Skip to main content
Log in

Corporate Ownership Structure in Austria

  • Published:
Empirica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper aims to add to the knowledge about ownership structure in Austria. It assesses ownership concentration and the relative importance of the investor categories banks, the state, families, and domestic and foreign firms on the basis of a sample of 600 of the largest non-financial corporations. Balance sheet data, internal rates of return calculations and regression estimates show that not only ownership concentration, but also the identity of the large controlling shareholder is relevant to efficient governance of corporations. While foreign control increases profitability, particularly state control is detrimental to shareholder wealth maximization. Likewise, profit margin equation estimates cannot reject the entrenchment hypothesis and/or expropriation of minority shareholders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baumol, W.J., Heim, P., Malkiel, B.G., and Quandt, R.E. (1970) ‘Earning Retentions, New Capital and the Growth of the Firm', Review of Economics and Statistics 52, 345–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becht, M. (1997) Beneficial Ownership of Listed Companies in the United States, ECGN mimeo.

  • Becht, M. and Böhmer, E. (1997) Transparency of Ownership and Control in Germany, ECGN mimeo.

  • Berle, A.A. and Means, G.C. (1932) The Modern Corporation and Private Property, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick and London: The MacMillan Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, M., Bianco, M., and Enriques, L. (1997) Ownership, Pyramidal Groups and the Separation of Ownership and Control in Italy, ECGN mimeo.

  • Bloch, L. and Kremp, E. (1997) Ownership and Control in France, ECGN mimeo.

  • Charkham, JP. (1994) Keeping Good Company, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, A., Kabir, R., and Röell, A. (1997) Ownership and Control in the Netherlands, ECGN mimeo.

  • Demsetz, H. and Lehn, K. (1985) ‘The Structure of Corporate Ownership: Causes and Consequences', Journal of Political Economy 93(6), 1155–1177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. and Fischer, K. (1994) Banks, Finance, and Investment in Germany, Cambridge University Press.

  • Elston, J. (1993) Firm Ownership Structure and Investment: Theory and Evidence from German Panel Data, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung.

  • Franks, J. and Mayer, C. (1997) Ownership, Control, and the Performance of German Corporations, London Business School and University of Oxford.

  • Grabowsky, H.G. and Mueller, D.C. (1972) ‘Managerial and Stockholder Welfare Models of Firm Expenditures', Review of Economics and Statistics 54, 9–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gugler K., Kalss, S., Stomper, A., and Zechner, J. (1997) The Separation of Ownership and Control: An Austrian Perspective, ECGNmimeo.

  • Herman, E.S. (1981) Corporate Control, Corporate Power, Cambridge University Press.

  • Hoshi, T., Kashyap, A., and Scharfstein, D. (1990) ‘The Role of Banks in Reducing the Costs of Financial Distress in Japan', Journal of Financial Economics 27, 67–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoshi, T., Kashyap, A., and Scharfstein, D. (1991) ‘Corporate Structure, Liquidity, and Investment: Evidence from Japanese Industrial Groups', Quarterly Journal of Economics 106, 33–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M.C. and Meckling, W.H. (1976) ‘Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure', Journal of Financial Economics 3, 305–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leech, D. and Leahy, J. (1991) ‘Ownership Structure, Control Type Classifications and the Performance of Large British Companies', The Economic Journal 101, 1418–1437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenberg, F.R. and Pushner, G.M. (1992) ‘Ownership Structure and Corporate Performance in Japan', NBER WP No. 4092.

  • Morck, R., Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R.W. (1988) ‘Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis', Journal of Financial Economics 20, 293–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, D.C., and Reardon, E. (1993) ‘Rates of Return on Investment', Southern Economic Journal 60, 430–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, D.C. and Yun, L. (1995) ‘Comparing Estimates of Rates of Return', Industrial and Corporate Change, forthcoming.

  • Prowse, S.D. (1992) ‘The Structure of Corporate Ownership in Japan', The Journal of Finance XLVII(3), 1121–1140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renneboog, L. (1997) Concentration of Ownership and Pyramidal Shareholding Structures in Belgian Listed Companies, ECGN mimeo.

  • Roe, M.J. (1994) Strong Managers, Weak Owners, Princeton University Press.

  • Shinnar, R., Dressler, O., Feng, C.A., and Avidan, A. (1989) ‘Estimation of the Economic Rate of Return for Industrial Companies', Journal of Business 62(3), 417–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. (1980) ‘A Heteroscedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroscedasticity', Econometrica 48(4).

  • Williamson, O.E. (1970) Corporate Control and Business Behavior, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall International, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gugler, K. Corporate Ownership Structure in Austria. Empirica 25, 285–307 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006967517368

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006967517368

Navigation