Skip to main content

No Sissy Boys Here: A Content Analysis of the Representation of Masculinity in Elementary School Reading Textbooks

Sex Roles volume 42, pages 255–270 (2000)Cite this article

Abstract

In this study, we investigate the portrayal of gender characteristics in elementary school reading textbooks. Over the past 25 years, most of the research on textbooks has focused on female roles and characteristics. In this research, we focus particularly on how males are portrayed. Using an evaluative instrument based on the Bem Sex Role Inventory, we examine first, third, and fifth grade literature textbooks. In particular, we analyze traits pertaining to masculine and feminine stereotypes. Our results show that despite publisher's guidelines and Title IX, males are still primarily portrayed in a stereotypical light. Males are overwhelming shown to be aggressive, argumentative, and competitive.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

REFERENCES

  • Bem, S. (1981). Bem Sex Role Inventory professional manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britton, G. E., & Lumpkin, M. C. (1977). For sale: Subliminal bias in textbooks. Reading Teacher, 31, 40–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, P. (1996). Gendershock. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frasher, R. (1982). A feminist look at literature for children: Ten years later. In M. Sheridan (Ed.), Sex stereotypes and reading Washington, DC: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frasher, R., & Walker, A. (1972). Sex roles in early reading textbooks. Reading Teacher, 25, 741–749.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henshaw, A. (1992). Skippings for girls: Children's perceptions of gender roles and gender preferences. Educational Research, 34, 229–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitchcock, M., & Tompkins G. E. (1987). Basal readers: Are they still sexist? Reading Teacher, 41, 288–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, P. A. (1996). Raising feminists. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 323–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, L. (1974). Women in aprons: The female stereotype in children's readers. Elementary School Journal, 74, 253–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purcell, P., & Stewart, L. (1990). Dick and Jane in 1989. Sex Roles, 22, 177–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, L. (1981). The dynamics of sex and gender. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, L. (1983). Guidelines for evaluation of elementary textbooks. In L. Richardson & V. Taylor (Eds.), Feminist frontiers: Rethinking sex, gender, and society. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rupley, W., Garcia, J., & Longnion, B. (1981). Sex role portrayal in reading materials: Implications for the 1980's. Reading Teacher, 35, 786–790.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandler, B. (1977). Title IX: Antisexism's big legal stick. In Taking the sexism out of education. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schau, C., & Scott, K. (1984). Impact of gender characteristics of instructional materials: An integration of the research literature. Journal of Educational Psychology, 26, 183–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, M. C., & Hopkins, C. J. (1990). Metacognitive theory applied: Strategic reading instruction in the current generation of basal readers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Reading Conference, Miami, November 1990.

  • Schnell, T. R., & Sweeney, J. (1975). Sex role bias in basal readers. Elementary English, 52, 737–742.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, K. (1981). Whatever happened to Jane and Dick?: Sexism in texts reexamined. Peabody Journal of Education, 58, 135–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, B. (1993). Genderplay. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn-Roberson, C., Tompkins, G., Hitchcock, M., & Oldham, M. (1989). Sexism in basal readers: An analysis of male main characters. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 4, 62–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, L., & Rizo, D. (1974). Biased textbooks: Images of males and females in elementary school textbooks in five subject areas. Washington, DC: National Foundation for the Improvement of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt, S. D. (1996). Traditional or androgynous: An analysis to determine gender role orientation of basal readers. Child Study Journal, 26, 303–318.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Georgia, USA

    Lorraine Evans

  2. Augusta State University, USA

    Kimberly Davies

Authors
  1. Lorraine Evans
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kimberly Davies
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Evans, L., Davies, K. No Sissy Boys Here: A Content Analysis of the Representation of Masculinity in Elementary School Reading Textbooks. Sex Roles 42, 255–270 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007043323906

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007043323906

Keywords

  • Social Psychology
  • Content Analysis
  • Elementary School
  • Female Role
  • Gender Characteristic