Skip to main content
Log in

The prospects of an adjustment policy based on collective learning in old industrial regions

  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper aims to discuss the possibilities of adopting a policy based on collective learning in old industrial regions. This is particularly interesting because old industrial regions are believed to have lost their learning capabilities, as indicated by notions of `technological' and `institutional' lock-in. Moreover, the success stories where positive effects of interactive learning have been observed (Silicon Valley, Baden-Württemberg) all share the lack of an industrial past.

First, we specify how a theoretical framework based on interactive learning, which tries to explain the industrial decline of old agglomerations, may look like, and how such an approach differs from other approaches. Then, we set out a policy framework that aims to deal with the process of structural adjustment and which incorporates the ideas of interactive learning based on socio-cultural factors. In this respect, we distinguish between two possible routes of adjustment, which reveal a complex interplay between different types of agglomeration economies, innovations and restructuring processes. Finally, we devote attention to the problems such a policy based on the notion of the learning region may face, such as the problem of how to overcome a negative lock-in situation caused by localized path dependency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ache P., 1998: Lokale Innovative Milieus in Altindustriellen Regionen. Theoretische Konzepte und Empirische Befunde, PhD Thesis, University of Dortmund, Dortmund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin A. and Thrift N. (eds.), 1994: Globalization, Institutions and Regional Development in Europe. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur B., 1994: Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asheim B. T., 1997: 'Learning regions’ in a globalised world economy: towards a new competitive advantage of industrial districts? In: Taylor M. and Conti S. (eds), Interdependent and Uneven Development. Global-local Perspectives. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp. 143-176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boschma R. A., 1997: New industries and windows of locational opportunity. A long-term analysis of Belgium. Erdkunde 51: 1-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boschma R. A. and G. A. van der Knaap, 1997: New technology and windows of locational opportunity: indeterminacy, creativity and chance. In Reynders J. (ed.), Economics and Evolution. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 171-202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boschma R. A. and J.G. Lambooy 1999: Evolutionary economics and economic geography. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 9: 411-29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boschma R.A. and Schobben R.J.P. (eds) (forthcoming): Europe and the regions. The issue of governance. Special issue of Regional and Federal Studies.

  • Camagni R. (ed.), 1991: Innovation Networks: Spatial Perspectives. Belhaven Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells M. and P. Hall, 1994: Technopoles of the World. The Making of the Twenty-first-century Industrial Complexes. Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman K. and D. F. Walker 1991: Industrial Location. Principles and Policies, 2nd edn., Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm M., 1990: Regions in Recession and Resurgence. Unwin Hyman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke P. and Morgan K., 1998: The Associational Economy. Firms, Regions and Innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunat F. and Thomas B., 1997: Globalisation and territorial economy: what future for the north of France as an old industrial area? In: Taylor M. and Conti S. (eds), Interdependent and Uneven Development. Global-local Perspectives. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp. 177-194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabher G., 1993: The weakness of strong ties. The lock-in of regional development in the Ruhr area, In: Grabher G., (ed.), The Embedded Firm. On the Socio-economics of Industrial Networks. Routledge, London, pp. 255-277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregersen B. and Johnson B., 1997: Learning economies, innovation systems and European integration. Regional Studies 31, 479-490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison B., 1992: Industrial districts: old wine in new bottles. Regional Studies 26, 469-483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassink R., 1997: What distinguishes ‘good’ from ‘bad’ industrial agglomerations? Erdkunde 51: 2-11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassink R. 1998: What does the learning region mean for economic geography? Paper presented at RSA conference, Frankfurt, September 20–23, pp. 18.

  • Heinze R.G., Hilbert J., Nordhause-Janz J. and Rehfeld D., 1998: Industrial clusters and the governance of change. Lessons from North Rhine-Westphalia. In: Braczyck H. J., Cooke P. and Heidenreich M. (eds), Regional Innovation Systems. The Role of Governance in a Globalized World. London, pp. 263-283.

