, Volume 47, Issue 3, pp 395–409 | Cite as

Grid-group cultural theory: an introduction

  • Virginie Mamadouh


This article offers an introduction to grid-group cultural theory (also known as grid-group analysis, Cultural Theory or theory of socio-cultural viability), an approach that has been developed over the past thirty years in the work of the British anthropologists Mary Douglas and Michael Thompson, the American political scientist Aaron Wildavsky, and many others. This assessment begins with a presentation of the main claims of the theory, distinguishing two characteristic breads of grid-group cultural theory, in the one it is conceived as a heuristic device, in the other it is seen as a full explanatory theory. This brief is followed by a discussion of the typology generated by the theory. This includes a presentation of the two dimensions of sociality it posits, the cultural map they produce, as well as the four (or five) cultural types derived from them and their designations. The article proceeds with a discussion of key issues including the incorporation of other typologies (such as the one developed to analyse myths of nature), the relations between cultures or rationalities and several methodological issues. Finally the article introduces the contributions to this special issue of the GeoJournal.

cultural bias cultural theory grid-group analysis grid-group cultural theory myths of nature theory of sociocultural viability 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bernstein B., 1971: Class, Codes and Control, volume 1, Theoretical Studies towards a Sociology of Language, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  2. Boholm Å., 1996: Risk perception and social anthropology: a critique of cultural theory. Ethnos 61(1–2): 64-84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boyle R.P. and Coughlin R.M., 1994: Conceptualizing and operationalizing cultural theory. In: Coyle D.J. and Ellis R.J. (eds), Politics, Policy and Culture. Westview, Boulder, pp. 191-218.Google Scholar
  4. Chai S.-Ki and Swedlow B. (eds), 1998: Culture and Social Theory: Aaron Wildavsky. Transaction, New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
  5. Coughlin R.M. and Lockhart C., 1998: Grid-group theory and political ideology, A consideration of their relative strengths and weakness for explaining the structure of mass belief systems, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 10(1): 33-58.Google Scholar
  6. Coyle D.J., 1994: The theory that would be king. In: Coyle D.J. and Ellis R. (eds), Politics, Policy and Culture. Westview, Boulder, pp. 219-239.Google Scholar
  7. Coyle D.J. and Ellis R.J., 1994: Introduction. In: Coyle D.J. and Ellis R.J. (eds), Politics, Policy and Culture. Westview, Boulder, pp. 1-14.Google Scholar
  8. Coyle D.J. and Ellis R.J. (eds), 1994: Politics, Policy and Culture. Westview, Boulder.Google Scholar
  9. Dake K., 1990: Technology on Trial: Orienting Dispositions Toward Environmental and Health Hazards. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  10. Dake K., 1991: Orienting dispositions in the perception of risk: an analysis of contemporary world views and cultural biases. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 22(1): 60-81.Google Scholar
  11. Dake K., 1992: Myths of nature: cultural and social construction of risk. Journal of Social Issues, 48(4): 21-37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dake K. and Thompson M., 1993: The meanings of sustainable development: household strategies for managing needs and resources. In: Wright S.D., Dietz T., Borden R., Young G. and Guagnanp G. (eds), Human Ecology: Crossing Boundaries. The Society for Human Ecology, Fort Collins, Colorado.Google Scholar
  13. Dake K. and Wildavsky A., 1991: Theories of risk perception: who fears what and why? In: Wildavsky A. (ed.), The Rise of Radical Egalitarianism, pp. 133-150.Google Scholar
  14. Davy B., 1997: Essential Injustice, When Legal Institutions Cannot Resolve Environmental and Land Use Disputes, Springer-Verlag, Wien.Google Scholar
  15. Douglas M., 1970: Natural Symbols, Explorations in Cosmology. Barrie & Rockliff, London.Google Scholar
  16. Douglas M., 1973: Natural Symbols, Explorations in Cosmology. First Vintage Books edition, Vintage Books, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Douglas M., 1975a: Implicit Meanings: Essays in Anthropology. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
  18. Douglas M., 1975b: In the nature of things, Inaugural Lecture given at University College, London, 1971. In: M. Douglas, Implicit Meanings, pp. 210-229.Google Scholar
  19. Douglas M., 1978: Cultural Bias. Royal Anthropological Institute Occasional Paper No. 35, Royal Anthropological Institute, London (reprinted in: M. Douglas, 1982a, In the Active Voice, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, pp. 183–254).Google Scholar
