Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 45, Issue 1–3, pp 35–44 | Cite as

Test Validity: A Matter of Consequence

  • Samuel Messick
Article

Abstract

In this note I comment briefly on Keith Markus's illuminating article on “Science, measurement, and validity: Is completion of Samuel Messick's synthesis possible?” Markus's analysis bears directly on the controversial status of the consequential basis of test validity in relation to the more traditional evidential basis. After addressing some key points in his argument, I then comment more generally on sources of the controversy over the claim that empirical consequences of test interpretation and use constitute validity evidence.

Keywords

Evidential Basis Test Validity Validity Evidence Empirical Consequence Test Interpretation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. American Psychological Association, American Educational Research Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education: 1985, Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  2. Brandon, P. R.: 1996, Discussion of the Consequential Aspect of Validity. AERAD list on the Internet.Google Scholar
  3. Cronbach, L. J.: 1971, ‘Test validity’, in R. L. Thorndike (ed.), Educational Measurement, 2nd ed. (American Council on Education, Washington, DC), pp. 430–507.Google Scholar
  4. Cronbach, L. J. and P. E. Meehl: 1955, ‘Construct validity in psychological tests’, Psychological Bulletin 52, pp. 281–302.Google Scholar
  5. Frederiksen, N.: 1984, ‘The real test bias. Influences of testing on teaching and learning’, American Psychologist 39(3), pp. 193–202.Google Scholar
  6. Kohlberg, L.: 1964, ‘Development of moral character and moral ideology’, in M. Hoffman and L. W. Hoffman (eds.), Review of Child Development Research 1, pp. 383–431.Google Scholar
  7. Linn, R. L.: 1997, ‘Evaluating the validity of assessments: The consequences of use’, Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 16(2), pp. 14–16.Google Scholar
  8. Loevinger, J.: 1957, ‘Objective tests as instruments of psychological theory’, Psychological Reports 3, pp. 635–694 (Monograph Supp. 9).Google Scholar
  9. Loevinger, J.: 1966, ‘The meaning and measurement of ego development’, American Psychologist 21, pp. 195–206.Google Scholar
  10. Mehrens, W. A.: 1997, ‘The consequences of consequential validity’, Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 16(2), pp. 16–18.Google Scholar
  11. Messick, S.: 1989, ‘Validity’, in R. L. Linn (ed.), Educational Measurement (Macmillan, New York), pp. 13–103.Google Scholar
  12. Messick, S.: 1994, ‘The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments’, Educational Researcher 23(2), pp. 13–23.Google Scholar
  13. Messick, S.: 1996, ‘Validity and washback in language testing’, Language Testing 13(3), pp. 241–256.Google Scholar
  14. Piaget, J.: 1932, 'The Moral Judgment of the Child (Kegan Paul, London).Google Scholar
  15. Popham, W. J.: 1997, ‘Consequential validity: Right concern — wrong concept’, Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 16(2), pp. 9–13.Google Scholar
  16. Shepard, L. A.: 1997, ‘The centrality of test use and consequences for test validity’, Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 16(2), pp. 5–8, 13, 24.Google Scholar
  17. Tenopyr, M. L.: 1996, April, Construct-Consequences Confusion. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Diego.Google Scholar
  18. Wiley, D. E.: 1991, ‘Test validity and invalidity reconsidered’, in R. E. Snow and D. E. Wiley (eds.), Improving Inquiry in the Social Sciences: A Volume in Honor of Lee J. Cronbach (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ), (pp. 75–107).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Samuel Messick
    • 1
  1. 1.Educational Testing ServicePrinceton, dUSA

Personalised recommendations