxanne Mather
    • 1
  • Sheree D. Conrad
    • 1
  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentUniversity of Massachusetts/Boston

Personalised recommendations