  20. Douglas M., 1982a: In the Active Voice. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
  21. Douglas M. (ed.), 1982b: Essays in the Sociology of Perception. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
  22. Douglas M., 1982c: Introduction to grid/group analysis. In: Douglas M. (ed.), Essays in the Sociology of Perception. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, pp. 1-8.Google Scholar
  23. Douglas M., 1985: Risk Acceptability according to the Social Sciences, Russell Sage Foundation, New York.Google Scholar
  24. Douglas M., 1986: How Institutions Think. Syracuse University Press, Syracuse NY.Google Scholar
  25. Douglas M., 1990: Risk as a forensic resource. Daedalus, 119(4): 1-16.Google Scholar
  26. Douglas M., 1992: Risk and Blame: Essays in Cultural Theory. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  27. Douglas M., 1992b: Governability: a question of culture. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 22(3): 463-481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Douglas M., 1993: In the Wilderness: the doctrine of defilement in the Book of Numbers, JSOT Press, Sheffield (Journal for the Study of the Old Testament. Supplement series, No. 158).Google Scholar
  29. Douglas M., 1996: Thought Styles: Critical Essays on Good Taste. Sage, London.Google Scholar
  30. Douglas M., 1997: The depolitisation of risk. In: Ellis R.J. and Thompson M. (eds), Culture Matters. Westview, Boulder, pp. 121-132.Google Scholar
  31. Douglas M. and Isherwood B., 1978: The World of Goods: Toward an Anthropology of Consumption. Penguin Books, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
  32. Douglas M. and Ney S., 1998: Missing Persons, A Critique of Personhood in the Social Sciences, University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  33. Douglas M. and Wildavsky A., 1982: Risk and Culture, An Essay on the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  34. Edvardsen U., 1997: A cultural approach to understanding modes of transition to democracy. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 9(1): 211-234.Google Scholar
  35. Ellis R.J., 1991: Explaining the occurrence of charismatic leadership in organizations. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 3(3): 305-320.Google Scholar
  36. Ellis R.J. and Thompson M. (eds), 1997: Culture Matters, Essays in Honor of Aaron Wildasky, Westview, Boulder.Google Scholar
  37. Ellis R.J. and Thompson F., 1997: Culture and the environment in the Pacific Northwest. American Political Science Review, 91(4): 885-897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ellis R.J. and Wildavsky A., 1989: Dilemmas of Presidential Leadership: From Washington to Lincoln, Transaction, New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
  39. Engbersen G., Schuyt K., Timmer J. and van Waarden F., 1993: Cultures of Unemployment: a Comparative Look at Long-Term Unemployment and Urban Poverty. Westview, Boulder.Google Scholar
  40. Grendstad G., 1990: Europe by Cultures, An Exploration in Grid/Group Analysis. graduate Thesis, University of Bergen.Google Scholar
  41. Grendstad G., 1995: Party followership and leadership in Norway: a political culture approach, Party Politics, 1(2): 221-243.Google Scholar
  42. Grendstad G. and Selle P., 1995: Cultural Theory and the new institutionalism. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 7(1): 5-27.Google Scholar
  43. Grendstad G. and Selle P. (eds), 1996: Kultur som Levemåte. Samlaget, Oslo.Google Scholar
  44. Grendstad G. and Selle P., 1997: Cultural theory, postmaterialism and environmental attitudes. In: Ellis R.J. and Thompson M. (eds), Culture Matters, pp. 151-168.Google Scholar
  45. Grendstad G. and Selle P., 1999: The formation and transformation of preferences, cultural theory and postmaterialism compared. In: Thompson et al. (eds), Cultural Theory as Political Science. Routledge, London, pp. 43-58.Google Scholar
  46. Gross J.L. and Rayner S., 1985: Measuring Culture: A Paradigm for the Analysis of Social Organisation. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  47. Hendriks F., 1994: Cars and cultures in Birmingham and Munich. In Coyle D. and Ellis R.J. (eds), Politics, Policy and Culture, pp. 51-69.Google Scholar
  48. Hendriks F., 1996: Beleid, cultuur en instituties, het verhaal van twee steden. DSWO Press, Leiden.Google Scholar
  49. Hendriks F., 1999: Political Institutions and Public Policy: A Tale of Two Cities. Edward Elgar (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  50. Holling C.S., 1986: The resilience of territorial ecosystems. In: Clark W.C. and Munn R. (eds), Sustainable Development of the Biosphere. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 292-388.Google Scholar
  51. Hood C., 1996: Control over bureaucracy: cultural theory and institutional variety. Journal of Public Policy, 15(3): 207-230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hood C., 1998: The Art of the State, Culture, Rhetoric, and Public Management. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  53. Hoppe R. and Peterse A., 1994: Handling Frozen Fire: Political Culture and Risk Management. Westview, Boulder.Google Scholar
  54. Karmasin H. and Karmasin M., 1997: Cultural Theory: ein neuer Ansatz für Kommunikation, Marketing und Management. Linde Verlag, Wien.Google Scholar
  55. Mamadouh V., 1997: Political culture: a typology grounded on cultural theory. Geojournal, 43(1): 17-25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mamadouh V., 1999: National political cultures in the European Union. In: Thompson M., Grendstad G. and Selle P. (eds), Cultural Theory as Political Science. Routledge, London, pp. 138-153.Google Scholar
  57. Marris C., Langford I. and O'Riordan T., 1998: A quantitative test of the cultural theory of risk perceptions, Comparisons with the psychometric paradigm. Risk Analysis, 18(5): 635-647.Google Scholar
  58. Mars G., 1982: Cheats at Work, an Anthropology of Workplace Crime. George Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
  59. Milton K., 1996: Environmentalism and Cultural Theory. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  60. Molenaers N. and Thompson, M., 1999: The cultural conditions for democracy and their implications for transitional societies. In: Thompson M., Grendstad G. and Selle P. (eds), Cultural Theory as Political Science. Routledge, London, pp. 186-205.Google Scholar
  61. Ney S. and Thompson M., 1999: Consulting the frogs, the normative implications of cultural theory. In: Thompson M. (eds), Cultural Theory as Political Science. Routledge, London, pp. 206-223.Google Scholar
  62. Olli E., 1995: Cultural Theory Specified — The Coherent, Sequential and Synthetic Individual Approach. Graduate Thesis, University of Bergen.Google Scholar
  63. Olli E., 1999: Rejection of cultural biases and effects on party preference. In: Thompson M. et al. (eds), Cultural Theory as Political Science. Routledge, London, pp. 59-74.Google Scholar
  64. Ostander D., 1982: One-and two-dimensional models of the distribution of beliefs. In: Douglas M. (ed.), Essays in the Sociology of Perception, pp. 14-30.Google Scholar
  65. Ouchi W., 1980: Markets, bureaucracies and clans. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25: 129-141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rayner S., 1979: The classification and dynamics of sectarian forms of organisations: grid/group perspectives on the far left in Britain, PhD dissertation, University of London.Google Scholar
  67. Rayner S., 1982: The perception of time and space in egalitarian sects, a millenarian cosmology. In: Douglas M. (ed.), Essays in the Sociology of Perception, pp. 247-276.Google Scholar
  68. Rayner S., 1984: Disagreeing about risk: the institutional cultures of risk management and planning for future generations. In: Hadden S.G. (ed.), Risk Analysis, Institutions and Public Policy. Associated Faculty Press, New York, pp. 150-169.Google Scholar
  69. Rayner S., 1986: Management of radiation hazards in hospitals, plural rationalities in a single institution. Social Studies of Science, 16: 573-591.Google Scholar
  70. Rayner S., 1988: The rules that keep us equal. In: Flanagan J.G. and Rayner S. (eds), Rules, Decisions and Inequality. Avebury, Brookfield, Vermont/Aldershot.Google Scholar
  71. Rayner S., 1992: Cultural theory and risk analysis. In: Krimsky S. and Golding D. (eds), Social Theories of Risk, Praeger, Westport, pp. 83-115.Google Scholar
  72. Rayner S., 1993: Risk perception, technology acceptance, and institutional culture: case studies of some new definitions. In: Ruck B. (ed.), Risk is a Construct. Knesebeck, München, pp. 197-220.Google Scholar
  73. Rayner S. and Malone E.L. (eds), 1998: Human Choice and Climate Change (four volumes), Battelle Press, Columbus, Ohio.Google Scholar
  74. Schmutzer M., 1994: Ingenium und Individuum: eine sozialwissenschaftlichr Theorie der Wissenschaft und Technik, Springer-Verlag, Wien.Google Scholar
  75. Schwarz M. and Thompson M., 1990: Divided We Stand: Redefining Politics, Technology and Social Choice. Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead.Google Scholar
  76. Selle P., 1991: Culture and the study of politics. Scandinavian Political Studies, 14(2): 97-124.Google Scholar
  77. Shackleton M., 1991: The European Community between three ways of life. Journal of Common Market Studies, 29(6): 575-601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Sjöberg L., 1997: Explaining risk perception: an empirical evaluation of cultural theory. Risk, Decision and Policy, 2(2): 113-130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Tansey J. and O'Riordan T., 1999: Cultural theory and risk: a review. Health, Risk, Society, 1(1): 71-90.Google Scholar
