Skip to main content
Log in

Correlates of Perceived Gender Discrimination For Female Versus Male Medical Technologists

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study longitudinally investigated correlates of perceived gender discrimination in a female-dominated occupation, medical technology. The sample consisted of 303 female and 101 male medical technologists (MTs), of whom 97% had a baccalaureate degree and 3% possessed a graduate-level degree. Descriptive results showed, surprisingly that female MTs perceived higher gender discrimination than male MTs. Significant gender differences in perceived antecedent–gender discrimination correlations were found. Female MTs with lower perceived extrinsic job satisfaction and organizational support were more likely to perceive greater gender discrimination than male MTs. These results suggest that perceived gender discrimination extends beyond occupational groupings and is a more widely perceived phenomenon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Auster, E. (1989). Task characteristics as a bridge between macro-and microlevel research on salary inequality between men and women. Academy ofManagement Review, 14, 173–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, R., Horan, P., & Tolbert, C. (1978). Stratification in a dual economy: A sectoral model of earnings determination. American Sociological Review, 43, 704–720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beller, A. (1985). changes in the sex composition of U.S. occupations, 1960- 1981. Journal of Human Resources, 20, 235–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bielby, W., & Baron, J. (1986). Men and women at work: Sex segregation and statistical discrimination. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 759–799.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, G. (1999). Testing the longitudinal impact of work variables and performance appraisal satisfaction on subsequent overall job satisfaction. Human Relations, 52, 1099–1113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, G., & Ryan, J. (1997). On measuring work ethic: A neglected work commitment facet. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 51, 435–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, T., Fields, D., & Goodman, J. (1994). Organization-level determinants of women in management. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 241–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burtt, K. (1998). Male nurses still face bias. American Journal of Nursing, 98, 64–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, M. (1994, December 12). Female chauvinist pigs? Time, 144, 62–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1975). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, J., & Major, B. (1989). Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review, 96, 608–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, J., & McGraw, K. (1984). What's good for the goose is not good for the gander: Solo status as an obstacle for occupational achievement for males and females. American Behavioral Scientist, 27, 357–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, J., Voelkl, K., Testa, M., & Major, B. (1991). Social stigma: The affective consequences of attributional ambiguity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 218–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, F. (1982). Relative deprivation and working women. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darity, W., & Mason, P. (1998). Evidence on discrimination in employment: Codes of color, codes of gender. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(2), 63–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 500–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floge, L., & Merrill, D. (1986). Tokenism reconsidered: Male nurses and female doctors in a hospital setting. Social Forces, 64, 925–947.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A. (1990). The Protestant work ethic: The psychology of work related beliefs and behaviours. London: Rutledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gattiker, U., & Cohen, A. (1997). Gender-based wage differences: The effects of occupation and job segregation in Israel. Industrial Relations, 52, 507–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampton, M., & Heywood, J. (1993). Do workers accurately perceive gender wage discrimination? Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 47, 36–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmening, D., & Lunz, M. (1996). Increasing diversity in the workplace. Laboratory Medicine, 27, 25–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, M. (1983). Sex bias in work settings: The lack of fit model. B. Staw & L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 5, pp. 269–298). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M., & Barr, S. (1989). Managerial selection decision models: Examination of configural cue processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 53–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchmeyer, C. (1998). Determinants of managerial career success: Evidence and explanation of male/female differences. Journal of Management, 24, 673–692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobrynowicz, D., & Branscombe, N. (1997). Who considers themselves victims of discrimination? Individual difference predictors of perceived gender discrimination in women and men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 347–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konrad, A., & Cannings, K. (1997). The effects of gender role congruence and statistical discrimination on managerial advancement. Human Relations, 50, 1305–1328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konrad, A., Ritchie, J., Lieb, P., & Corrigall, L. (in press). Sex differences and similarities in job attribute preferences: A meta analysis. Psychological Bulletin.

  • Lee, C. (1985). Increasing performance appraisal effectiveness: Matching task types, appraisal process and rater training. Academy of Management Review, 10, 322–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobel, S., & St. Clair, L. (1992). Effects of family responsibilities, gender and career identity salience on performance outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 1057–1069.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowry, T. (1998, September 3). Another Wall Street firm faces sex harassment charges. USA Today, Section B, p. 1.

  • Lyness, K., & Judiesch, M. (1999). Are women more likely to be hired or promoted into management positions? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54, 158–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Major, B., & Konar, E. (1984). An investigation of sex differences in pay expectations and their possible causes. Academy of Management Journal, 27, 777–792.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNemar, Q. (1969). Psychological Statistics. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, C., & Spector, P. (1982). Causes of employee turnover: A test of the Mobley, Griffeth, Hand and Meglino model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 53–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mobley, W., Griffeth, R., Hand, H., & Meglino, B. (1979). Review and conceptual analysis of the employee turnover process. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 493–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, H. (1985). Job satisfaction and women's spheres of work. Sex Roles, 13, 663–678.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mottaz, C. (1986). Gender differences in work satisfaction, work-related rewards and values, and the determinants of work satisfaction, Human Relations, 39, 359–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragins, B., Townsend, B., & Mattis, M. (1998). Gender gap in the executive suite: CEOs and female executives report on breaking the glass ceiling. Academy ofManagement Executive, 12, 28–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, P. (1994). Missing data: A conceptual review for applied psychologists. Personnel Psychology, 47, 537–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudmann, S., Lunz, M., & Summers, S. (1995). Entry-level technologists report job preparedness. Laboratory Medicine, 26, 717–719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggiero, K., & Taylor, M. (1995). Coping with discrimination: How disadvantaged group members perceive the discrimination that confronts them. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 826–838.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rusbult, C., Farrell, D., Rogers, G., & Mainous, A. (1988). Impact of exchange variables on exit, voice, loyalty and neglect: An integrative model of responses to declining job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 599–627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snizek, W., & Neil, C. (1992). Job characteristics, gender stereotypes and perceived gender. Organization Studies, 13, 403–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. (1985). Measurement of human service staff satisfaction: Development of the Job Satisfaction Survey. American Journal of Community Psychology, 13, 693–713.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, E. (1978). Research methods in organizational behavior. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroh, L., Brett, J., & Reilly, A. (1992). All the right stuff: A comparison of female and male managers' career progression. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 251–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, D., Wright, S., Moghaddam, F., & Lalonde, R. (1990). The personal/group discrimination discrepancy: Perceiving my group, but not myself, to be a target of discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 254–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M., & Ilgen, D. (1981). Sex discrimination against women in initial placement decisions: A laboratory investigation. Academy of Management Journal, 24, 859–865.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tharenou, P., Latimer, S., & Conroy, D. (1994). How do you make it to the top? An examination of influences on women's and men's managerial advancement. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 899–931.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truman, G., & Baroudi, J. (1994). Gender differences in the information systems managerial ranks: An assessment of potential discriminatory practices. MIS Quarterly, 18, 129–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wharton, A. (1994). Women's and men's responses to sex-segregated work. In M. Stevenson (Ed.), Gender roles through the life span (Chapter 8). Muncie, IN: Ball State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wozencraft, A. (1999, February 26). About 900 women will join suit against Merrill Lynch. New York Times, Section C, p. 6.

  • Wright, P., Ferris, S., Hiller, J., & Kroll, M. (1995). Competitiveness through management of diversity: Effects on stock price valuation. Academy ofManagement Journal, 38, 272–287.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blau, G., Tatum, D. Correlates of Perceived Gender Discrimination For Female Versus Male Medical Technologists. Sex Roles 43, 105–118 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007043813257

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007043813257

Keywords

Navigation