Chinese and Americans Agree on What Is Fair, but Disagree on What Is Best in Societal Decisions Affecting Health and Safety Risks

Abstract

Through surveys of students and junior professionals and interviews with business and government executives, we studied Chinese choices and fairness perceptions in risky health and safety decisions. The survey responses were compared with American responses from an earlier study by Keller and Sarin.

The survey results show that the American and Chinese respondents had similar fairness perceptions, but the Chinese did not make decisions that were consistent with their fairness perceptions, whereas the Americans did. We found that the middle-age Chinese professionals tended to make choices that were more different from the Americans than were the choices of the young Chinese management students. It is likely that these discrepancies were caused by cultural differences, with the younger Chinese tending to face a stronger Western influence.

The insights from the survey results were enriched by interviews that revealed fairness perceptions of Chinese business and government executives. A framework to interpret cultural influences on decision making was also proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.

    Aristotle, Ethics(J. A. K. Thompson, translation), Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin (reprinted in 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Plato, The Republic(F. M. Cornford, translation), New York: Oxford University Press (reprinted in 1945).

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    R. L. Keeney, "Utility Functions for Equity and Public Risk," Management Science, 26, 345-353 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    R. L. Keeney, "Equity and Public Risk," Operations Research, 28, 527-534 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    R. L. Keeney, "Evaluating Alternatives Involving Potential Fatalities," Operations Research, 28, 188-205 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    R. L. Keeney and R. L. Winkler, "Evaluating Decision Strategies for Equity of Public Risks," Operations Research, 33955-970 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Rakesh Kumar Sarin, "Measuring Equity in Public Risk," Operations Research, 33(1), 210-217 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    L. Robin Keller and R. K. Sarin, "Equity in Social Risk: Some Empirical Observations," Risk Analysis, 8(1), 135-146 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    P. C. Fishburn, and Philip D. Straffin, "Equity Considerations in Public Risks Evaluation," Operations Research, 37(2), 229-239 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    P. C. Fishburn and Rakesh K. Sarin, "Dispersive Equity and Social Risk," Management Science, 37, 751-769 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Jonnathan Baron, Morality and Rational Choice, Dordrecht; Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Kwok Leung and M. H. Bond, "How Americans and Chinese reward taskrelated contributions: a preliminary study," Psychologia, 25, 2-9 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    James Cox, "RedLetter Day as East Meets West in the Aisles: Great WalMart of China," USA Today, Sept. 11, 1996, pages B1-2.

  14. 14.

    Evelyn Iritani, "An Economic '800pound Gorilla,' China Is Consuming and Selling in Huge Quantities," Los Angeles TimesAugust 30, 1996, pp. A1 and A6.

  15. 15.

    The Economist(1996), "China Looming," pp. 13-14, and "China, A FunnyLooking Tiger: What Can the Asian Tigers tell us About the Future of China?" pp. 17-19, August 17.

  16. 16.

    Rene Schoof, "China Tries to Control Worsening Air Pollution: The World's No. 1 Producer and Consumer of Coal has Toughened Laws and Closed Thousands of Heavily Polluting Factories," Los Angeles Times, Jan. 7, 1997, p. D14.

  17. 17.

    Maggie Farley, "The Polite Patriots of China: ExFarming Village is Role Model for Campaign to Promote Good Behavior; 'Spiritual Civilization' is Seen as a Way to Reduce Chaos of Market Economy," Los Angeles Times, Sept. 14, 1996, pp. A1, A21, A22.

  18. 18.

    Jacob Heilbrun, "U.S. vs. Asia: Culture as Diplomacy," Los Angeles TimesDec. 29, 1996, pages M1 and M6.

  19. 19.

    L. Robin Keller and Rakesh Kumar Sarin, "Fair Processes for Societal Decisions Involving Distributional Inequalities," Risk Analysis, 15(1), 49-59 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Monika I. Winn and L. Robin Keller, "A Modeling Methodology for MultiObjective MultiShareholder Decisions: Implications for Research," Working Paper, University of California, Irvine (1999).

  21. 21.

    E. Vaughan and B. Nordenstam, "The Perception of Environmental Risks among Ethnically Diverse Groups," Journal of CrossCultural Psychology, 22, 29-60 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Joanna Sokolowska and Tadeusz Tyszka, "Perception and Acceptance of Technological and Environmental Risks: Why Are Poor Countries Less Concerned?" Risk Analysis, 15(6), (1995).

  23. 23.

    Ellen Greenberger and Chuansheng Chen, U.S.China Adolescents study, UCI working paper (1996).

  24. 24.

