Abstract
In this study, we investigate the portrayal of gender characteristics in elementary school reading textbooks. Over the past 25 years, most of the research on textbooks has focused on female roles and characteristics. In this research, we focus particularly on how males are portrayed. Using an evaluative instrument based on the Bem Sex Role Inventory, we examine first, third, and fifth grade literature textbooks. In particular, we analyze traits pertaining to masculine and feminine stereotypes. Our results show that despite publisher's guidelines and Title IX, males are still primarily portrayed in a stereotypical light. Males are overwhelming shown to be aggressive, argumentative, and competitive.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Bem, S. (1981). Bem Sex Role Inventory professional manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Britton, G. E., & Lumpkin, M. C. (1977). For sale: Subliminal bias in textbooks. Reading Teacher, 31, 40–45.
Burke, P. (1996). Gendershock. New York: Anchor Books.
Frasher, R. (1982). A feminist look at literature for children: Ten years later. In M. Sheridan (Ed.), Sex stereotypes and reading Washington, DC: International Reading Association.
Frasher, R., & Walker, A. (1972). Sex roles in early reading textbooks. Reading Teacher, 25, 741–749.
Henshaw, A. (1992). Skippings for girls: Children's perceptions of gender roles and gender preferences. Educational Research, 34, 229–35.
Hitchcock, M., & Tompkins G. E. (1987). Basal readers: Are they still sexist? Reading Teacher, 41, 288–292.
Katz, P. A. (1996). Raising feminists. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 323–340.
Oliver, L. (1974). Women in aprons: The female stereotype in children's readers. Elementary School Journal, 74, 253–259.
Purcell, P., & Stewart, L. (1990). Dick and Jane in 1989. Sex Roles, 22, 177–185.
Richardson, L. (1981). The dynamics of sex and gender. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Richardson, L. (1983). Guidelines for evaluation of elementary textbooks. In L. Richardson & V. Taylor (Eds.), Feminist frontiers: Rethinking sex, gender, and society. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Rupley, W., Garcia, J., & Longnion, B. (1981). Sex role portrayal in reading materials: Implications for the 1980's. Reading Teacher, 35, 786–790.
Sandler, B. (1977). Title IX: Antisexism's big legal stick. In Taking the sexism out of education. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Schau, C., & Scott, K. (1984). Impact of gender characteristics of instructional materials: An integration of the research literature. Journal of Educational Psychology, 26, 183–193.
Schmitt, M. C., & Hopkins, C. J. (1990). Metacognitive theory applied: Strategic reading instruction in the current generation of basal readers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Reading Conference, Miami, November 1990.
Schnell, T. R., & Sweeney, J. (1975). Sex role bias in basal readers. Elementary English, 52, 737–742.
Scott, K. (1981). Whatever happened to Jane and Dick?: Sexism in texts reexamined. Peabody Journal of Education, 58, 135–140.
Thorne, B. (1993). Genderplay. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Vaughn-Roberson, C., Tompkins, G., Hitchcock, M., & Oldham, M. (1989). Sexism in basal readers: An analysis of male main characters. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 4, 62–68.
Weitzman, L., & Rizo, D. (1974). Biased textbooks: Images of males and females in elementary school textbooks in five subject areas. Washington, DC: National Foundation for the Improvement of Education.
Witt, S. D. (1996). Traditional or androgynous: An analysis to determine gender role orientation of basal readers. Child Study Journal, 26, 303–318.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Evans, L., Davies, K. No Sissy Boys Here: A Content Analysis of the Representation of Masculinity in Elementary School Reading Textbooks. Sex Roles 42, 255–270 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007043323906
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007043323906