Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 42, Issue 3–4, pp 255–270 | Cite as

No Sissy Boys Here: A Content Analysis of the Representation of Masculinity in Elementary School Reading Textbooks

  • Lorraine Evans
  • Kimberly Davies
Article

Abstract

In this study, we investigate the portrayal of gender characteristics in elementary school reading textbooks. Over the past 25 years, most of the research on textbooks has focused on female roles and characteristics. In this research, we focus particularly on how males are portrayed. Using an evaluative instrument based on the Bem Sex Role Inventory, we examine first, third, and fifth grade literature textbooks. In particular, we analyze traits pertaining to masculine and feminine stereotypes. Our results show that despite publisher's guidelines and Title IX, males are still primarily portrayed in a stereotypical light. Males are overwhelming shown to be aggressive, argumentative, and competitive.

Keywords

Social Psychology Content Analysis Elementary School Female Role Gender Characteristic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Bem, S. (1981). Bem Sex Role Inventory professional manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  2. Britton, G. E., & Lumpkin, M. C. (1977). For sale: Subliminal bias in textbooks. Reading Teacher, 31, 40–45.Google Scholar
  3. Burke, P. (1996). Gendershock. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  4. Frasher, R. (1982). A feminist look at literature for children: Ten years later. In M. Sheridan (Ed.), Sex stereotypes and reading Washington, DC: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
  5. Frasher, R., & Walker, A. (1972). Sex roles in early reading textbooks. Reading Teacher, 25, 741–749.Google Scholar
  6. Henshaw, A. (1992). Skippings for girls: Children's perceptions of gender roles and gender preferences. Educational Research, 34, 229–35.Google Scholar
  7. Hitchcock, M., & Tompkins G. E. (1987). Basal readers: Are they still sexist? Reading Teacher, 41, 288–292.Google Scholar
  8. Katz, P. A. (1996). Raising feminists. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 323–340.Google Scholar
  9. Oliver, L. (1974). Women in aprons: The female stereotype in children's readers. Elementary School Journal, 74, 253–259.Google Scholar
  10. Purcell, P., & Stewart, L. (1990). Dick and Jane in 1989. Sex Roles, 22, 177–185.Google Scholar
  11. Richardson, L. (1981). The dynamics of sex and gender. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  12. Richardson, L. (1983). Guidelines for evaluation of elementary textbooks. In L. Richardson & V. Taylor (Eds.), Feminist frontiers: Rethinking sex, gender, and society. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  13. Rupley, W., Garcia, J., & Longnion, B. (1981). Sex role portrayal in reading materials: Implications for the 1980's. Reading Teacher, 35, 786–790.Google Scholar
  14. Sandler, B. (1977). Title IX: Antisexism's big legal stick. In Taking the sexism out of education. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  15. Schau, C., & Scott, K. (1984). Impact of gender characteristics of instructional materials: An integration of the research literature. Journal of Educational Psychology, 26, 183–193.Google Scholar
  16. Schmitt, M. C., & Hopkins, C. J. (1990). Metacognitive theory applied: Strategic reading instruction in the current generation of basal readers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Reading Conference, Miami, November 1990.Google Scholar
  17. Schnell, T. R., & Sweeney, J. (1975). Sex role bias in basal readers. Elementary English, 52, 737–742.Google Scholar
  18. Scott, K. (1981). Whatever happened to Jane and Dick?: Sexism in texts reexamined. Peabody Journal of Education, 58, 135–140.Google Scholar
  19. Thorne, B. (1993). Genderplay. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Vaughn-Roberson, C., Tompkins, G., Hitchcock, M., & Oldham, M. (1989). Sexism in basal readers: An analysis of male main characters. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 4, 62–68.Google Scholar
  21. Weitzman, L., & Rizo, D. (1974). Biased textbooks: Images of males and females in elementary school textbooks in five subject areas. Washington, DC: National Foundation for the Improvement of Education.Google Scholar
  22. Witt, S. D. (1996). Traditional or androgynous: An analysis to determine gender role orientation of basal readers. Child Study Journal, 26, 303–318.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lorraine Evans
    • 1
  • Kimberly Davies
    • 2
  1. 1.University of GeorgiaUSA
  2. 2.Augusta State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations