Skip to main content
Log in

Validity, facts, and values sans closure: Reply to Messick, Reckase, Moss, and Zimmerman

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Derrida, J.: 1978, Writing and Difference (A. Bass Trans.) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J.: 1988, Limited Inc (G. Graff Ed.) (Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F.: 1992, The End of History and the Last Man (Free Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkham, R. L.: 1997, Theories of Truth: A Critical Introduction (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld, P. F. and N. W. Henry: 1968, Latent Structure Analysis (Houghton Mifflin, Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, K. A.: 1998, ‘Science, measurement, and validity: Is completion of Samuel Messick's synthesis possible?’ Social Indicators Research 45, 7–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messick, S.: 1998, ‘Test validity: A matter of consequence’, Social Indicators Research 45, 35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messick, S.: 1989, ‘Validity’, in R. L. Linn (ed.), Educational Measurement, 3rd ed. (American Council on Education, New York), pp. 13–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millikan, R. G.: 1993, White Queen Psychology and Other Essays for Alice (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, P. A.: 1998, ‘Recovering a dialectical view of rationality’, Social Indicators Research 45, 55–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMullin, E.: 1988, ‘Values in science’, in E. D. Klemke, R. Hollinger and A. D. Kline (eds.), Introductory Readings in the Philosophy of Science, rev. ed. (Prometheus Books, Buffalo, NY), pp. 349–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reckase, M. D.: 1998, ‘The interaction of values and validity assessment: Does a test's level of validity depend on a researcher's values?’, Social Indicators Research 45, 45–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E.: 1998, How to Think Straight about Psychology, 5th ed. (Addison, Wesley, Longman Pub. Co., Reading, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tippins, N. T.: 1998, April 26, A Practitioner's Perspective of the Standards. Paper presented at the 13th Annual Conference of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Dallas, TX.

  • Zimmerman, D. W.: 1998, 'Commentary on “Science, Measurement, and Validity: Is Completion of Samuel Messick's synthesis possible?” by Keith A. Markus. Social Indicators Research 45, 69–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, D. W.: 1996, ‘Is a final theory conceivable?’ The Psychological Record 46, pp. 423–438.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Markus, K.A. Validity, facts, and values sans closure: Reply to Messick, Reckase, Moss, and Zimmerman. Social Indicators Research 45, 73–82 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006929327820

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006929327820

Navigation