  • Herrigel G. B., 1990: Industrial Organization and the Politics of Industry: Centralized and Decentralized Production in Germany, PhD Thesis MIT, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst P. and Zeitlin J. (eds), 1989: Reversing Industrial Decline? Industrial Structure and Policy in Britain and her Competitors. Berg, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson R., 1994: Institutional change, cultural transformation, and economic regeneration. Myths and realities from Europe's old industrial areas. In: Amin A. and Thrift N. (eds), Globalization, Institutions and Regional Development in Europe, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 196-216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson R., 1999: The learning economy, the learning firm and the learning region. A sympathetic critique of the limits of learning. European Urban and Regional Studies, 6: 59-72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson R., Dunford M., Hamilton D. and Kotter R., 1997: Developing regional strategies for economic success. Lessons from Europe's economically successful regions? European Urban and Regional Studies 4: 365-73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs J., 1968: The Economy of Cities. Weidenfeld, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs J., 1984: Cities and the Wealth of Nations. Penguin Books, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann A. and F. Tödtling, 2000: Systems of innovation in traditional industrial regions: the case of Styria in a comparative perspective. Regional Studies 34: 29-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman P., 1993: The lessons of Massachusetts for EMU. In: Torres F. and Giavazzi F. (eds), Adjustment and Growth in the European Monetary Union. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 241-269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambooy J. G., 1986: Locational decisions and regional structure. In: Paelinck J.H.P. (ed.), Human Behaviour in Geographical Space. Gower, London, pp. 149-165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambooy J.G., 1998: Agglomeratievoordelen en Ruimtelijke Ontwikkeling: Steden in het Tijdperk van de Kenniseconomie. Oratie Universiteit Utrecht, Universiteit Utrecht, Utrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambooy J. G. and Boschma R. A., 2000: Evolutionary economics and regional policy. The Annals of Regional Science (in press).

  • Lampard E. E. 1955: Histories of cities in the economically advanced areas. Economic Development & Cultural Change 3: 99-117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malecki E. J., 1991: Technology and Economic Development. Longman, Harlow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malmberg A. and P. Maskell, 1997: Towards an explanation of regional specialization and industry agglomeration. European Planning Studies 5: 25-41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markusen A., 1985: Profit Cycles, Oligopoly and Regional Development. MacMillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin R. and Rowthorn B. (eds), 1986: The Geography of Deindustrialisation. MacMillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin R. and Sunley P., 1996: Paul Krugman's geographical economics and its implications for regional development theory: a critical assessment. Economic Geography 72: 259-292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maskell P. and Malmberg A., 1995: Localised Learning and Industrial Competitiveness. Berkeley Roundtable of International Economy Working Paper No. 80, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan K., 1997: The learning region: institutions, innovation and regional renewal. Regional Studies 31: 491-503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, R.. D., 1979: City Life Cycles and American Urban Policy. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez C. and Soete L., 1988: Catching up in technology: entry barriers and windows of opportunity. In: Dosi G. et al. (eds), Technical Change and Economic Theory. Pinter Publishers, London, pp. 458-479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees J., 1979: Technological change and regional shifts in American manufacturing. Professional Geographer 31: 45-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson H. W. 1973: The Economics of Urban Size. Saxon House, Westmead.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodwin L. and Sazanami H., (eds), 1989: Deindustrialization and Regional Economic Transformation. The Experience of the United States. Unwin Hyman, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian A., 1994: Regional Networks: Industrial Adaptation in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Mass).

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian A., 2000: Regional networks and innovation in Silicon Valley and Route 128. In: Acs (ed.), Regional Innovation, Knowledge and Global Change. Pinter Publishers, London, pp. 123-138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott A. J., 1988: New Industrial Spaces: Flexible Production Organization and Regional Development in North America and Europe. Pion, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott A. J., 1993: Technopolis. High Technology Industry and Regional Development in Southern California. University of California Press, Berkely.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro C. and Varian H.R., 1999: Information Rules. A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy, Harvard University Press, Harvard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner M., 1985: Old industrial areas: a theoretical approach. Urban Studies 22: 387-398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storper M., 1992: The limits to globalization; technology districts and industrial growth. Economic Geography 68: 60-93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storper M., 1995: Regional technology coalitions. An essential dimension of national technology policy. Research Policy 24: 895-911.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storper M., 1997: The Regional World: Territorial Development in a Global Economy. Guilford Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storper M. and R. Walker, 1989: The Capitalist Imperative: Territory, Technology and Industrial Growth. Basil Blackwell, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swann P., Prevezer M. and Stout D., (eds), 1998: The Dynamics of Industrial Clustering. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon R., 1966: International investment and international trade in the product cycle. Quarterly Journal of Economics 80, pp. 190-207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warsh D., 1984: The Idea of Economic Complexity. Viking Penguin Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boschma, R., Lambooy, J. The prospects of an adjustment policy based on collective learning in old industrial regions. GeoJournal 49, 391–399 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007144414006

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007144414006

Navigation