Skip to main content
Log in

The Importance of Pilot Studies: Beginning the Hermeneutic Circle

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article suggests the importance of experiential knowledge and/or engagement of the researcher for developing understanding. One way to ground researchers' theoretical derived understanding is to conduct a pilot study. The hermeneutic circle, as described by Heidegger, provides a framework for understanding the importance of pilot studies; it suggests that a person must have a practical sense of the domain within which a phenomenon is situated in order to develop understanding. In this article, I present the many meaningful revisions to the theoretical framework and methodology that a pilot study allowed me to make within the research project. Two important implications that contribute to higher education research and practice are offered: (1) it illustrates the importance of grounding the research process in practical activity, and (2) it highlights how reflection can help to improve our research practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Alcoff, L. (1987). Cultural feminism versus post-structuralism: The identity crisis in feminist theory. Signs 13(3): 405–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amey, M., and Tombley, S. (1992). Re-visioning leadership in community colleges. The Review of Higher Education 15(2): 125–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin, H., and Leland, C. (1991). Women of Influence, Women of Vision. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bensimon, E. (1989). A feminist reinterpretation of presidents definitions of leadership. Peabody Journal of Education 66(3): 143–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bensimon, E., and Neumann, A. (1993). Redesigning Collegiate Leadership. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, R. (1992). How Academic Leadership Works. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolman, L., and Deal, T. (1984). Modern Approaches to Understanding and Managing Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D. (1986). Participatory research and community planning. In Barry Checkoway (ed.), Strategic Perspectives on Planning Practice, pp. 123–137. Lexington: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, C., Hayworth, J., and Millar, S. (1993). A positioned subject approach to inquiry. In Clifton Conrad, Anna Neumann and Patricia Scott (eds.). Qualitative Research In Higher Education: Experiencing Alternative Perspectives And Approaches, pp. 267–277. Needham, MA: Ginn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N., and Lincoln. Y. (eds.). (1994). Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. London: Collier-Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaventa, J. (1988). Participatory research in North America. Convergence 21(23): 19–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, Cyborgs, and Women. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. (1986). Introduction: Is there a feminist method? In Sandra Harding (ed.), Feminism and Methodology, pp. 1–15. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harstock, N. (1986). The feminist standpoint: developing the ground for a specifically feminist historical materialism. In Sandra Harding (ed.), Feminism and Methodology, pp. 157–180. Bloomington: Indiana University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and Time. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helgesen, S. (1990). Women's Way of Leading. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lather, P. (1986). Research as praxis. Harvard Educational Review 56(3): 257–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lather, P. (1991). Getting Smart: Feminist Research and Pedagogy With/In the Postmodern. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y., and Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. (1984). Emerging developments in the study of organizations. In R. Birnbaum (Ed.), ASHE reader on organization and governance in higher education (pp. 53–65). Needham Heights, MA: Ginn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischler, E. (1986). Research Interviewing: Context and Narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochs, E. (1979). Transcription as theory. In E. Ochs and B. Schieffelin (eds.), Developmental Pragmatics, pp. 43–72. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist Methods in Social Research. New York: Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. (1981). Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riessman, C. (1993). Narrative Analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosaldo, R. (1993). Culture and Truth. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosener, J. (1990, November/December). Ways women lead. Harvard Business Review, 119–125.

  • Shotter, J. (1993). Cultural Politics of Everyday Life. Toronto: University of Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spradley, J. (1979). The Ethnographic Interview. Florida: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, L. (1990). Feminist Praxis. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. (1995). Sense-making in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W. (1991). Participatory Action Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W., Greenwood, D., and Lazes, P. (1989). Participatory action research: through practice to science in social research. American Behavioral Scientist 32(5): 513–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G. (1989). Managerial leadership: a review of the theory and research. Journal of Management 15(2): 251–289.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kezar, A. The Importance of Pilot Studies: Beginning the Hermeneutic Circle. Research in Higher Education 41, 385–400 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007047028758

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007047028758

Keywords

Navigation