    Christopher R. Hsee and Elke U. Weber, "CrossCultural Differences in Risk Perception but CrossCultural Similarities in Attitudes Toward Perceived Risk." Management Science 44, 1205-1217 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    R. N. Bontempo, W. P. Bottom, and E. U. Weber, "CrossCultural Differences in Risk Perception: A ModelBased Approach." Risk Analysis 17, 479-488 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    J. Legge, The Chinese Classics, 1, Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    G. Hofstede, Culture's Consequences: International Differences in WorkRelated Values. Beveley Hills, CA: Sage Publications (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    G. Hofstede, Cultures and OrganizationsSoftware of the Mind. Berkshire, England: McGrawHill Book Company, Europe (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    L. E. Chong and J. P. Craig, and S. A. Scherling, "Managing work related values in a Chinese corporation," Paper presented to the annual meeting of the Academy of International Business, San Francisco, April, 1983 (1983).

  30. 30.

    George L. Van Houtven, "Altruistic preferences for lifesaving public programs: do baseline risks matter?" Risk Analysis 17(1), 85-92 (1997).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    L. K. Hsu, Americans and Chinese, New York: Henry Schuman (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Charles William Morris, Varieties of Human Value. Chicago: University of Chicago Press (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    E. P. Blumenthal, "Models in Chinese Moral Education: Perspectives from Children's Books," Dissertation Abstracts International, 37, 6357A-8A (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Inmao Liu, "Chinese Cognition," In Michael Harris Bond (ed.) Psychology of the Chinese People(73-105), Oxford University Press (1986).

  35. 35.

    David Y. F. Ho, "Chinese Patterns of Socialization: A Critical Review," In Michael Harris Bond (ed.), Psychology of the Chinese People. Great Britain: Oxford University Press (1-35) (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Daniel H. Kahneman and A. Tversky, "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk." Econometrica 47, 263-290 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Willem A. Wagenaar, Gideon Keren, and Sarah Lichtenstein, "Islanders and Hostages: Deep and Surface Structures of Decision Problems," Acta Psychologica, 67, 175-189 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    H. P. Young, Equity. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    J. Whiting and B. B. Whiting, "Contributions of Anthropology to the Methods of Studying Child Rearing." In Culture and Human Development: The Selected Papers of John Whiting(Eleanor Hollenberg Chasdi, ed.), Cambridge: England; New York: Cambridge University Press (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Y. W. Hsieh, "The Status of Individual in Chinese Ethics." In Charles A. Moore (ed.) The Chinese Mind. Hawaii: University of Hawaii Press (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Edward T. Hall, Beyond Culture, Garden City, NY: Anchor Press/Doubleday (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Philip R. Cateora, International Marketing(eighth edition), Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Stephen M. Pollock and Kan Chen, "Strive to Conquer the Black Stink: Decision Analysis in the People's Republic of China," Interfaces, 16, 31-37 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Stephen C. Graves, "Reflections on Operations Management in Shanghai," Interfaces, 16, 11-17 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    J. F. Yates, Y. Zhu, D. L. Ronis, D. F. Wang, H. Shinotsuka, and M. Toda, "Probability Judgment Accuracy: China, Japan, and the United States," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 43, 147-171 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Joanna Ho and Janie Chang, "Does National Culture or Professional Knowledge Affect Auditors' Probability Conjunction Judgments? A Study of the United States versus Taiwan," International Journal of Accounting, 29, 189-205 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    WenQiang Bian and L. Robin Keller, "Fairness Patterns of Judgments in North America and the People's Republic of China," Journal of Consumer Psychology, 8(3), 301-320 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    WenQiang Bian, L. Robin Keller, and Rong Zhang, "Consumers' Economic Norms in the Marketplace of the People's Republic of China," Working Paper, University of California, Irvine (1999).

  49. 49.

    Daniel H. Kahneman and Jack L. Knetsch, and Richard H. Thaler, "Fairness as a Constraint on Profit Seeking: Entitlements in the Market," The American Economic Review 76(4), 728-741 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Daniel H. Kahneman and Jack L. Knetsch, and Richard H. Thaler, "Fairness and Assumptions of Economics," The Journal of Business, 59(4), Pt. 2, S285S300 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Robin Keller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bian, WQ., Keller, L.R. Chinese and Americans Agree on What Is Fair, but Disagree on What Is Best in Societal Decisions Affecting Health and Safety Risks. Risk Anal 19, 439–452 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007000712537

Download citation

  • Health and safety risks
  • decision analysis
  • fairness
  • equity
  • cross-cultural
  • Chinese
  • risky decisions