  80. Thompson M., 1979: Rubbish Theory: The Creation and Destruction of Value. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  81. Thompson M., 1982a: A three-dimensional model. In: Douglas M. (ed.), Essays in the Sociology of Perception, pp. 31-63.Google Scholar
  82. Thompson M., 1982b: The problem of the centre: an autonomous cosmology. In: Douglas M. (ed.), Essays in the Sociology of Perception, pp. 302-327.Google Scholar
  83. Thompson M., 1997a: Cultural theory and integrated assessment. Environmental Modeling and Assesment, 2: 139-150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Thompson M. and Rayner S., 1998a: Cultural discourses. In: Rayner S. and Malone E. (eds), Human Choices and Climate Change. Vol. 1. The Societal Framework, Batelle, Columbus, pp. 139-166.Google Scholar
  85. Thompson M. and Rayner S., 1998b: Risk and governance, Part I: The discourses of climate change. Government and Opposition, 35(2): 139-166.Google Scholar
  86. Thompson M. and Wildavsky A., 1986: A poverty distinction: from economic homogeneity to cultural heterogeneity in the classification of poor people. Policy Sciences, 19: 163-199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Thompson M., 1997b: Security and solidarity: an anti-reductionist framework for thinking about the relationship between us and the rest of nature, The Geographical Journal, 163(2): 141-149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Thompson M., Ellis R. and Wildavsky A., 1990: Cultural Theory. Westview Press, Boulder, Co.Google Scholar
  89. Thompson M., Ellis R. and Wildavsky A., 1992: Political cultures. In: Hawkesworth M. and Hogan M. (eds), Encyclopedia of Government and Politics. Vol. 1, Routledge, London, pp. 507-520.Google Scholar
  90. Thompson M., Grendstad G. and Selle P. (eds), 1999: Cultural Theory as Political Science. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  91. Thompson M. Rayner S. and Ney S., 1998: Risk and governance, Part II: Policy in a complex and plurally perceived world. Government and Opposition, 33(3): 330-354.Google Scholar
  92. Van Asselt M.B.A. and Rotmans J., 1996: Uncertainty in perspective. Global Environmental Change, 6(2): 121-157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Verweij M., 1995: Cultural theory and the study of International relations. Millenium, 24(1): 87-111.Google Scholar
  94. Verweij M., 1997: Review article: developing the cultural analysis of Mary Douglas. Government and Opposition, 32(3): 421-429.Google Scholar
  95. Verweij M., 1998: Cultures and institutions in transboundary relations: the environmental protection of the Rhine and the Great Lakes. PhD thesis European University Institute, Florence.Google Scholar
  96. Ward V., 1998: Towards a theory of state — non-state actors: a grid-group cultural approach. In: Jacquin-Berdal D., Oros A. and Verweij M. (eds), Culture in World Politics. MacMillan, London/St Martin's, New York (Millenium, Journal of International Studies) pp. 206-244.Google Scholar
  97. Webber C. and Wildavsky A., 1986. A History of Taxation and Expenditure in the Western World. Simon and Schuster, New York.Google Scholar
  98. Wildavsky A., 1984: The Nursing Father: Moses as a Political Leader, The University of Alabama Press, Alabama.Google Scholar
  99. Wildavsky A., 1985. Change in political culture. Politics, The Journal of the Australasian Political Studies Association, 20(2): 95-102.Google Scholar
  100. Wildavsky A., 1986: Budgeting, A Comparative Theory of Budgetary Processes. Second, Revised Edition. Transaction Books, New Brunswick/Oxford.Google Scholar
  101. Wildavsky A., 1987: Choosing preferences by constructing institutions: a cultural theory of preference formation. American Political Science Review, 81(1): 3-21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Wildavsky A. (ed.), 1991: The Rise of Radical Egalitarianism. American University Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  103. Wildavsky A., 1991: What other theory would be expected to answer such profound questions? A reply to Per Selle's critique of cultural theory. Scandinavian Political Studies, 14(4): 355-360.Google Scholar
  104. Wildavsky A., 1994: Democracy as a coalition of cultures. Society, 31: 80-83.Google Scholar
  105. Wildavsky A., 1994: Why self interest means less outside a social context, Cultural contributions to a theory of rational choice. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 6(2): 131-159.Google Scholar
  106. Wildavksy A. and Dake K., 1990: Theories of risk perception: who fears what and why? Daedalus, 119: 41-60.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Virginie Mamadouh
    • 1
  1. 1.Amsterdam Study Centre for the Metropolitan EnvironmentUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations