Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 43, Issue 7–8, pp 499–528 | Cite as

Masculinity and Femininity in Contemporary American Society: A Reevaluation Using the Bem Sex-Role Inventory

  • Carol J. Auster
  • Susan C. Ohm
Article

Keywords

Social Psychology Contemporary American Society 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Ballard-Reisch, B., & Elton, M.(1992).Gender orientation and the Bem Sex Role Inventory: A psychological construct revisited.Sex Roles, 27, 291–306.Google Scholar
  2. Bem, S.(1974).The measurement of psychological androgyny.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.Google Scholar
  3. Bem, S.(1975).Sex role adaptability: One consequence of psychological androgyny.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 634–643.Google Scholar
  4. Bem, S.(1981).Bem Sex-Role Inventory: Professional Manual.Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc.Google Scholar
  5. Blanchard-Fields, F., Suhrer-Roussel, L., & Hertzog, C.(1994).A confirmatory factor analysis of the Bem Sex Role Inventory: Old questions, new answers.Sex Roles, 30, 423–457.Google Scholar
  6. Campbell, T., Gillaspy, J., & Thompson, B.(1997).The factor structure of the Bem Sex-Role Inventory (BSRI): Confirmatory analysis of long and short forms.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 118–124.Google Scholar
  7. Constantinople, A.(1973).Masculinity-femininity: An exception to a famous dictum.Psychological Bulletin, 80, 389–407.Google Scholar
  8. Eller, J., & Dodder, R.(1989).Relationships between gender and gender-neutral characteristics in three societies.The Journal of Social Psychology, 129, 561–563.Google Scholar
  9. Faulkender, P.(1987).Validity of using Bem Sex-Role Inventory norms on other samples: Analysis of southern sample.Psychological Reports, 60, 399–406.Google Scholar
  10. Gill, S., Stockard, J., Johnson, M., & Williams, S.(1987).Measuring gender differences: The expressive dimension and critique of androgyny scales.Sex Roles, 17, 375–400.Google Scholar
  11. Gurman, E., & Long, K.(1992).Gender orientation and emergent leader behavior.Sex Roles, 27, 391–400.Google Scholar
  12. Harris, A.(1994).Ethnicity as a determinant of sex role identity: A replication study of item selection for the Bem Sex Role Inventory.Sex Roles, 31, 241–273.Google Scholar
  13. Holt, C., & Ellis, J.(1998).Assessing the current validity of the Bem Sex-Role Inventory.Sex Roles, 39, 929–941.Google Scholar
  14. Lara-Cantu, M., & Suzan-Reed, M.(1988).How valid is the social desirability scale of Bem's sex role inventory? Psychological Reports, 62, 553–554.Google Scholar
  15. Levine, J., & Pittinsky, T.(1997).Working fathers: New strategies for balancing work and family.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  16. Marsh, H., & Myers, M.(1986).Masculinity, femininity, and androgyny: A methodological and theoretical critique.Sex Roles, 14, 397–430.Google Scholar
  17. Martin, H., & Ramanaiah, N.(1988).Confirmatory factor analysis of the Bem Sex-Role Inventory.Psychological Reports, 62, 343–350.Google Scholar
  18. Pedhazur, E., & Tetenbaum, T.(1979).Bem Sex Role Inventory: A theoretical and methodological critique.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 996–1016.Google Scholar
  19. Risman, B., & Johnson-Sumerford, D.(1998).Doing it fairly: A study of postgender marriages.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 23–40.Google Scholar
  20. Schmitt, B., & Millard, R.(1988).Construct validity of the Bem Sex Role Inventory (BSRI): Does the BSRI distinguish between gender-schematic and gender-aschematic individuals? Sex Roles, 19, 581–588.Google Scholar
  21. Smith, C., Noll, J., & Bryant, J.(1999).The effect of social context on gender self-concept. Sex Roles, 40, 499–512.Google Scholar
  22. Spence, J., & Helmreich, R.(1980).Masculine instrumentality and feminine expressiveness: Their relationships with sex role attitudes and behaviors.Psychology ofWomen Quarterly, 5, 147–163.Google Scholar
  23. Street, S., Kimmel, E., & Kromrey, J.(1995).Revisiting university student gender role perceptions.Sex Roles, 33, 183–201.Google Scholar
  24. Turner, B., & Turner, C.(1991).Bem Sex-Role Inventory stereotypes for men and women varying in age and race among National Register psychologists.Psychological Reports, 69, 931–944.Google Scholar
  25. Twenge, J.(1997).Changes in masculine and feminine traits over time: A meta-analysis.Sex Roles, 36, 305–325.Google Scholar
  26. Uleman, J., & Weston, M.(1986).Does the BSRI inventory sex roles? Sex Roles, 15, 43–62.Google Scholar
  27. U.S.Bureau of the Census (1999).Statistical Abstract of the United States: 1999 (119th edition).Washington, D.C.: U.S.Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  28. Wakefield, J., Sasek, J., Friedman, A., & Bowden, J.(1976).Androgyny and other measures of masculinity-femininity.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 44, 766–770.Google Scholar
  29. Waters, C., Waters, L., & Pincus, S.(1977).Factor analysis of masculine and feminine sex-typed items from the Bem Sex Role Inventory.Psychological Reports, 40, 567–570.Google Scholar
  30. Wilson, F., & Cook, E.(1984).Concurrent validity of four androgyny instruments.Sex Roles, 11, 813–837.Google Scholar
  31. Wong, F., McCreary, D., & Duffy, K.(1990).Afurther validation of the Bem Sex Role Inventory: A multitrait-multi-method study.Sex Roles, 22, 249–259.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carol J. Auster
    • 1
  • Susan C. Ohm
    • 2
  1. 1.Franklin and Marshall CollegeUSA
  2. 2.Franklin and Marshall CollegeUSA

Personalised recommendations